Maki Nishimura1, Sachi Tanaka1, Fumiaki Ihara1, Yoshikage Muroi2, Junya Yamagishi3, Hidefumi Furuoka2, Yutaka Suzuki4, Yoshifumi Nishikawa1. 1. National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan. 2. Department of Basic Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan. 3. Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, North 20, West 10 Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0020, JAPAN. 4. Department of Medical Genome Science, University of Tokyo, Room 032, Sougou Research Complex, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8562, Japan.
Abstract
Neospora caninum is a protozoan parasite that causes neurological disorders in dogs and cattle. It can cause nonsuppurative meningoencephalitis and a variety of neuronal symptoms are observed, particularly in dogs. However, the pathogenic mechanism, including the relationship between the parasite distribution and the clinical signs, is unclear. In this study, to understand the pathogenic mechanism of neosporosis, parasite distribution and lesions were assessed in the brain of mice infected with N. caninum (strain Nc-1). Host gene expression was also analyzed with RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). The histopathological lesions in the frontal lobe and the medulla oblongata were significantly more severe in symptomatic mice than in asymptomatic mice, although no association between the severity of the lesions and parasite numbers was found. In infected mice, the expression of 772 mouse brain genes was upregulated. A GOstat analysis predicted that the upregulated genes were involved in the host immune response. Genes whose expression correlated positively and negatively with parasite numbers were involved in the host immune response, and neuronal morphogenesis and lipid metabolic processes, respectively. These results suggest that changes in the gene expression profile associated with neuronal functions as well as immune responses can contribute to the pathogenesis in N. caninum-infected animals.
Neospora caninum is a protozoan parasite that causes neurological disorders in dogs and cattle. It can cause nonsuppurative meningoencephalitis and a variety of neuronal symptoms are observed, particularly in dogs. However, the pathogenic mechanism, including the relationship between the parasite distribution and the clinical signs, is unclear. In this study, to understand the pathogenic mechanism of neosporosis, parasite distribution and lesions were assessed in the brain of mice infected with N. caninum (strain Nc-1). Host gene expression was also analyzed with RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). The histopathological lesions in the frontal lobe and the medulla oblongata were significantly more severe in symptomatic mice than in asymptomatic mice, although no association between the severity of the lesions and parasite numbers was found. In infected mice, the expression of 772 mouse brain genes was upregulated. A GOstat analysis predicted that the upregulated genes were involved in the host immune response. Genes whose expression correlated positively and negatively with parasite numbers were involved in the host immune response, and neuronal morphogenesis and lipid metabolic processes, respectively. These results suggest that changes in the gene expression profile associated with neuronal functions as well as immune responses can contribute to the pathogenesis in N. caninum-infected animals.
Neospora caninum is an intracellular apicomplexan parasite that naturally infects dogs and cattle. The infectivity of N. caninum for humans is unknown. However, serological evidence suggests that humans are exposed to N. caninum1. Furthermore, Neospora DNA has been detected in experimentally infected rhesus macaques2. There are three infectious stages of N. caninum: tachyzoites, bradyzoites in tissue cysts, and sporozoites from oocysts. Dogs probably become infected via the ingestion of tissue containing bradyzoites and cattle via the ingestion of food or drink contaminated with oocysts. Although the proliferation of tachyzoites can occur in many organs, including the heart, lung, liver, and skin, neuromuscular disorder is the clinically most important in canine neosporosis3. In cattle, N. caninum is a major cause of abortion worldwide, and calves with congenital infections can show neurological signs45. Tissue cysts are predominantly formed in the central nervous systems (CNS), and N. caninum is thought to show tropism for the nervous system.Neospora caninum can cause fatal diseases in dogs of all ages, although most cases of clinical neosporosis are reported in puppies, which often show characteristic pelvic limb paralysis and rigid hyperextension36. In contrast, a variety of neurological signs are observed in adult dogs, and neurological symptoms are thought to depend on the site that is parasitized within CNS5. The intracellular multiplication of the tachyzoites and the subsequent cell rupture trigger the development of lesions in N. caninum-infected tissues7. However, the number of parasites is not always associated with the severity of the histopathological lesions in the brain89, and the mechanism of the neuronal pathogenesis of neosporosis is unclear.Toxoplasma gondii is closely related to N. caninum and causes abortion and neuronal disorders in humans and animals. It has also been suggested that chronic infection with T. gondii can involve behavioral changes and psychiatric disorders in humans and animals10. In a previous study, we investigated the gene expression profiles and histopathological changes in the brains of mice infected with T. gondii, and our findings indicated that T. gondii stimulated the immune response including antigen presentation and diminished signal transduction included small-GTPase-mediated signal transduction and vesicle formation, which both regulate neurological functions in the brain11. Therefore, changes in gene expression caused by N. caninuminfection potentially contribute to the neuronal pathogenesis in N. caninum-infected animals.Some strains of mice including BALB/c are susceptible to N. caninum and exhibit encephalitis caused by the parasite infection12. Therefore mice have been used widely as an infection model of neosporosis to investigate immune responses and vaccine efficacy13. In this study, to understand the mechanism of neuronal pathogenesis during subacute infection with N. caninum, we investigated the histopathological changes, the distribution of the parasite, and the gene expression profiles (using a whole-transcriptome shotgun sequencing approach, RNA-Seq) in the brains of mice infected with N. caninum.
