Literature DB >> 25609858

Comparison of training in neonatal resuscitation using self inflating bag and T-piece resuscitator.

S S Mathai1, K M Adhikari2, A Rajeev3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both the self inflating bag and the T-piece resuscitator are recommended for neonatal resuscitation, but many health care workers are unfamiliar with using the latter. A prospective, comparative, observational study was done to determine the ease and effectiveness of training of health care personnel in the two devices using infant training manikins.
METHODS: 100 health care workers, who had no prior formal training in neonatal resuscitation, were divided into small groups and trained in the use of the two devices by qualified trainers. Assessment of cognitive skills was done by pre and post MCQs. Psychomotor skill was assessed post training on manikins using a 10-point objective score. Acceptance by users was ascertained by questionnaire. Assessments were also done after 24 h and 3 months. Comparison was done by Chi square and paired t-tests.
RESULTS: Pre-training cognitive tests increased from 3.77 (+1.58) to 6.99 (+1.28) on day of training which was significant. Post training assessment of psychomotor skills showed significantly higher initial scores for the T-piece group (7.07 + 2.57) on day of training. Reassessment after 24 h showed significant improvement in cognitive scores (9.89 + 1.24) and psychomotor scores in both groups (8.86 + 1.42 for self inflating bag and 9.70 + 0.57 for T-piece resuscitator). After 3-6 months the scores in both domains showed some decline which was not statistically significant. User acceptability was the same for both devices.
CONCLUSION: It is equally easy to train health care workers in both devices. Both groups showed good short term recall and both devices were equally acceptable to the users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neonatal resuscitation; Self inflating bag; T-piece resuscitator

Year:  2014        PMID: 25609858      PMCID: PMC4297837          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  5 in total

1.  The resuscitation greats. Henning Ruben MD, FFARCS(I), FFARCS. The Ruben valve and the AMBU bag.

Authors:  Peter Baskett; John Zorab
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 2.  Comparison of the T-piece resuscitator with other neonatal manual ventilation devices: a qualitative review.

Authors:  Colin Patrick Hawkes; C Anthony Ryan; Eugene Michael Dempsey
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Neonatal resuscitation: are your trainees performing as you think they are? A retrospective review of a structured resuscitation assessment for neonatal medical trainees over an 8-year period.

Authors:  Jonathan Cusack; Joe Fawke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Sustained inflations: comparing three neonatal resuscitation devices.

Authors:  Claus Klingenberg; Jennifer A Dawson; Angela Gerber; C Omar F Kamlin; Peter G Davis; Colin J Morley
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Video recording as a means of evaluating neonatal resuscitation performance.

Authors:  D N Carbine; N N Finer; E Knodel; W Rich
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.124

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Letter to editor.

Authors:  Subhash Chandra Shaw; Sweta Mukherjee
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Standardised formal resuscitation training programmes for reducing mortality and morbidity in newborn infants.

Authors:  Eugene Dempsey; Mohan Pammi; Anthony C Ryan; Keith J Barrington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-04

Review 3.  Simulation in Neonatal Resuscitation.

Authors:  Aisling A Garvey; Eugene M Dempsey
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.418

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.