PURPOSE: to assess the efficacy of associating the microfracture technique with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in the treatment of chondral lesions to promote acceleration and optimization of the healing process compared with the traditional microfracture approach. METHODS: from September 2011 to August 2012, 20 patients (9 males and 11 females, aged 30-55 years) were treated. All presented with chondral lesions of the medial femoral condyle of the knee and a pain duration ranging from 8 to 12 months. The patients were randomized into two groups (A and B). Group A was treated with the microfracture technique and a total of three intra-articular injections of PRP. Group B was treated with microfractures alone. Clinical follow-up was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Clinical function was assessed on the basis of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: the patients in group A had a mean baseline IKDC score of 31.2, which rose to 84.2 at 12 months. The IKDC scores in group B were at 30.1 at baseline and 81 at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: the results of our study suggest that functional recovery and resolution of pain are obtained more quickly in PRP-treated patients. We also observed a better functional outcome in the patients treated with the combination of PRP and microfractures, even at 12 months, although the difference was not statistically significant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level II, randomized clinical study.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: to assess the efficacy of associating the microfracture technique with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in the treatment of chondral lesions to promote acceleration and optimization of the healing process compared with the traditional microfracture approach. METHODS: from September 2011 to August 2012, 20 patients (9 males and 11 females, aged 30-55 years) were treated. All presented with chondral lesions of the medial femoral condyle of the knee and a pain duration ranging from 8 to 12 months. The patients were randomized into two groups (A and B). Group A was treated with the microfracture technique and a total of three intra-articular injections of PRP. Group B was treated with microfractures alone. Clinical follow-up was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Clinical function was assessed on the basis of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: the patients in group A had a mean baseline IKDC score of 31.2, which rose to 84.2 at 12 months. The IKDC scores in group B were at 30.1 at baseline and 81 at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: the results of our study suggest that functional recovery and resolution of pain are obtained more quickly in PRP-treated patients. We also observed a better functional outcome in the patients treated with the combination of PRP and microfractures, even at 12 months, although the difference was not statistically significant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level II, randomized clinical study.
Authors: Allan Mishra; Padmaja Tummala; Aaron King; Byung Lee; Mark Kraus; Victor Tse; Christopher R Jacobs Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Surena Namdari; Keith Baldwin; Okechukwu Anakwenze; Min-Jung Park; G Russell Huffman; Brian J Sennett Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Douglas L Cerynik; Gabriel E Lewullis; Brian C Joves; Michael P Palmer; James A Tom Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Niall A Smyth; Christopher D Murawski; Lisa A Fortier; Brian J Cole; John G Kennedy Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2013-05-11 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Kai Mithoefer; Timothy McAdams; Riley J Williams; Peter C Kreuz; Bert R Mandelbaum Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Antonio Marmotti; Roberto Rossi; Filippo Castoldi; Eliana Roveda; Gianni Michielon; Giuseppe M Peretti Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 3.411