Results
Mice infected with N. caninum showed characteristic clinical signs and histopathological changes in the brain
Pathological severity was evaluated in 17 mice, and 10 of the 17 mice showed clinical signs of neosporosis including febrile responses and leg paralysis 39 days after infection (See Figure 1A). Seven of 10 symptomatic mice showed neurological signs, including circling motion, head tilting, and leg paralysis. We analyzed the nine area of brain histopathologically and for the quantification of parasite load. Histopathological lesions, including perivascular cuff, mononuclear cellular meningitis, glial cell activation, and focal necrosis, were observed in the brains of all 17 mice, which are similar to the lesions found in dogs891415. Each focal lesion was scored for severity using a scale from 1 to 4 (See Figure 2A–D). The total pathological scores for all areas in the brain are shown in Figure 2E. The total scores for the frontal lobe and medulla oblongata were significantly higher in the symptomatic mice than in the asymptomatic mice. Although there were no significant differences between the symptomatic and asymptomatic mice in the cerebellum, two symptomatic mice showed very high scores.
Figure 1
Flow diagram illustrating the number of mice used in each analysis.
(A) For the histopathological analysis, 25 mice were infected with N. caninum. Because eight of the 25 mice died before sampling or may not have been infected, the severity of the brain lesions in nine different areas (olfactory system, frontal lobe, caudate putamen, hippocampus, hypothalamus, amygdala, periaqueductal gray, medulla oblongata and cerebellum) was estimated in 17 mice (ten symptomatic and seven asymptomatic mice). (B) For the detection of N. caninum and the RNA-Seq analysis, 14 mice were used (four uninfected and 10 infected mice). Thirty-nine days after inoculation, six of the 10 infected mice showed clinical signs of neosporosis, but four animals did not. To detect N. caninum in different areas of the brain, six infected mice were selected (four symptomatic and two asymptomatic mice). The brains of these six infected mice were divided into eight different areas (olfactory system, frontal lobe, caudate putamen, hippocampus, hypothalamus, amygdala, periaqueductal gray, and cerebellum), and used for DNA extraction and quantitative PCR analysis of the parasite. Additionally, to detect N. caninum in the medulla oblongata, DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded brain tissues containing the medulla oblongata and cerebellum (n = 17, from mice shown in Figure 1A) and subjected to quantitative PCR. For the detection of N. caninum in whole-brain samples and the RNA-Seq analysis, four uninfected and four infected (two symptomatic and two asymptomatic mice) brains were used. DNA and RNA were extracted from each brain sample and used for the quantitative PCR analysis of the parasite numbers and the RNA-Seq analysis.
Figure 2
Histopathological lesions and parasite distributions in different areas of N. caninum-infected mouse brains.
(A–D) Histopathological lesions in mouse brains infected with N. caninum (n = 17). To estimate the severity of the histopathological lesions, the lesions were scored as follows: (A) localized perivascular cuff (score 1), (B) local gliosis (score 2), (C) focal necrosis with moderate inflammatory cell infiltration (score 3), and (D) severe glial cell and macrophage infiltration, and rarefaction of the neuropil in extensive necrotic foci (score 4). (E) The total pathological scores for different mouse brain areas were determined as described in the Materials and Methods (ten symptomatic and seven asymptomatic mice). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 (unpaired Student's t-test). (F) After DNA extraction from N. caninum-infected mouse brain samples (four symptomatic and two asymptomatic mice) and paraffin-embedded brain tissues, including the medulla oblongata and cerebellum (ten symptomatic and seven asymptomatic mice), parasite numbers were quantified by real-time PCR using primers specific for the N. caninum Nc5 gene.
Tachyzoites were found within some lesions, but no tissue cysts were found in the present study. Therefore, the tropism of tissue cysts was not determined histopathologically. We also investigated the distribution of the parasite in the brain with real-time PCR. The numbers of parasites for each area of the brain are shown in Figure 2F. A sporadically high parasite load was detected in the frontal lobe and periaqueductal gray of the symptomatic mice. However we could not evaluate the difference of parasite number among the areas statistically because of small sample number. No association between the parasite load and the severity of the lesions was found. In an immunohistochemical analysis, the infiltration of macrophages or microglia and the production of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) were predominantly observed in the necrotic and inflammatory lesions (See Figure 3).
