Literature DB >> 25610543

First karyotype data on the family Myerslopiidae (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Cicadomorpha).

Natalia V Golub1, Valentina G Kuznetsova1, Roman A Rakitov2.   

Abstract

In the first cytogenetic study of the recently proposed family Myerslopiidae the male karyotype of Mapucheachilensis (Nielson, 1996) was analyzed using conventional chromosome staining, AgNOR- and C-bandings, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 18S rDNA and (TTAGG) n telomeric probes. A karyotype of 2n = 16 + XY, NOR on a medium-sized pair of autosomes, subterminal location of C-heterochromatin, and presence of (TTAGG) n telomeric sequence were determined. Additionally, the male internal reproductive system was studied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auchenorrhyncha; C-heterochromatin; Cicadomorpha; Hemiptera; Karyotype; Mapucheachilensis; Membracoidea; Myerslopiidae; NOR; TTAGG telomeric sequence; rDNA

Year:  2014        PMID: 25610543      PMCID: PMC4296716          DOI: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v8i4.8813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Cytogenet        ISSN: 1993-0771            Impact factor:   1.800


Introduction

The family includes three recent genera of cicadomorphan with 19 species in New Zealand and temperate Chile (Szwedo 2004). Myerslopiids are small, heavily sclerotized, flightless insects dwelling in leaf litter. The family status of this group, previously classified as a subfamily within PageBreakor a tribe within the cicadellid subfamily Ulopinae, was proposed by Hamilton (1999), who argued from morphological evidence that it represents the basal branch of the superfamily (leafhoppers and treehoppers) and shares multiple plesiomorphic characters with (cicadas), (froghoppers), or both. This hypothesis received some support from molecular phylogenetic analyses, which recovered myerslopiids outside the rest of (Dietrich et al. 2001, Cryan 2005). Therefore, additional data on these poorly known insects are of considerable interest. We describe here the karyotype of (Nielson, 1996), the data representing the first cytogenetic report on the family .

Material and methods

Four adult males of were collected by the third author in Chile, P.N. Puyehue, Anticura (40.6667°S, 72.1742°W) on 15–17 January 2014 from leaf litter between creeping stems of (Hooker & Arnott, 1833). Specimens were fixed in 3:1 fixative (96% ethanol: glacial acetic acid) and stored at +4°C. Testes were dissected in a drop of 45% acetic acid and squashed. The cover slip was removed using dry ice. Chromosome staining techniques used were as follows: the Feulgen-Giemsa method (Grozeva and Nokkala 1996) for visualization of standard karyotype; Ag-NOR banding (Howell and Black 1980) for visualization of nucleolus organizing regions, NORs; C-banding (Sumner 1972) for revealing constitutive heterochromatin; and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 18S rDNA and (TTAGG) telomeric probes for detecting the telomeric sequence and the number and chromosomal location of rRNA gene sites (Schwarzacher and Heslop-Harrison 2000). Chromosome slides were analyzed under a Leica DM 6000 B microscope; images were taken with a Leica DFC 345 FX camera using Leica Application Suite 3.7 software with an Image Overlay module. The classification of cicadomorphan accepted in this paper follows Dietrich (2005).

Results

Reproductive system

In adult males, the reproductive system consisted of a pair of testes, pair of seminal vesicles, and pair of accessory glands (Fig. 1). In two males, the number of follicles was the same in both testes, 6+6, but in two other males it was 6+5 and 6+4 respectively. The seminal vesicles were cylindrical in shape, fused almost throughout their entire lengths. The accessory glands were oval in shape and narrowed apically.
Figure 1.

Male reproductive system of . t.f. testicular follicles (4 and 6 in different testes); v.d. vasa differentia s.v. seminal vesicle; a.g. accessory gland; c.d.e. common ejaculatory duct.

Male reproductive system of . t.f. testicular follicles (4 and 6 in different testes); v.d. vasa differentia s.v. seminal vesicle; a.g. accessory gland; c.d.e. common ejaculatory duct. Male karyotype of . a metaphase I, n = 8AA + XY b diakinesis, largest bivalent with two chiasmata c diplotene, 5 bivalents with two chiasmata each d metaphase II with the largest chromosome in the center of a ring formed by autosomes. Note chromatin associations between non-homological chromosomes e metaphase I showing associations between bivalents f anaphase II with lagging chromosomes (arrows) g diplotene (C-banding) showing terminal C-bands in chromosomes h early prophase (NOR-banding) showing argyrophilic granules associated with autosomes i–k diplotenes (i, j) and mitotic metaphase (k) after FISH with rDNA-probe (green signals) and (TTAGG) telomeric probe (red signals). rDNA sites are located on a medium-sized pair of autosomes. Bar = 10µm.

