| Literature DB >> 25607952 |
Yingdong Bi1, Wei Li2, Jialei Xiao2, Hong Lin3, Ming Liu2, Miao Liu2, Xiaoyan Luan4, Bixian Zhang2, Xuejun Xie5, Donglin Guo6, Yongcai Lai2.
Abstract
Isoflavone, a group of secondary metabolites in soybean, is beneficial to human health. Improving isoflavone content in soybean seeds has become one of the most important breeding objectives. However, the narrow genetic base of soybean cultivars hampered crop improvement. Wild soybean is an extraordinarily important gene pool for soybean breeding. In order to select an optimal germplasm for breeding programs to increase isoflavone concentration, 36 F1 soybean progenies from different parental accessions (cultivars, wild, Semi-wild and Interspecific) with various total isoflavone (TIF) concentration (High, Middle, Low) were analyzed for their isoflavone content. Results showed that male parents, except for Cultivars, showed positive GCA effects. In particular, wild soybean had higher positive GCA effects for TIF concentration. Both MP and BP heterosis value declined in the hybrid in which male parents were wild soybean, semi-wild soybean, interspecific offspring and cultivar in turn. In general, combining ability and heterosis in hybrids which had relative higher TIF concentration level parents showed better performance than those which had lower TIF concentration level parents. These results indicated characteristics of isoflavone content were mainly governed by additive type of gene action, and wild relatives could be utilized for breeding of soybean cultivars with this trait. A promising combination was found as the best potential hybrid for isoflavone content improvement.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25607952 PMCID: PMC4301644 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114827
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Origin and pedigree of parental soybean lines used to generate 36 F1 hybrids in this study.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
| Longpin 05-277 | CBI HAAS | unknown | Cultivar | H | 3955±142 |
|
| Hefeng 47 | CBI HAAS | Hefeng35×Gong84112-1-3 | Cultivar | M | 2341±119 |
|
| Heinong 35 | CBI HAAS | Heinong16×SSCY | Cultivar | L | 1341±58 |
|
| ||||||
|
| W01-177 | GBWS HAAS | Glycine soja | Wild soybean | H | 3682±111 |
|
| W01-355 | GBWS HAAS | Glycine soja | Wild soybean | M | 2371±125 |
|
| W01-694 | GBWS HAAS | Glycine soja | Wild soybean | L | 1770±24 |
|
| W01-491 | CBI HAAS | Landrace | Semi-wild soybean | H | 4649±289 |
|
| W01-175 | CBI HAAS | Landrace | Semi-wild soybean | M | 3126±195 |
|
| W01-555 | CBI HAAS | Landrace | Semi-wild soybean | L | 938±88 |
|
| Longpin01-122 | CBI HAAS | Strain | Interspecific offspring | H | 3583±102 |
|
| Longpin05-67 | CBI HAAS | Strain | Interspecific offspring | M | 2116±67 |
|
| ZYD 5531 | CBI HAAS | Strain | Interspecific offspring | L | 1668±13 |
|
| Heinong37 | SRI HAAS | H77-7594×H78-8391 | Cultivar | H | 3397±173 |
|
| Hefeng39 | HI HAAS | 87-1004×Hejiao87-19 | Cultivar | M | 2673±54 |
|
| Long05-372 | CBI HAAS | unknown | Cultivar | L | 1961±76 |
Figure 1Average total isoflavone (TIF) concentration (μg/g) of hybrids gained by fifteen parents.
Male parents were divided into four groups which are cultivars, wild, Semi-wild and Interspecific offspring based on plant taxonomy. Female parents comprised 3 lines each based on TIF concentration which is H (high), M (middle) and L (low).