Figure 3
Immunohistochemical analysis of macrophages/microglia and iNOS in lesions of N. caninum-infected mouse brain.
(A–C) Serial sections of N. caninum-infected mouse brain. (A and A′) HE staining. (A′) A high-magnification image showing focal necrosis with mononuclear cell infiltration and cuffing. (B and B′) Immunohistochemical analysis with anti-Iba1 antibody. Infiltration of activated macrophages/microglia was observed around the necrotic area. (C and C′) Immunohistochemical analysis with an anti-iNOS antibody. Expression of iNOS was detected in inflammatory cells around the necrotic areas.
Gene expression profiles are altered in their brains of mice infected with N. caninum
Eight mice, consisting of four N. caninum-infected mice and four uninfected mice, were used in the transcriptome analysis (See Figure 1B). Two of the four N. caninum-infected mice showed clinical signs of neosporosis, including starry coat and hunched back, 39 days after infection. The numbers of parasites tended to be slightly higher in the symptomatic mice (See supplementary Table S1). RNA obtained from the eight mice was subjected to high-throughput sequencing on an Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx. Eight libraries were sequenced and 34–47 million raw sequence reads were obtained per sample. Of these, 63.5%–84.9% could be mapped to the mouse genome (See supplementary Table S2).To identify the differentially expressed genes in the experimental groups, we analyzed the transcriptome data from the N. caninum-infected and uninfected mouse brains with DESeq. The magnitude distribution of the significantly altered genes was illustrated with an MA plot analysis (See supplementary Figure S1). We analyzed 37,306 genes including 22,661 protein-coding genes. The expression of 772 protein-coding genes (2.1% of all analyzed genes and 3.4% of protein-coding genes) in the brains of the mice infected with N. caninum was significantly upregulated relative to their expression in the uninfected mice. The 30 most upregulated genes after infection with N. caninum are listed in Table 1. These 30 genes included genes for chemokines and chemokine receptors (Cxcl9, Ccl8, Ccl5, Cxcl10, and Cxcr6), immunoglobulins (Ighg2c, Iglc2, and Igj), interferon (IFN)-inducible GTPase family members (Tgtp2, Gbp8, and Iigp1), and MHC class II antigens (Cd74, H2-Eb1, H2-Aa, and H2-Q7). The quantitative PCR analysis showed that expression of Ccl8, Ccl5, Cxcl10, Cxcr6, Tgtp2, Gbp8, Iigp1 and Saa3 were significantly upregulated in the brains of N. caninum-infected mice (See Figure 4). In contrast, only three genes (Fcrls, Myoc, and Gkn3) were significantly downregulated in the infected mice (See supplementary Table S3). When the functional annotations of the genes upregulated by N. caninuminfection were analyzed using GOstat, gene ontology (GO) terms associated with immune system processes, immune responses, and cell activation were represented significantly more strongly in the upregulated genes compared with the reference genes (See Table 2).
Table 1
Thirty genes most significantly upregulated in N. caninum-infected mouse brains
Gene symbol
Description
Average of FPMK
Fold change
FDR
Uninfected (n = 4)
Infected (n = 4)
Saa3
serum amyloid A 3
0.12
258.01
1989.26
3.33E-05
Cxcl9
chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9
0.01
19.27
1581.14
1.83E-07
Ighg2c
immunoglobulin heavy constant gamma 2C
0.34
401.45
1196.80
1.53E-12
Ccl8
chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 8
0.08
88.64
1065.20
3.29E-04
Cd8a
CD8 antigen, alpha chain
0.00
3.03
1029.22
6.60E-08
F10
coagulation factor X
0.01
5.48
952.87
4.34E-06
F830016B08Rik
RIKEN cDNA F830016B08 gene
0.00
2.52
917.74
1.30E-11
Iglc2
immunoglobulin lambda constant 2
0.02
14.02
694.68
3.94E-07
Ccl5
chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 5
0.38
231.64
611.07
3.11E-05
Il1rn
interleukin 1 receptor antagonist
0.02
2.55
535.78
1.83E-06
Tgtp2
T cell specific GTPase 2
0.10
13.67
533.21
1.08E-11
Lcn2
lipocalin 2
0.09
41.88
512.67
1.22E-09
Nkg7
natural killer cell group 7 sequence
0.01
6.24
494.87
3.94E-07
Cd74
CD74 antigen (invariant polypeptide of major histocompatibility complex, class II antigen-associated)
2.57
1281.31
484.61
6.26E-10
Gm4951
predicted gene 4951
0.81
355.49
484.61
7.30E-10
H2-Eb1
histocompatibility 2, class II antigen E beta
0.77
217.08
461.83
5.20E-09
Igj
immunoglobulin joining chain
0.03
11.31
450.15
7.14E-06
Gbp8
guanylate-binding protein 8
0.05
20.43
389.61
2.04E-05
Cst7
cystatin F (leukocystatin)
0.17
43.87
387.41
1.78E-04
Cxcl10
chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10
1.60
530.34
378.75
1.51E-06
H2-Aa
histocompatibility 2, class II antigen A, alpha
0.17
57.55
351.69
2.33E-10
Iigp1
interferon inducible GTPase 1
0.06
29.46
339.64
1.25E-08
Zbp1
Z-DNA binding protein 1
0.01
1.94
334.68
2.61E-09
Klrk1
killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily K, member 1
0.05
15.91
329.33
9.59E-05
H2-Q7
histocompatibility 2, Q region locus 7
0.01
2.32
324.26
5.60E-12
Gimap7
GTPase, IMAP family member 7
0.02
6.33
305.31
2.17E-04
Apoc2
apolipoprotein C-II
0.01
2.63
303.69
1.64E-07
Cxcr6
chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 6
0.10
22.60
295.81
1.30E-05
Fcgr4
Fc receptor, IgG, low affinity IV
0.01
3.15
265.63
1.11E-04
Irg1
immunoresponsive gene 1
0.81
355.49
241.83
1.57E-05
(>two-fold change and FDR < 0.05)
Figure 4
Gene expression analysis by quantitative PCR using RNA from the brain samples used in RNA-seq analysis.
