Effectiveness of biostimulation through nutrient content on the bioremediation of phenanthrene contaminated soil.

Bioremediation has shown its applicability for removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soil and sediments. In the present study, the effect of biostimulation on phenanthrene removal from contaminated soil via adding macro and/or micronutrients and trace elements was investigated. For these purposes three macro nutrients (as N, P and K), eight micronutrients (as Mg, S, Fe, Cl, Zn, Mn, Cu and Na) and four trace elements (as B, Mo, Co and Ni) in 11 mineral salts (MS) as variables were used. Placket-Burman statistical design was used to evaluate significance of variables (MS) in two levels of high and low. A consortium of adapted microorganisms with PAHs was used for inoculation to the soil slurry which was spiked with phenanthrene in concentration of 500 mg/kg soil. The optimal reduction resulted when a high level of macro nutrient in the range of 67-87% and low level of micro nutrient in the range of 12-32% were used with the nitrogen as the dominant macronutrient. The Pareto chart showed that NH4NO3 was the most effective variable in this experiment. The effect of elements on phenanthrene biodegradation showed following sequence as N > K > P > Cl > Na > Mg. Effectiveness of the other elements in all runs was less than 1%. The type and concentration of nutrient can play an important role in biodegradation of phenanthrene. Biostimulation with suitable combination of nutrient can enhance bioremediation of PAHs contaminated soils.

Background

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are chemical compounds made up of more than two fused aromatic rings in a linear or clustered arrangement, usually containing only carbon (C) and hydrogen (H) atoms, although nitrogen (N), sulphur (S) and oxygen (O) atoms may readily substitute in the benzene ring to form heterocyclic aromatic compounds. They are produced due to incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons and fossil fuels. Furthermore, natural occurrences also contribute in PAHs production. PAHs are highly hydrophobic which make them persistent and toxic to the environment and human [1,2]. Soil contamination to PAHs causes great health concerns because their persistency, toxicity, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity effects have been proved [3]. Different approaches like solvent extraction [4], phytoremediation [5], chemical remediation with various oxidants [6], photocatalytic remediation [7], electrochemical remediation [8], thermal destruction [9] and microbial degradation (bioremediation) [10,11] have been experimented for removal of PAHs from contaminated soils which bioremediation has been considered the most suitable for remediation of soils contaminated to PAHs [3,12]. Being environmental friendly and less ecologically damaging, less physical, chemical and biological changes in environmental conditions, less addition of chemicals, lower operational costs and proven efficiency are the main advantageous of bioremediation [13]. Both physical and chemical factors of reaction medium are effective on process efficiency. These factors include temperature, pH and accessibility of substrate to microorganisms, oxygen, nutrients, presence of electron acceptors and addition of macro and micro elements. Addition of nutrients, macro and micro elements or oxygen to the polluted site to enhance the microbial degradation ability is called biostimulation. According to literature, two processes including biostimulation and bioaugmentation are usually considered to enhance the bioremediation of soils contaminated by hydrocarbons. Biostimulation increases the bacterial activity of various strains present in the contaminated soil through the addition of nutrients [14], humic compounds [15] or other chemicals which could affect on the bacterial condition.

The needs of bacteria and other microorganisms to nutrients are approximately similar to their cell composition. Three mainpan> categories of nutrienpan>ts for microbial metabolism (macro and micro nutrienpan>t, and trace elemenpan>ts) were studied to determinpan>e the best nutritional composition in bioremediation of PAHs contaminated soils. However, carbon is usually needed in higher amounts and can be provided by target pollutants. Bailey and Ollis (1986) said that nitrogen and phosphorus as macronutrients are 14% and 3% of dry weight of a typical microbial cell, respectively [16] but Liebeg and Cutright (1999) reported in their research that phosphorus was the dominant macronutrient in bioremediation of PAH. However micronutrients such as sulfur, calcium and magnesium in microbial cell are only 1, 0.5, and 0.5%, respectively [17], but the concentration of these micronutrient and the others in mineral salt medium for bioremediation were very different. For investigating the effect of several macro, micro and trace nutrients the Plackett–Burman experimental design was used in optimization of liquid culture medium because of its potential in considering many variables.

