Literature DB >> 25605760

Competitive science: is competition ruining science?

Ferric C Fang1, Arturo Casadevall2.   

Abstract

Science has always been a competitive undertaking. Despite recognition of the benefits of cooperation and team science, reduced availability of funding and jobs has made science more competitive than ever. Here we consider the benefits of competition in providing incentives to scientists and the adverse effects of competition on resource sharing, research integrity, and creativity. The history of science shows that transformative discoveries often occur in the absence of competition, which only emerges once fields are established and goals are defined. Measures to encourage collaboration and ameliorate competition in the scientific enterprise are discussed.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25605760      PMCID: PMC4363426          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.02939-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  45 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of plaque: an analysis of the Yersin-Kitasato controversy.

Authors:  D J Bibel; T H Chen
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1976-09

2.  Combating scientific misconduct.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  An unwelcome discovery. Walter DeNino was a young lab technician who analyzed data for his mentor, Eric Poehlman. What he found was that Poehlman was not the scientist he appeared to be.

Authors:  Jeneen Interlandi
Journal:  N Y Times Mag       Date:  2006-10-22

4.  [The mechanism of diphtheria immunity and tetanus immunity in animals. 1890].

Authors:  E von Behring; S Kitasato
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.407

5.  Is the Nobel Prize good for science?

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws.

Authors:  Bruce Alberts; Marc W Kirschner; Shirley Tilghman; Harold Varmus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phagosome extrusion and host-cell survival after Cryptococcus neoformans phagocytosis by macrophages.

Authors:  Mauricio Alvarez; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins.

Authors:  Sang-Youl Park; Pauline Fung; Noriyuki Nishimura; Davin R Jensen; Hiroaki Fujii; Yang Zhao; Shelley Lumba; Julia Santiago; Americo Rodrigues; Tsz-Fung F Chow; Simon E Alfred; Dario Bonetta; Ruth Finkelstein; Nicholas J Provart; Darrell Desveaux; Pedro L Rodriguez; Peter McCourt; Jian-Kang Zhu; Julian I Schroeder; Brian F Volkman; Sean R Cutler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Expulsion of live pathogenic yeast by macrophages.

Authors:  Hansong Ma; Joanne E Croudace; David A Lammas; Robin C May
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Creativity in art and science: are there two cultures?

Authors:  Nancy C Andreasen; Kanchna Ramchandran
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.986

View more
  20 in total

1.  (A)Historical science.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help.

Authors:  Leonid Tiokhin; Minhua Yan; Thomas J H Morgan
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-01-28

3.  Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game.

Authors:  Stefano Balietti; Robert L Goldstone; Dirk Helbing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Opinion: Authors overestimate their contribution to scientific work, demonstrating a strong bias.

Authors:  Noa Herz; Orrie Dan; Nitzan Censor; Yair Bar-Haim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Impacted science: impact is not importance.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Field Science--the Nature and Utility of Scientific Fields.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 7.867

7.  Individual motivation and threat indicators of collaboration readiness in scientific knowledge producing teams: a scoping review and domain analysis.

Authors:  Gaetano R Lotrecchiano; Trudy R Mallinson; Tommy Leblanc-Beaudoin; Lisa S Schwartz; Danielle Lazar; Holly J Falk-Krzesinski
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2016-05

8.  Article-level assessment of influence and translation in biomedical research.

Authors:  George M Santangelo
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Revolutionary Science.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures.

Authors:  Federico Bianchi; Francisco Grimaldo; Giangiacomo Bravo; Flaminio Squazzoni
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.