(A) Expression of the genes (Saa3, Cxcl9, Ccl8, Ccl5, Cxcl10, Cxcr6, Tgtp2, Gbp8 and Ligp1) that upregulated by N. caminum infection. (B) Expression of the genes (Slc6a4, Slc6a5, Tph2 and Ldlr) that downregulated in symptomatic mice infected with N. caninum. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.
Table 2
GO terms for the most significantly upregulated genes in mouse brains after infection with N. caninum
Accession
GO term
Reference genes
Up-regulated genes
FDR
# Genes
%
# Genes
%
GO:0002376
immune system process
566
3.8
184
28.4
0
GO:0006952
defense response
353
2.4
104
16.0
0
GO:0006955
immune response
346
2.3
138
21.3
0
GO:0006954
inflammatory response
178
1.2
64
9.9
5.92E-64
GO:0009897
external side of plasma membrane
121
0.8
51
7.9
6.28E-59
GO:0009986
cell surface
168
1.1
58
8.9
2.06E-55
GO:0045321
leukocyte activation
189
1.3
60
9.2
1.41E-52
GO:0001775
cell activation
202
1.4
62
9.6
1.64E-52
GO:0009611
response to wounding
252
1.7
69
10.6
1.10E-51
GO:0002682
regulation of immune system process
92
0.6
41
6.3
1.50E-49
GO:0050776
regulation of immune response
90
0.6
40
6.2
3.46E-48
GO:0051239
regulation of multicellular organismal process
250
1.7
65
10.0
1.01E-45
GO:0009605
response to external stimulus
393
2.6
83
12.8
1.57E-45
GO:0046649
lymphocyte activation
173
1.2
53
8.2
1.36E-44
GO:0042110
T cell activation
112
0.7
39
6.0
5.58E-37
GO:0002252
immune effector process
113
0.8
38
5.9
1.10E-34
GO:0051240
positive regulation of multicellular organismal process
96
0.6
34
5.2
1.51E-32
GO:0001816
cytokine production
95
0.6
33
5.1
6.63E-31
GO:0002520
immune system development
228
1.5
49
7.6
1.39E-26
GO:0006935
chemotaxis
92
0.6
30
4.6
4.22E-26
GO:0042330
taxis
92
0.6
30
4.6
4.22E-26
GO:0048534
hemopoietic or lymphoid organ development
212
1.4
45
6.9
6.89E-24
GO:0019882
antigen processing and presentation
43
0.3
33
5.1
2.91E-23
GO:0006950
response to stress
666
4.5
87
13.4
2.07E-22
GO:0030097
hemopoiesis
190
1.3
40
6.2
8.01E-21
GO:0005886
plasma membrane
1476
9.9
143
22.0
1.76E-20
GO:0051249
regulation of lymphocyte activation
76
0.5
36
5.5
3.31E-20
GO:0050865
regulation of cell activation
79
0.5
36
5.5
8.86E-20
GO:0048002
antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen
28
0.2
26
4.0
1.33E-19
GO:0002521
leukocyte differentiation
118
0.8
30
4.6
1.33E-19
Gene expression levels correlate with the numbers of parasites in the brain
To investigate whether the fragments/kb of transcripts/million fragments mapped (FPKM) value correlates with the number of parasites in the infected mouse brain, the correlation coefficients were calculated. Seven hundred and twenty-two genes correlated positively with the numbers of parasites measured, whereas 320 genes showed negative correlations. There were 253 genes overlapping between genes upregulated by infection and genes correlated positively with the number of parasites (See supplementary Table S4). Ten (Cd8a, F10, F830016B08Rik, Il1rn, Lcn2, Cxcl10, Kirk1, Gimap7, Cxcr6 and Irg1) of the 30 genes most upregulated in N. caninum infected mice were not overlapped with the genes correlated positively with the number of parasites. Table 3 and Table 4 show the thirty most overrepresented GO terms for the genes that correlated positively and negatively with the parasites load, respectively. The GOstat analysis showed that the genes whose expression correlated positively with parasite numbers were associated with lysosome and ribosome in addition to immune responses. In contrast, the statistically overrepresented GO terms for the genes whose expression correlated negatively with parasite numbers involved cell and neuron projection, sterol and steroid metabolic processes, and synaptic transmission. These results indicate that N. caninum stimulates translational activation and intracellular digestion and reduce cell morphogenesis, including that of axons and dendrites, lipid metabolism, and neural transmission.