Selection of the most efficient nutritional mixture can be investigated by the experimental or statistical approaches. Statistical experimental designs have some advantages which directed researchers to consider those inpan> their bio studies such as their reliability, time savinpan>g (beinpan>g rapid), cost saving and their reduction in the total number of experiments [18]. Different experimental design approaches are developed for such optimization of process conditions. Approaches like multi factorial designs are difficult because high number of variables should be screened. Also the orthogonal nature of Plackett–Burman gives pure effect of each variable [18]. Many studies are implemented according to Plackett–Burman experimental design. Chauhan et al. (2007) used Plackett–Burman statistical design for lactic acid production by Lactobacillus sp. KCP01 using date juice [18]. Zhou et al. (2011) studied phenol degradation according to Plackett–Burman experimental design [19]. In the current study, the addition of different macro and/or micronutrients and trace elements in mineral salts medium (MSM) for phenanthrene removal from contaminated soil sample was experimented according to Plackett–Burman experimental.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Acetone, methanol and acetonitril in HPLC grade were purchased from ROMIL Company. Phenanthrene (Purity > 98%), the salts for nutrient solutions were purchased from Fluka, Sigma Aldrich and Merck Company. Nutrient Broth and R2A Agar were supplied by Difco and BIOMARK Company respectively.

Phenanthrene biodegradation investigation

Soil was collected from a depth of 5–20 cm of ground’s surface and was passed through a 2-mm sieve. To get free of any organic matter it was washed with acetone several times and then distilled water was used for removing residual acetone. The soil was consisted of 83.1% sand, 11.9% silt and 5% clay. Total nitrogen and phosphorus were 0.025% and 0.0012%, respectively. The pH and electrical conductivity (EC) of the soil were 7.4 and 3.2 ds/m, respectively.

Two grams of dry soil was placed into a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask as bioreactor. The bioreactors containing clean soil were autoclaved. A measured weight of phenanthrene was dissolved in acetone then it was used to spike the soil to have 500 mg phenanthrene/kg dry soil. For evaporation of the residual acetone the bioreactors were placed in a shaker (Heidolph, ProMax 2020 model) at the velocity of 180 rpm in room temperature and dark condition to have a uniform dispersion of phenanthrene.

The soil was inpan>oculated with a culture of bacteria with an optical density of 1 at 630 nm [20] using CECIL UV/vis spectrophotometer (model 7100) in different concentrations of nutrients according to Table 1. The culture consisted of five types of bacteria; Bacillus sporogenes, Bacillus licheniformis, Capnocytophaga ochracea (presumably), Acinetobacter sporogenes and Staphylococcus xylosus which enriched with Phenanthrene in our previous study [21]. At the end, the soil liquid ratio was 10% w/v and all the samples and their similar blanks were put in the shaker at the velocity of 180 rpm in the room temperature (22 ± 3°C) with pH adjusted at 6.8 ± 0.2 for 8 weeks.

Table 1

Twelve-trial Plackett–Burman design to study eleven factors in phenanthrene removal from soil: a comparison of experimented and predicted removal [22]

Run	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K
	KH 2 PO 4	K 2 HPO 4	NH 4 NO 3	MgSO 4	FeCL 3	NaCl	ZnSO 4 .H 2 O	MnSO 4 .H 2 O	CuSO 4 .5H 2 O	FeSO 4 .7H 2 O	Trace elements
1	+	-	+	-	-	-	+	+	+	-	+
2	+	+	-	+	-	-	-	+	+	+	-
3	-	+	+	-	+	-	-	-	+	+	+
4	+	-	+	+	-	+	-	-	-	+	+
5	+	+	-	+	+	-	+	-	-	-	+
6	+	+	+	-	+	+	-	+	-	-	-
7	-	+	+	+	-	+	+	-	+	-	-
8	-	-	+	+	+	-	+	+	-	+	-
9	-	-	-	+	+	+	-	+	+	-	+
10	+	-	-	-	+	+	+	-	+	+	-
11	-	+	-	-	-	+	+	+	-	+	+
12	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Experimental design

The liquid medium was processed for assessing the biodegradation of phenanthrene. Parametric optimization for biodegradation was studied with respect to three macro nutrienpan>ts (as N, P and K), eight micronutrients (as Mg, S, Fe, Cl, Zn, Mn, Cu and Na) and four trace elements (as B, Mo, Co and Ni) in mineral salt mediums. For this purpose eleven mineral salts were used according to the literature [23].