Standard karyotype

showed a karyotype of 2n = 16 + XY. At MI, 8 bivalents of autosomes and an XY-pair were present (Fig. 2a). One of the bivalents was very large and the others gradually decreased in size. The autosomal bivalents formed one or two subterminal or occasionally interstitial chiasmata (Fig. 2b). In some nuclei, almost all bivalents appeared as rings, evidencing the presence of two subterminal chiasmata (Fig. 2c). At MII, the chromosomes tended to form a ring with the largest bivalent at its center (Fig. 2d). In some cells, non-homological chromosomal associations (Fig. 2d, e) and lagging chromosomes (Fig. 2f) were observed.
Figure 2.

Male karyotype of . a metaphase I, n = 8AA + XY b diakinesis, largest bivalent with two chiasmata c diplotene, 5 bivalents with two chiasmata each d metaphase II with the largest chromosome in the center of a ring formed by autosomes. Note chromatin associations between non-homological chromosomes e metaphase I showing associations between bivalents f anaphase II with lagging chromosomes (arrows) g diplotene (C-banding) showing terminal C-bands in chromosomes h early prophase (NOR-banding) showing argyrophilic granules associated with autosomes i–k diplotenes (i, j) and mitotic metaphase (k) after FISH with rDNA-probe (green signals) and (TTAGG) telomeric probe (red signals). rDNA sites are located on a medium-sized pair of autosomes. Bar = 10µm.

C- and AgNOR-bandings and FISH

After C-banding, the majority of bivalents showed C-blocks at the ends of chromosomes (Fig. 2g). In early prophase cells, a large Ag-positive mass connected with autosomes was identified; in some cases, nucleolar material was present as multiple argyrophilic bodies (Fig. 2h). The 18S rDNA FISH probe localized ribosomal clusters near the ends of one of the medium-sized bivalents (Fig. 2i, j). The (TTAGG) telomeric FISH probe produced bright fluorescent signals at the ends of chromosomes (Fig. 2i, j, k).

Discussion

The number of testicular follicles is generally characteristic of an insect species, although variation between the two testes of the same male has occasionally been reported PageBreakPageBreak(Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 2006, Kuznetsova et al. 2010). The phylogenetic importance of this character in has been discussed (Emelyanov and Kuznetsova 1983, D’Urso et al. 2005, Kuznetsova et al. 2009, 2010). Despite some intraindividual variation observed in the four examined males, 6 follicles per testis predominated and can thus be considered characteristic of . In , this number varies from 3 to 14, with low numbers (6 and 4) predominating (Bednarczyk 1993). In other families of , testes with 9 follicles have been recorded in (Kuznetsova and Kirillova 1993) and testes with 4, 6 and 8 follicles in (Emelyanov and Kuznetsova 1983). The number of follicles is higher in other superfamilies of cicadomorphan : 12-35 in (Emelyanov and Kuznetsova 1983) and very high (over 100) in (Glasgow 1908, Moulds 2005). Among , chromosome numbers in males vary from 2n = 7(6 + X) to 2n = 27(26 + X) and both X(0) and XY sex chromosome systems occur, the latter being found only occasionally (Kirillova 1988, Wei 2010, Juan 2011). The complement of 2n = 18 (16 + XX/XY), determined for , has been previously described only in two cicadellids, Evans, 1941 from the subfamily Ulopinae (Whitten 1965) and (Walker, 1858) from Deltocephalinae (as Distant, 1908 and Distant, 1908, see Kirillova 1988). This karyotype has not been recorded so far among , , , or (Kirillova 1988, Kuznetsova and Kirillova 1993, Tian and Yuan 1997, Perepelov and Bugrov 2002, Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 2013). Therefore, in both the karyotype and the number of follicles, falls within the spectrum of variation observed in . Other cytogenetic characters have so far been examined in only a few representatives of cicadomorphan and thus do not inform on the relationships of . was found to have small subterminal C-blocks, the pattern described, with the exception of large blocks in Drosopoulos & Remane, 2000 (: ) (Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 2013), in all previously examined species of (Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 2013) and (Perepelov and Bugrov 2002), which are the only other cicadomorphans in which the amount and distribution of C-heterochromatin have been studied. The amount and distribution of C-heterochromatin were found to vary among species of Stål, 1864 (Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 2013). In , rDNA loci were detected by FISH on one of the medium-sized pairs of autosomes, this location being confirmed by AgNOR-staining, which suggested presence of a single autosomal NOR (per haploid set). The latter technique has previously been used to demonstrate variation in the number and position of NORs in four genera of (Castanhole et al. 2010, Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 2013); for one of these genera, , the results have been confirmed using FISH (Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 2013). The telomeric sequence (TTAGG)n, identified in PageBreak, is known to be characteristic of the majority of insect groups and is considered to be ancestral for (Frydrychová et al. 2004, Vitková et al. 2005) and as a whole (Lukhtanov and Kuznetsova 2010). Among , this canonical motif is not present (lost) in the advanced heteropteran infraorders and (Grozeva et al. 2011), but has been reported in (Stal, 1854) from the more basal heteropteran infraorder (Kuznetsova et al. 2012), in coccids (Mohan et al. 2011), aphids (Monti et al. 2011) and the auchenorrhynchan genus (Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 2013).
  11 in total