Table 3
Thirty most overrepresented GO terms for the genes that correlated positively with the parasites load
Accession
GO term
Reference gene
Genes positively correlated with parasite number
FDR
# Genes
%
# Genes
%
GO:0002376
immune system process
566
3.8
93
15.0
1.29E-37
GO:0006955
immune response
346
2.3
65
10.5
3.06E-31
GO:0000323
lytic vacuole
153
1.0
40
6.5
8.65E-29
GO:0005764
lysosome
153
1.0
40
6.5
8.65E-29
GO:0005773
vacuole
173
1.2
41
6.6
3.18E-26
GO:0019882
antigen processing and presentation
43
0.3
28
4.5
4.23E-18
GO:0048002
antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen
28
0.2
23
3.7
3.31E-16
GO:0006952
defense response
353
2.4
51
8.2
6.81E-16
GO:0044444
cytoplasmic part
2791
18.7
196
31.7
1.28E-12
GO:0005737
cytoplasm
4861
32.5
295
47.7
5.58E-12
GO:0019884
antigen processing and presentation of exogenous antigen
22
0.1
16
2.6
2.34E-10
GO:0002478
antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptide antigen
17
0.1
14
2.3
1.89E-09
GO:0042611
MHC protein complex
19
0.1
14
2.3
4.69E-09
GO:0006412
translation
385
2.6
44
7.1
1.60E-08
GO:0002474
antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen via MHC class I
14
0.1
12
1.9
3.47E-08
GO:0019886
antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptide antigen via MHC class II
15
0.1
12
1.9
4.97E-08
GO:0002495
antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen via MHC class II
15
0.1
12
1.9
4.97E-08
GO:0003735
structural constituent of ribosome
143
1.0
23
3.7
7.41E-08
GO:0002504
antigen processing and presentation of peptide or polysaccharide antigen via MHC class II
16
0.1
12
1.9
7.57E-08
GO:0002252
immune effector process
113
0.8
20
3.2
7.57E-08
GO:0006954
inflammatory response
178
1.2
26
4.2
1.05E-07
GO:0005840
ribosome
148
1.0
23
3.7
1.83E-07
GO:0030529
ribonucleoprotein complex
350
2.3
39
6.3
3.78E-07
GO:0009897
external side of plasma membrane
121
0.8
20
3.2
4.47E-07
GO:0016064
immunoglobulin mediated immune response
55
0.4
17
2.7
5.25E-07
GO:0019724
B cell mediated immunity
56
0.4
17
2.7
6.41E-07
GO:0005829
cytosol
316
2.1
36
5.8
6.81E-07
GO:0009611
response to wounding
252
1.7
31
5.0
7.65E-07
GO:0002449
lymphocyte mediated immunity
75
0.5
19
3.1
8.81E-07
GO:0002443
leukocyte mediated immunity
81
0.5
19
3.1
2.52E-06
(FDR < 0.05)
Table 4
Thirty most overrepresented GO terms for the genes that correlated negatively with the parasites load
Accession
GO term
Reference gene
Genes negatively correlated with parasite number
FDR
# Genes
%
# Genes
%
GO:0042995
cell projection
333
2.2
23
8.9
6.75E-08
GO:0043005
neuron projection
108
0.7
16
6.2
1.27E-06
GO:0005886
plasma membrane
1476
9.9
56
21.7
2.07E-06
GO:0051179
localization
2430
16.3
78
30.2
7.01E-06
GO:0016192
vesicle-mediated transport
375
2.5
21
8.1
9.05E-05
GO:0006810
transport
2099
14.1
65
25.2
6.52E-04
GO:0016125
sterol metabolic process
67
0.4
10
3.9
6.52E-04
GO:0051234
establishment of localization
2152
14.4
66
25.6
6.52E-04
GO:0008202
steroid metabolic process
130
0.9
13
5.0
6.52E-04
GO:0048667
neuron morphogenesis during differentiation
153
1.0
14
5.4
6.52E-04
GO:0048812
neurite morphogenesis
153
1.0
14
5.4
6.52E-04
GO:0016126
sterol biosynthetic process
26
0.2
7
2.7
6.52E-04
GO:0050808
synapse organization and biogenesis
39
0.3
8
3.1
6.52E-04
GO:0007268
synaptic transmission
179
1.2
15
5.8
6.52E-04
GO:0000267
cell fraction
422
2.8
21
8.1
6.80E-04
GO:0019226
transmission of nerve impulse
211
1.4
16
6.2
8.53E-04
GO:0030424
axon
58
0.4
9
3.5
8.72E-04
GO:0016020
membrane
6123
41.0
144
55.8
9.91E-04
GO:0008324
cation transmembrane transporter activity
435
2.9
21
8.1
1.08E-03
GO:0008203
cholesterol metabolic process
61
0.4
9
3.5
1.08E-03
GO:0007409
axonogenesis
146
1.0
13
5.0
1.10E-03
GO:0006836
neurotransmitter transport
46
0.3
8
3.1
1.10E-03
GO:0000904
cellular morphogenesis during differentiation
172
1.2
14
5.4
1.10E-03
GO:0030030
cell projection organization and biogenesis
252
1.7
17
6.6
1.10E-03
GO:0048858
cell projection morphogeneisis
252
1.7
17
6.6
1.10E-03
GO:0032990
cell part morphogenesis
252
1.7
17
6.6
1.10E-03
GO:0006695
cholesterol biosynthetic process
20
0.1
6
2.3
1.16E-03
GO:0031175
neurite development
183
1.2
14
5.4
1.99E-03
GO:0048699
generation of neuron
299
2.0
16
6.2
2.12E-03
GO:0015075
ion transmembrane transporter activity
595
4.0
25
9.7
2.46E-03
(FDR < 0.05)
Gene expression profiles of symptomatic mice differed from those of asymptomatic animals