Plackett-Burman design is an efficient method to identify the important factors among a large number of variables. In this study, a 12 runs Plackett-Burman design was used to screen the important variables that significantly influenced n class="Chemical">phenanthrene degradation.

Each variable was applied at two levels of high (+) and low (−). The n class="Chemical">corresponding amount of variables and the level of them in 12 trials were shown in Tables 1, 2 and 3.

Table 2

Variables showing medium components used in Plackett–Burman design

Factor	Variables	Maximum level g/L	Minimum level g/L
A	KH2PO4	3	0.5
B	K2HPO4	3	0.5
C	NH4NO3	6.1	0.4
D	MgSO4	0.5	0.1
E	FeCL3	0.2	0.01
F	NaCl	0.8	0.01
G	ZnSO4.H2O	0.00005	0.02
H	MnSO4.H2O	0.004	0.0002
I	CuSO4.5H2O	0.0004	0.00002
J	FeSO4.7H2O	0.001	0.1
K	Trace elements	1 mL	1 mL

Table 3

The trace elements of nutrient solutions

Salts for trace elements	Maximum level (+) g/L	Minimum level (−) g/L
H3BO3	13 × 10 −3	5 × 10 −3
Na2MoO4	1 × 10 −5	1.4 × 10 −6
CoCl2	1 × 10 −4	1 × 10 −4
NiCl2	2 × 10 −4	2 × 10 −4

Variables showing medium n class="Chemical">components used in Plackett–Burman design

Determination of microbial population

The population of the inoculated culture was determined by the most probable number (MPN) method. The bacterial suspension was diluted tenfold serially in a sterile ringer solution (8.5 g NaCl per 1 L DW) and added to the sterile Nutrient Broth in the ratio of 10% of volume in triplicates in five series then they were incubated in 30°C. After 48 hours the turbidity of positive growth was seen in direct observation. The population of bacterial consortium was estimated according to statistical table of MPN [21].

The bioremediation efficiency in naturally contaminated soil

In order to investigate the optimized process efficiency, a soil sample naturally contaminated to PAHs was transferred to lab and the bioremediation efficiency was tried for, according to the most efficient expremental results and optimized conditions exactly like section 2–2. The preliminary investigations by GC-MS revealed that the soil was contaminated to phenenthrene, pyrene, anthracene, flourene and different aliphatic hydrocarbons. After 8 weeks the removal efficiency of PAHs was determined.

Extraction and analysis

The residual phenanthrene in the soil was extracted with methanol by ultrasonic homogenizer (Bandelin Sonoplus HD 2070) according to EPA 3550B (EPA) [24]. The extracted sample was then centrifuged (Hettich D7200) for 15 minutes at 6000 rpm , filtered through 2–3 cm of glass wool and then A portion of the filtered solution was used for analysis.

The extract was quantified by a HPLC from CECIL Company equipped with an Adept CE 4100 dual piston high pressure solvent delivery pump, a sample injection valve having a 20 μL sample loop and an Adept CE 4201 UV-Visible variable wavelength detector with 8 μL × 10 mm flow cell set at the wavelength of 220 nm. Separations were carried out on a C18 column, and the mobile phase was a mixture of methanol/deionized (90:10, v/v). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the retention time of phenanthrene was 10.0 min. The concentration of phenanthrene was determined after the calibration of the method with standard phenanthrene samples.

Results

The phenanthrene removal efficiency in different nutrient solutions

The results of average phenanthrene removal for different nutrient solutions are presented in Figure 1. The most removal efficiency of 85.7% was observed for run 1 with higher amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, Zn, Mn and trace elements in liquid medium folloewd by number 4, 3, 7 and 8 with removal values of 78.9%, 68.1%, 66.5% and 65.3% respectively.

Figure 1

Removal efficiency of phenanthrene for various nutrient solutions.

Removal efficiency of n class="Chemical">phenanthrene for various nutrient solutions.