Mean squares from the combined analysis of variances for Isoflavone Content for Parents.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Isoflavone Content Classification | ||||
| Duncan( | ||||
| low | 12 | 2084.81 | ||
| middle | 12 | 2236.53 | ||
| high | 12 | 3373.70 | ||
| Male | Sig. | .668 | 1.000 | |
| Species | ||||
| Duncan( | ||||
| cultivar | 9 | 1947.03 | ||
| interspecific | 9 | 2023.72 | ||
| semi-wild | 9 | 2892.10 | ||
| wild | 9 | 3397.19 | ||
| .830 | .165 | |||
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares, The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 732156.927.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 12.000.
b Alpha = .05.
Mean squares from the combined analysis of variances for the Isoflavone content measured.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Replications | 95347.62 | 2 | 47673.81 | 0.6898 | 0.5051 |
| Genotypes | 116936974 | 35 | 3341056 | 48.3402 | 0.0001 |
| Female | 18565000 | 2 | 9282500 | 9.3866 | 0.0011 |
| Male | 76615947 | 11 | 6965086 | 7.0432 | 0.0001 |
| Female×Male | 21756028 | 22 | 988910.4 | 14.3081 | 0.0001 |
| Male ICC (Isoflavone Content Classification) | 6188333.317 | 2 | 3094166.659 | 4.226 | .025 |
| Male S (Species) | 13269642.095 | 3 | 4423214.032 | 7.898 | .001 |
| Female ICC×Male ICC | 1112698.351 | 4 | 278174.588 | .380 | .821 |
| Female ICC×Male S | 359283.949 | 6 | 59880.658 | .107 | .995 |
| Error | 4838080 | 70 | 69115.43 | ||
| Total | 121870402 | 107 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Variance component estimates | |||||
| δ2 f | 664019.5204 | ||||
| δ2 m | 230377.4892 | ||||
| δ2 fm | 306598.3104 | ||||
| δ2 e | 69115.4336 | ||||
| Proportional contribution to total variances | |||||
| δ2 f+δ2 m/δ2 G | 74.47% | ||||
| δ2 fm/δ2 G | 25.53% | ||||
| Broad Sense heritability (h2b) | 94.56% | ||||
| Narrow Sense heritability (h2n) | 70.42% | ||||
df = degrees of freedom.
* Significant at P<0.05.
** Significant at P<0.01.
Estimates of general combining ability (GCA) effects for the 15 parents of soybean species and specific combining ability (SCA) effects for Isoflavone Content for the 36 F1 hybrids across.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Longpin 05-277 | Hefeng 47 | Heinong 35 | GCA values | |||
|
| H | W01-177 | 42.4635 | −6.864 | −35.5995 | 65.2636 |
| M | W01-355 | 17.4661 | 10.3447 | −27.8107 | 38.2429 | |
| L | W01-694 | −0.991 | −3.1401 | 4.1312 | 16.391 | |
|
| H | W01-491 | −14.7808 | −4.3561 | 19.1369 | 6.2133 |
| M | W01-175 | −21.2601 | 5.593 | 15.667 | 23.3311 | |
| L | W01-555 | 9.0768 | 14.8707 | −23.9475 | 2.0995 | |
|
| H | Longpin01-122 | −6.3931 | −1.2654 | 7.6585 | −40.7505 |
| M | Longpin05-67 | −24.9118 | −8.9175 | 33.8293 | −35.9058 | |
| L | ZYD 5531 | 12.0417 | 1.2942 | −13.3358 | 8.7361 | |
|
| H | Heinong37 | 7.6191 | 13.608 | −21.227 | −2.0869 |
| M | Hefeng39 | −14.8103 | −1.9045 | 16.7149 | −38.9488 | |
| L | Long05-372 | −5.5198 | −19.263 | 24.7828 | −42.5856 | |
| GCA values | 19.2844 | 0.9876 | −20.272 | |||
Figure 2Estimates of mid parents (MP) and better parent (BP) heterosis (%) for total isoflavone (TIF) concentration in 36 hybrids.
Combinations were classified based on plant taxonomy of parents. C cultivars, W wild, S semi-wild, I interspecific offspring.