The severity of the clinical signs of neosporosis differed among the N. caninum-infected mice (See supplementary Table S1). To identify differences in the gene expression profiles associated with the development of neosporosis, the genes expressed differentially between symptomatic and asymptomatic mice were analyzed with DESeq. The expression of no gene was higher in the symptomatic mice than in the asymptomatic mice, but the expression of eight genes was lower in the symptomatic mice than in the asymptomatic mice (See Table 5). These genes encoded solute carrier family 6 (a neurotransmitter transporter, serotonin), member 4 (SLC6A4), solute carrier family 6 (a neurotransmitter transporter, glycine), member 5 (SLC6A5), tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH2), and low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR). Although we could not evaluate the difference of gene expression between symptomatic and asymptomatic mice statistically because of small sample number, Slc6a4, slc6a5, Tph2 and ldlr tended to be downredulated in symptomatic mice in quantitative PCR analysis (See Figure 4).
Table 5
Genes significantly altered in brain samples from mice exhibiting clinical signs of neosporosis
Gene symbol
Description
Average of FPMK
FPKM Fold change
FDR
No signs (n = 2)
Clinical signs (n = 2)
Hoxb5
homeobox B5
1.09
0.09
0.08
7.33.E-04
Slc6a4
solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, serotonin), member 4
2.94
0.38
0.13
3.04.E-09
BC037034
cDNA sequence BC037034
10.04
1.44
0.14
9.05.E-03
Tph2
tryptophan hydroxylase 2
4.03
0.88
0.22
6.85.E-06
Slc6a5
solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, glycine), member 5
4.15
0.95
0.23
3.84.E-06
Mab21l2
mab-21-like 2 (C. elegans)
3.26
1.08
0.33
2.41.E-02
Fos
FBJ osteosarcoma oncogene
33.97
12.06
0.36
5.30.E-03
Ldlr
low density lipoprotein receptor
7.42
2.89
0.39
9.05.E-03
(>two-fold change and FDR < 0.05)
Discussion
The BALB/c mouse is known to be susceptible to the development of encephalitis induced by N. caninum and encephalitis is observed several weeks after inoculation1216. In a previous study of T. gondii-infected mouse brains, we showed that the frontal lobe was more affected than any other area of the brain, whereas tissue damage and parasite infection were minor in the cerebellum11. The frontal lobe and medulla oblongata were mainly affected in symptomatic mice infected with N. caninum and some mice showed severe histopathological lesions in the cerebellum. Therefore, lesion formation in the medulla oblongata and the cerebellum may be characteristic of N. caninuminfection. These results suggest that damage to neuronal tissues in the frontal lobe, medulla oblongata, and cerebellum is associated with the pathogenesis of neosporosis. Some infectious diseases including listeriosis show brain stem tropism17. Listeria monocytogens, which is enable to survive and multiply in macrophages, invades in the brain by centripetal migration along cranial nerve17 and interaction between infected myeloid cell and endothelium18. T. gondii and N. caninum are thought to be delivered to organs by infected leukocytes in the blood. Although no association between the severity of the lesions and parasite numbers was found, endothelium in brain stem may be prone to adhere to pathogen-infected leukocyte and obstruction by leukocyte adhesion may lead to the damage of parenchyma of brain. Expression of adhesion molecule in each area of brain is intriguing. In some adult cases of canine neosporosis, the cerebellum and brainstem are predominantly affected81415. Those cases suggest that the cerebellum can be the most commonly affected region in adult dogs with neosporosis14. Therefore, the murine model of neosporosis could be help clarifying the pathology in adult dogs.In this study, no association between the parasite load and the severity of the lesions in each area was found. In canine neosporosis, a disassociation between parasite density and the severity of tissue damage has also been reported in adult cases89. Therefore, host factors, which can cause or exacerbate tissue damage, may be involved in the pathogenesis of neosporosis. In the brains of N. caninum infected mice, infiltration of macrophages or microglia and the production of iNOS were observed in the lesions. Activated microglia and astrocyte produce neurotoxic factors including nitric oxide (NO). NO produced by activated microglia and astrocytes inhibits neuronal respiration and causes glutamate release from neurons, which results in neuronal death from glutamate excitotoxicity via the N-methyl d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor1920. Therefore, NO may be a factor that exacerbates brain tissue damage in neosporosis.The 30 genes most strongly upregulated by N. caninuminfection were similar to those upregulated in T. gondii-infected mice11. IFN-inducible GTPases play an important role in the host defense against intracellular pathogens, including T. gondii21. IIGP1 (IRGA6: immunity–related GTPase family member a6) is a member of the p47 GTPase family, and the accumulation of IIGP1 on the parasitophorous vacuole membrane of T. gondii resulted in the disruption of the membrane2223 and the necrotic death of the infected cell23. We showed that Iigp1 was