Individual effect of factors on phenanthrene removal

The importance and effectivenpan>ess of each macro or micro nutrienpan>t and its positive or negative effect on removal efficiency is shown in Figure 2a (Pareto chart) and b (the main effect). For factors affecting the process positively, the nitrogen source showed the most importance followed by phosphorus sources; trace elements solution, Zn, FeSO4, Mn and mg. Factors affecting the phenanthrene removal negatively included FeCl2, NaCl and CuSO4.

Figure 2

The individual effect of each factor on phenanthrene removal efficiency, a) Pareto chart and b) the main effect plot.

Analysis of ANOVA

The ANOVA table partitions the variability inpan> removal inpan>to separate pieces for each of the effects (Table 4). It then tests the statistical significance of each effect by comparing the mean square against an estimate of the experimental error. In this case, 11 effects have P-values less than 0.05, indicating that they are significantly different from zero at the 95.0% confidence level.

Table 4

Analysis of variance for phenanthrene removal

Source	Sum of squares	Df	Mean square	F-ratio	P-value
A:Factor_A	2836.69	1	2836.69	5663.94	0.0000
B:Factor_B	2120.02	1	2120.02	4232.99	0.0000
C:Factor_C	13608.1	1	13608.1	27170.85	0.0000
D:Factor_D	46.0208	1	46.0208	91.89	0.0000
E:Factor_E	756.841	1	756.841	1511.16	0.0000
F:Factor_F	196.021	1	196.021	391.39	0.0000
G:Factor_G	1230.19	1	1230.19	2456.28	0.0000
H:Factor_H	159.141	1	159.141	317.75	0.0000
I:Factor_I	50.8408	1	50.8408	101.51	0.0000
J:Factor_J	521.401	1	521.401	1041.07	0.0000
K:Factor_K	1516.5	1	1516.5	3027.96	0.0000
Total error	18.03	36	0.500833
Total (corr.)	23059.8	47

R-squared = 99.9218 percent; R-squared (adjusted for df) = 99.8979 percent; Standard Error of Est. = 0.707696.

Mean absolute error = 0.50625; Durbin-Watson statistic = 3.14504 (P = 0.9982).

Lag 1 residual autocorrelation = −0.573073.

Analysis of variance for n class="Chemical">phenanthrene removal

Lag 1 residual auton class="Chemical">correlation = −0.573073.

The R-Squared statistic indicates that the model as fitted explains 99.9218% of the variability in removal. The adjusted R-squared statistic, which is more suitable for comparing models with different numbers of independent variables, is 99.8979%. The standard error of the estimate shows that the standard deviation of the residuals is 0.707696.

The phenathrene removal in optimized conditions for naturally contaminated soil

A soil sample naturally contaminated to different hydrocarbons was used to investigate to optimized process efficiency for PAHs removal. The GC-MS analysis on the soil sample is presented in Figure 3. According to analysis the picks of GC-MS, different hydrocarbons and four PAHs (to phenenthrene, pyrene, anthracene, flourene) were detected in the soil. The same inoculums like section 2–2 and optimized culture conditions were applied on the samples during 8 weeks. Results are presented in Table 5. The initial phenenthrene, pyrene, anthracene, flourene concentrations were 72, 61, 92 and 46 mg/kg, respectively. After 8 weeks, the phenenthrene, pyrene, anthracene, flourene concentrations were decreased to 31, 29, 26 and 27 mg/kg, respectively. The most removal efficiency of 71.7% was observed for antheracene, followed by 56.9% for phenanthrene, 52.4% for pyrene and 41.3 for flourene. The lower removal efficiency can be referred to the presence of other hydrocarbons and interfering factors of natural soil.

Figure 3

The GC-MS analysis of naturally contaminated soil.

Table 5

The PAHs removal efficiency in naturally contaminated soil

PAH	Initial concentration (mg/kg)	Final concentration (mg/kg)	Removal (%) in run 1	Removal (%) in run 3	Removal (%) in run 4
Phenanthrene	72	31	56.9 ± 2.3	41.2 ± 1.4	30.5 ± 1.6
Pyrene	61	29	52.4 ± 2.6	37.5 ± 3.6	33.6 ± 2.8
Anthracene	92	26	71.7 ± 1.9	68.7 ± 2.5	50.3 ± 3.4
Flourene	46	27	41.3 ± 3.3	25.2 ± 4.2	22.8 ± 2.7

The GC-MS analysis of naturally n class="Chemical">contaminated sn class="Chemical">oil.