1.  Phylogeny of the major lineages of Membracoidea (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha) based on 28S rDNA sequences.

Authors:  C H Dietrich; R A Rakitov; J L Holmes; W C Black
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Constitutive heterochromatin in karyotypes of two Cicadidae species from Japan (Cicadoidea, Hemiptera).

Authors:  Eugeny Perepelov; Alexander G Bugrov; Anna Maryańska-Nadachowska
Journal:  Folia Biol (Krakow)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.432

3.  Phylogenetic distribution of TTAGG telomeric repeats in insects.

Authors:  Radmila Frydrychová; Petr Grossmann; Pavel Trubac; Magda Vítková; Frantisek Marec
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.166

Review 4.  [What gene and chromosomes say about the origin and evolution of insects and other arthropods].

Authors:  V A Lukhtanov; V G Kuznetsova
Journal:  Genetika       Date:  2010-09

5.  The evolutionary origin of insect telomeric repeats, (TTAGG)n.

Authors:  Magda Vítková; Jirí Král; Walther Traut; Jan Zrzavý; Frantisek Marec
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin.

Authors:  A T Sumner
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method.

Authors:  W M Howell; D A Black
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1980-08-15

8.  Presence of a functional (TTAGG)(n) telomere-telomerase system in aphids.

Authors:  Valentina Monti; Monica Giusti; Davide Bizzaro; Gian Carlo Manicardi; Mauro Mandrioli
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Meiotic chromosomes and nucleolar behavior in testicular cells of the grassland spittlebugs Deois flavopicta, Mahanarva fimbriolata and Notozulia entreriana (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha).

Authors:  Márcia Maria Urbanin Castanhole; Luis Lênin Vicente Pereira; Hederson Vinicius de Souza; José Raul Valério; Leonardo Rodrigues Barbosa; Mary Massumi Itoyama
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.771

10.  Karyotypes, male meiosis and comparative FISH mapping of 18S ribosomal DNA and telomeric (TTAGG) n repeat in eight species of true bugs (Hemiptera, Heteroptera).

Authors:  S Grozeva; V G Kuznetsova; B A Anokhin
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.800

View more
  5 in total

1.  First evidence for (TTAGG)n telomeric sequence and sex chromosome post-reduction in Coleorrhyncha (Insecta, Hemiptera).

Authors:  Valentina G Kuznetsova; Snejana M Grozeva; Viktor Hartung; Boris A Anokhin
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.800

2.  Karyotype stability in the family Issidae (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha) revealed by chromosome techniques and FISH with telomeric (TTAGG)n and 18S rDNA probes.

Authors:  Anna Maryańska-Nadachowska; Boris A Anokhin; Vladimir M Gnezdilov; Valentina G Kuznetsova
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.800

3.  The presence of the ancestral insect telomeric motif in kissing bugs (Triatominae) rules out the hypothesis of its loss in evolutionarily advanced Heteroptera (Cimicomorpha).

Authors:  Sebastián Pita; Francisco Panzera; Pablo Mora; Jesús Vela; Teresa Palomeque; Pedro Lorite
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.800

4.  Chromosomal distribution of interstitial telomeric sequences as signs of evolution through chromosome fusion in six species of the giant water bugs (Hemiptera, Belostoma).

Authors:  Mónica G Chirino; Martina Dalíková; František R Marec; María J Bressa
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  Comparative cytogenetics of Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera, Homoptera): a review.

Authors:  Valentina Kuznetsova; Dora Aguin-Pombo
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.