significantly upregulated in the brain of T. gondii infected mice in previous study11. ROP18 is a rhoptry kinase expressed highly by virulent T. gondii and phosphorylates and inactivates immunity-related GTPase (IRGs). However, genome sequencing and transcriptome analysis of N. caninum Liverpool strain revealed that ROP18 in N. caninu is a pseudogene and N. caninum is unable to prevent the host from using IRGs to disrupt the parasitophorous vacuole24. This suggests that the growth of N. caninum could be inhibited effectively, which can lead to low parasite number in the lesions. A previous study showed that CXCL9/MIG, CXCL10/IP-10, and CCL5/RANTES are induced, dependent on IFN-γ, in the brains of BALB/c mice during chronic infection with T. gondii25. Protective immunity against N. caninum involves the Th1-type immune response, including IFN-γ and interleukin 12 (IL-12) production1626, and CCL5 induces the migration of Th1 cells via chemokine receptors including CCR527. On the other hand, some studies have indicated that chemokines and their receptors are involved in exacerbating neuronal damage. Ischemic brain injury was exacerbated by a systemic increase in CCL5 during a Th1-polarized response induced by infection28 and the downregulation of CCR5 protected the brain from neuron loss, inflammation, and seizure activity29. Therefore, the chemokines upregulated by N. caninuminfection may be involved in both protective immunity and neuronal pathogenesis. Saa3 expression was also highly upregulated in the mouse brain after N. caninuminfection. Serum amyloid A (SAA) is an acute-phase protein, and a previous study suggested that SAA3 activates Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4 as an endogenous ligand in astrocytes infected with herpes simplex virus type 130. SAA3 is also produced in Schwann cells and macrophages in injured peripheral nerves31. Thus, SAA3 may act as a cytokine and be involved in the immune response and neuronal degeneration.Only three genes (Fcrls, Myoc, and Gkn3) were significantly downregulated in the infected mice. Myoc is related to myelination in the peripheral nerve32 and Fcrls was previously known as macrophage scavenger receptor 2 (Msr2) and is upregulated by mild traumatic brain injury33, and downregulated in brain infected T. gondii11 and Japanese encephalitis virus34. Although function of Fcrls is not well known in brain, downregulation of Fcrls is thought to be associated with host-pathogen interaction.The GOstat analysis showed that the genes whose expression correlated negatively with parasite numbers involved cell and neuron projection, sterol and steroid metabolic processes, and synaptic transmission. Cholesterol is a component of cell membranes, and neurons and astrocytes demand high levels of cholesterol because they have the enormous membrane surfaces, encompassing their axons, dendrites, synapses, and processes35. Cholesterol is also required for cell regeneration after CNS injury and for the formation of new synapses. Cholesterol levels can also affect the biophysical function of membranes, and changes in cholesterol levels of membrane have been shown to affect the excitability of rat hippocampal neurons36. Therefore, changes in the expression of genes that are involved in cellular morphogenesis and lipid metabolism, including cholesterol, may be involved in the exacerbation of neuronal damage, impaired regeneration of damaged neuronal tissues, and the disruption of neurotransmission in mouse brains infected with N. caninum.The expression of eight genes including Hoxb5, Slc6a4, Slc6a5, Tph2 and Ldlr was lower in the symptomatic mice than in the asymptomatic mice. Hoxb5 is a gene of gene family cording for transcription factors and Hoxb5 protein is expressed in mice lung during development37. A previous study demonstrated that mice deficient in glycine transporter 2 encoded by Slc6a5 showed neuromotor abnormalities, such as spasticity, hind feet clasping, and tremor38. Tryptophan hydroxylase 2 encoded by Tph2 is the key enzyme in brain serotonin synthesis39, and it is possible that serotonergic neurons work poorly in mice that develop neosporosis. Therefore, the reduced expression of genes for neurotransmitter transporters may contribute to the development of neosporosis by modulating serotonergic and glycinergic neurotransmission.In this study, we demonstrated that the frontal lobe and medulla oblongata were most often affected in N. caninum-infected mice with clinical signs and that there was no association between the parasite load and the severity of the histopathological lesions. Changes in the gene expression profile were also observed in the mouse brains after N. caninuminfection. Genes associated with the immune response, encoding chemokines and IFN-inducible GTPase family members, were upregulated in the brains of mice infected with N. caninum. In contrast, the expression of genes associated with the morphogenesis of neurons, including their synapses and projections, with lipid metabolism, and with neuronal transmission correlated negatively with the number of parasites. These results suggest that neuronal tissue damage is caused by the inflammatory responses to parasite infection and can be exacerbated by the impairment of the regeneration of damaged neuronal tissue. Our results also suggest that neuronal transmission is affected by N. caninuminfection at the level of gene transcription, and that neurological symptoms can be induced not only by organic damage but also by neuronal dysfunction.