Discussion

Bioremediation is often limited by environmenpan>tal, physical and chemical factors. One of the most important problems inpan> the bioremediation of PAHs is nutrients limitation in the soil and sediment. Biostimulation via addition of inorganic nutrients has been used as a strategy to enhance the biodegradation rate of PAH contaminated soils. Since the optimum values of macro and micro nutrient is highly dependent on the type of contaminant, microbial consortium and soil conditions, there isn’t a unique and clear explanation in the literature about the type and concentrations of nutrients for bioremediation of soils contaminated by hydrocarbons. Therefore, the most effective macro and micro nutrients and their concentrations for each specific application should be determined separately to enhance the removal efficiency of hydrocarbons present in the soil. In the present study, the addition of three macro nutrients, eight micronutrients and four trace elements in two high and low levels (according to literature) was investigated to optimize the combination of these three categories of nutrients. Comparison with similar blanks showed that nutrient biostimulation through nutrients enhanced the phenanthrene removal from soil slurry and this was proved by the previous studies [25-27]. The highest of phenanthrene removal efficiency was observed in run 1 with the presence of high level of KH2PO4 and NH4NO3 in mineral salt medium. The second run with the best removal efficiency was run 4 with high level of the same macronutrient as run 1. In these two runs the micro nutrients and trace elements conditions were not in the same form showing the importance of factors C and A as the macronutrients in phenanthrene biodegradation. A relation between mineralization rates of phenanthrene and the initial concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus as macronutrient has been reported before [28]. Da Silva et al. (2009) reported the improvement in bioremediation of coastal sand contaminated to crude oil by using commercial mineral NPK fertilizer [29]. Borresen and Rike (2007) showed that the concentration of phenanthrene in the soil amended with NP and biosolid was 1.7 and 2.9 times lower, respectively [30].

The relevant effects of eleven factors were sorted from the highest to the lowest in the Pareto chart presented in Figure 2a. The Pareto chart showed that A, B, C, D, G, H, J and K had positively affected phenanthrene degradation, whereas E, F and I had negative effects. All of these factors are in the right side of the t-value line in this chart showing the significant effect of them.

The positive effect of factors shows that the higher concentration of them has more efficiency in biodegradation. Among the eleven, eight factors had the positive effect on phenanthrene removal which confirms the biostimulation of phenanthrene biodegradation by nutrient addition, but Braddock et al. (1997) in their research for bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated arctic soils showed the most biostimulation in the less concentration of nutrients [31]. It may be related to growth inhibition in N and P rich soils [32]. An initial inhibition of bacterial growth by magnitude of 2 Log was seen in the population of consortium in the runs with high concentration of N and P, but it didn’t take too long. Besides in the other of our research with pure culture of bacteria, this reduction was about 3 Log. Lower inhibition of bacterial growth in the mix culture showed different responses for the diverse bacterial populations against to the environmental condition [32] and a need for optimum composition of macro, micro and trace nutrients. If the suitable ratio of nutrients does not supply, the key degrader microorganisms may become ineffective which leading to less progress in biodegradation [33]. After a short time the population of bacterial consortium increased and the maximum density was observed in the runs with higher removal efficiency which may be resulted from a more need of degrader bacteria to the nutrients composition provided in these runs.

