Youichi Yasui1, Adi Wollstein2, Christopher D Murawski2, John G Kennedy3. 1. Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Numerous basic science articles have published evidence supporting the use of biologic augmentation in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). However, a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical outcomes of those treatment modalities in OLT has yet to be published. The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence-based overview of clinical outcomes following biologic augmentation to surgical treatments for OLT. DESIGN: A comprehensive literature review was performed. Two commonly used surgical techniques for the treatment of OLT-bone marrow stimulation and osteochondral autograft transfer-are first introduced. The review describes the operative indications, step-by- step operative procedure, clinical outcomes, and concerns associated with each treatment. A review of the currently published basic science and clinical evidence on biologic augmentation in the surgical treatments for OLT, including platelet-rich plasma, concentrated bone marrow aspirate, and scaffold-based therapy follows. RESULTS: Biologic agents and scaffold-based therapies appear to be promising agents, capable of improving both clinical and radiological outcomes in OLT. Nevertheless, variable production methods of these biologic augmentations confound the interpretation of clinical outcomes of cases treated with these agents. CONCLUSIONS: Current clinical evidence supports the use of biologic agents in OLT cases. Nonetheless, well-designed clinical trials with patient-specific, validated and objective outcome measurements are warranted to develop standardized clinical guidelines for the use of biologic augmentation for the treatment of OLT in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: Numerous basic science articles have published evidence supporting the use of biologic augmentation in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). However, a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical outcomes of those treatment modalities in OLT has yet to be published. The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence-based overview of clinical outcomes following biologic augmentation to surgical treatments for OLT. DESIGN: A comprehensive literature review was performed. Two commonly used surgical techniques for the treatment of OLT-bone marrow stimulation and osteochondral autograft transfer-are first introduced. The review describes the operative indications, step-by- step operative procedure, clinical outcomes, and concerns associated with each treatment. A review of the currently published basic science and clinical evidence on biologic augmentation in the surgical treatments for OLT, including platelet-rich plasma, concentrated bone marrow aspirate, and scaffold-based therapy follows. RESULTS: Biologic agents and scaffold-based therapies appear to be promising agents, capable of improving both clinical and radiological outcomes in OLT. Nevertheless, variable production methods of these biologic augmentations confound the interpretation of clinical outcomes of cases treated with these agents. CONCLUSIONS: Current clinical evidence supports the use of biologic agents in OLT cases. Nonetheless, well-designed clinical trials with patient-specific, validated and objective outcome measurements are warranted to develop standardized clinical guidelines for the use of biologic augmentation for the treatment of OLT in clinical practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
autologous osteochondral transplantation; biologic; bone marrow stimulations; concentrated bone marrow aspirate; osteochondral lesions of talus; platelet-rich plasma; scaffold-based therapy
Authors: Joshua Lamb; Christopher D Murawski; Timothy W Deyer; John G Kennedy Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Niall A Smyth; Christopher D Murawski; Lisa A Fortier; Brian J Cole; John G Kennedy Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2013-05-11 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Vicki L Davis; Alaeddin B Abukabda; Nicholas M Radio; Paula A Witt-Enderby; William P Clafshenkel; J Vito Cairone; James L Rutkowski Journal: J Oral Implantol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 1.779
Authors: Samuel B Adams; Lori A Setton; Richard D Bell; Mark E Easley; Janet L Huebner; Thomas Stabler; Virginia B Kraus; Elizabeth M Leimer; Steven A Olson; Dana L Nettles Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: Dexter Seow; Youichi Yasui; Ian D Hutchinson; Eoghan T Hurley; Yoshiharu Shimozono; John G Kennedy Journal: Cartilage Date: 2017-06-02 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Juan Manuel López-Alcorocho; Isabel Guillén-Vicente; Elena Rodríguez-Iñigo; Ramón Navarro; Rosa Caballero-Santos; Marta Guillén-Vicente; Mercedes Casqueiro; Tomás F Fernández-Jaén; Fernando Sanz; Santiago Arauz; Steve Abelow; Pedro Guillén-García Journal: Cartilage Date: 2019-03-17 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Rebecca M Irwin; Yoshiharu Shimozono; Youichi Yasui; Robin Megill; Timothy W Deyer; John G Kennedy Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2018-08-23
Authors: Youichi Yasui; Charles P Hannon; Ethan J Fraser; Jakob Ackermann; Lorraine Boakye; Keir A Ross; Gavin L Duke; Yoshiharu Shimozono; John G Kennedy Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-02-12