Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Cardiovascular safety of new oral anticoagulants: re-analysis of 27 randomized trials based on Bayesian network meta-analysis.

× No keyword cloud information.

11 in total

1. Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons.

Authors: Thomas Lumley
Journal: Stat Med Date: 2002-08-30 Impact factor: 2.373

2. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors: H C Bucher; G H Guyatt; L E Griffith; S D Walter
Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 6.437

3. A Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: how to do it.

Authors: Teresa Greco; Giovanni Landoni; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Alberto Zangrillo
Journal: Stat Methods Med Res Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 3.021

Review 4. Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009.

Authors: Andrew W Lee
Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 6.437

5. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.

Authors: David C Hoaglin; Neil Hawkins; Jeroen P Jansen; David A Scott; Robbin Itzler; Joseph C Cappelleri; Cornelis Boersma; David Thompson; Kay M Larholt; Mireya Diaz; Annabel Barrett
Journal: Value Health Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.725

6. Comparing Bayesian and frequentist approaches for multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons.

Authors: Hwanhee Hong; Bradley P Carlin; Tatyana A Shamliyan; Jean F Wyman; Rema Ramakrishnan; François Sainfort; Robert L Kane
Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 2.583

7. Comparative coronary risks of apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran: a meta-analysis and adjusted indirect comparison.

Authors: Yoon K Loke; Shiva Pradhan; Jessica Ka-Yan Yeong; Chun Shing Kwok
Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 4.335

8. Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons.

Authors: Fujian Song; Allan Clark; Max O Bachmann; Jim Maas
Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 4.615

9. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies.

Authors: J P T Higgins; D Jackson; J K Barrett; G Lu; A E Ades; I R White
Journal: Res Synth Methods Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 5.273

10. Methods used to conduct and report Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons published in the medical literature: a systematic review.

Authors: Diana M Sobieraj; Joseph C Cappelleri; William L Baker; Olivia J Phung; C Michael White; Craig I Coleman
Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-07-21 Impact factor: 2.692

1 in total

1. Second-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: Interpreting outcomes by network meta-analysis.

Authors: Brigitta Badiani; Dario Maratea; Andrea Messori
Journal: World J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-10

1 in total