Also in the Pareto chart, C was the most effective factor followed by showinpan>g the high effect of nitrogen and phosphorus respectively. Olaniran et al. (2006) and Margesin and Schinner (1999) reported the more biotransformation was seen in using nitrogen and phosphorus as fertilizer [34,35]. The main effect plot (Figure 2b) confirms the most effect of macronutrients of C and A too. The slope of NH4NO3 effect shows that the response of phenanthrene removal was sensitive to this factor regarding to dominant effect of nitrogen in biodegradation. Nitrogen in the form of NH4+ or NO3− is readily assimilated in bacterial metabolism [17]. Ferandez-Luqueno et al. (2009) showed that degradation of poly acryl amide caused to release of nitrogen which leading to increment of the concentration of it and promotion in PAH removal [36]. But Liebeg and Cutright (1999) in their investigation of the effect of macro/micro nutrient, reported that phosphorus was the dominant nutrient in PAH bioremediation [17]. The composition of the best run in their report was consisted of 3% nitrogen, 11% phosphorus and 75% sulfur. In our experiment the runs with 3-12% phosphorus on a dry weight basis had the higher efficiency but phosphorus was not the dominant nutrient. The amount of nitrogen in the runs with more biodegradation of phenanthrene (runs: 1, 3, 4, 6 and 7) was in the range of 67-87%. The analysis of variance confirms that factor C (as NH4NO3) with the effect of 59% was the most effective nutrient in phenanthrene biodegradation. According to Cookson (1995) the concentration of 150 mg of nitrogen and 30 mg phosphorus has been required for degradation of one gram of a theoretical hydrocarbon into cellular material [37]. Betancur – Galvis et al. (2006) used nitrogen in the concentration of tenfold of phosphorus in biostimulation of PAH contaminated saline–alkaline soils [14]. Atagana et al. (2003) showed more removal of creosote in biostimulation of contaminated soil with lower amount of nitrogen but the more microbial growth was in the higher amount of it [38].

The negative effect of iron and copper (factors E and I) may be related to the lack of requirement of them by the dominant biodegrader bacteria in this experiment [17]. The need for micronutrient or trace element is very different in diverse microorganisms. In our study nutrient solution with composition of: 75% N, 10% P and 14% K was the best mineral salt medium for phenanthrene biodegradation.

Analysis of variance showed that after the factors A and B with the effect of 12.3 and 9.2%, factor C is the most effective factor among the cosidred variables. The total effect of macro, micro and trace nutrients were 80.5, 12.9 and 6.6%, respectively.

The slope of the parameters in the main effect plot showed that all of them had signpan>ificant effect in the process and the analysis of ANOVAs indicating that they are significantly different from zero at the 95.0% confidence level too. The R-Squared statistic indicates that the model as fitted, explains 99.9218% of the variability in removal. The optimal settings of the experimental factors have been determined and are displayed in the summary in Table 6. Plackett-Burman design has great potential for screening of several variables by assessing the relative importance of these parameters.

Table 6

Factor settings at optimum conditions determines by Plackett-Burman design

Factor		Setting
Factor_A	KH2PO4	0.996965	2.99 ( g/L)
Factor_B	K2HPO4	−0.850538	0.6868 ( g/L)
Factor_C	NH4NO3	0.997797	6.98 ( g/L)
Factor_D	MgSO4	−0.995396	0.1007 ( g/L)
Factor_E	FeCL3	−0.996413	0.0103 ( g/L)
Factor_F	NaCl	−0.99606	0.011556 ( g/L)
Factor_G	ZnSO4.H2O	0.997174	0.0499576 (mg/L)
Factor_H	MnSO4.H2O	0.984212	3.96858 (mg/L)
Factor_I	CuSO4.5H2O	0.879905	0.37718 (mg/L)
Factor_J	FeSO4.7H2O	−0.958447	0. 0305687 (mg/L)
Factor_K	H3BO3	0.999567	12.998 (mg/L)
	Na2MoO4		0.999 × 10 −2 (mg/L)
	CoCl2		0.1 (mg/L)
	NiCl2		0.2 (mg/L)

Factor settings at optimum n class="Chemical">conditions determines by Plackett-Burman design

Conclusion

Biostimulation of PAHs contaminated soils through nutrient addition enhance the biodegradation rate in the process. Our result on statistical screening of media components by Plackett–Burman design proved the advantages of selecting significant media components while phenantrene biodegradation with a bacterial consortium was investigated. The suitable conditions for phenanthrene removal were: as g/L 6.98 NH4NO3, 2.99 KH2PO4, 0.6868 K2HPO4, 0.1007 MgSO4,0.0103 FeCL3, 0.011556 NaCl, and as mg/ L 12.998 H3BO3, 3.96858 MnSO4.H2O,0.37718 CuSO4.5H2O, 0.2 NiCl2, 0.1 CoCl2, 0.0499576 ZnSO4.H2O, 0. 0305687 FeSO4.7H2O and 0.999 × 10 −2 Na2MoO4. Plackett–Burman design has good potential for preliminary optimization and more accurate quantitative analysis of the effect of great number of variables for phenanthrene biodegradation.