Hans Assmus1, Gregor Antoniadis, Christian Bischoff. 1. (Former Practice of Peripheral Nerve Surgery in Dossenheim/Heidelberg:), District Hospital of Günzburg (Neurosurgical Department of the University of Ulm), Neurology Group Practice Marienplatz, Munich.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome is by far the most common peripheral nerve compression syndrome, affecting approximately one in every six adults to a greater or lesser extent. Splitting the flexor retinaculum to treat carpal tunnel syndrome is the second most common specialized surgical procedure in Germany. Cubital tunnel syndrome is rarer by a factor of 13, and the other compression syndromes are rarer still. METHODS: This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library, along with current guidelines and the authors' clinical and scientific experience. RESULTS: Randomized controlled trials have shown, with a high level of evidence, that the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome yields very good results regardless of the particular technique used, as long as the diagnosis and the indication for surgery are well established by the electrophysiologic and radiological findings and the operation is properly performed. The success rates of open surgery, and the single-portal and dual-portal endoscopic methods are 91.6%, 93.4% and 92.5%, respectively. When performed by experienced hands, all these procedures have complication rates below 1%. The surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome has a comparably low complication rate, but worse results overall. Neuro-ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (neuro-MRI) are increasingly being used to complement the diagnostic findings of electrophysiologic studies. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based diagnostic methods and treatment recommendations are now available for the two most common peripheral nerve compression syndromes. Further controlled trials are needed for most of the rarer syndromes, especially the controversial ones.
BACKGROUND:Carpal tunnel syndrome is by far the most common peripheral nerve compression syndrome, affecting approximately one in every six adults to a greater or lesser extent. Splitting the flexor retinaculum to treat carpal tunnel syndrome is the second most common specialized surgical procedure in Germany. Cubital tunnel syndrome is rarer by a factor of 13, and the other compression syndromes are rarer still. METHODS: This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library, along with current guidelines and the authors' clinical and scientific experience. RESULTS: Randomized controlled trials have shown, with a high level of evidence, that the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome yields very good results regardless of the particular technique used, as long as the diagnosis and the indication for surgery are well established by the electrophysiologic and radiological findings and the operation is properly performed. The success rates of open surgery, and the single-portal and dual-portal endoscopic methods are 91.6%, 93.4% and 92.5%, respectively. When performed by experienced hands, all these procedures have complication rates below 1%. The surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome has a comparably low complication rate, but worse results overall. Neuro-ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (neuro-MRI) are increasingly being used to complement the diagnostic findings of electrophysiologic studies. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based diagnostic methods and treatment recommendations are now available for the two most common peripheral nerve compression syndromes. Further controlled trials are needed for most of the rarer syndromes, especially the controversial ones.
Authors: Juan Martin Valdivia Valdivia; Martin Weinand; Christopher T Maloney; Andrew L Blount; Arnold Lee Dellon Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: Daniela Ohlendorf; Yvonne Haas; Antonia Naser; Jasmin Haenel; Laura Maltry; Fabian Holzgreve; Christina Erbe; Werner Betz; Eileen M Wanke; Dörthe Brüggmann; Albert Nienhaus; David A Groneberg Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Bettina Wollesen; Julia Gräf; Nils Schumacher; Gianluca Meyer; Matthias Wanstrath; Christian Feldhaus; Kerstin Luedtke; Klaus Mattes Journal: Saf Health Work Date: 2020-07-06
Authors: Yvonne Haas; Antonia Naser; Jasmin Haenel; Laura Fraeulin; Fabian Holzgreve; Christina Erbe; Werner Betz; Eileen M Wanke; Doerthe Brueggmann; Albert Nienhaus; David A Groneberg; Daniela Ohlendorf Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 3.240