Methods
Ethics Statement
This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (Permit number 25–59, 25–60, 25–62). All surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.
Mice
Mice used in this study were treated and used according to the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Research Animals published by the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine. Female BALB/c mice were obtained from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan). The mice were housed under specific-pathogen-free conditions in the animal facility of the National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases at the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Japan, before they were used in the experiments at 8 weeks of age.
Preparation of N. caninum tachyzoites and parasite infection of mice
Neospora caninum tachyzoites of strain Nc-140 were propagated in monkey kidney adherent fibroblasts (Vero cells) cultured in Eagle's minimum essential medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 8% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. For the purification of the tachyzoites, the parasites and host-cell debris were washed in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the final pellet was resuspended in cold PBS and passed through a 27-gauge needle and a 5.0-μm pore filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Eight-week-old mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with N. caninum parasites purified from an in vitro culture. All the mice were checked regularly for clinical signs of N. caninuminfection, such as febrile responses (e.g., a starry stiff coat), hunched back, and limb paralysis.
Brain sampling
For the histopathological analysis, 25 mice were infected with 1 × 106
N. caninum. Because six mice died or were euthanized before the scheduled date as a result of emaciation, 19 mice were sampled. Thirty-nine days after inoculation, at which time histopathological changes have occurred, the experimental mice were killed and their brains rapidly removed (See Figure 1). The brains were fixed with a 10% neutral-buffered formalin solution for 6 days. We used these brains in the histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses. Two of 19 mice showed no clinical symptoms and no pathological changes. Because it was possible that the parasite had not infected these two mice, the distribution and severity of the brain lesions were estimated in the remaining 17 of 19 mice. Of the 17 mice, 10 mice showed clinical signs of neosporosis 39 days after infection (See Figure 1).Fourteen mice (four uninfected mice and 10 infected mice) were used for the detection of N. caninum and the RNA-Seq analysis (See Figure 1). Thirty-nine days after infection, six infected mice showed the clinical signs of neosporosis and four animals did not. To detect N. caninum in different areas of the brain, six infected mice were selected (four symptomatic and two asymptomatic mice). The brains of these six infected mice were divided into eight different areas, the olfactory system, frontal lobe, caudate putamen, hippocampus, hypothalamus, amygdala, periaqueductal gray, and cerebellum. The samples to be used for DNA extraction and quantitative PCR of the parasites were stored at −20°C until analysis.We used the other eight mice (four uninfected and four infected mice) to detect N. caninum in whole brain samples and in the RNA-Seq analysis. Of the four infected mice, two were symptomatic and two were asymptomatic. The brains of four infected mice and four uninfected mice were individually homogenized in 1 mL of TRI Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan). Each brain sample was then divided for DNA extraction (for quantitative PCR of the parasite numbers) or RNA extraction (for the RNA-Seq analysis).
Pathological analysis
After fixation, the brain samples were cut coronally, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned to 4 μm, and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). To estimate the severity of the histopathological lesions, they were scored with the following scheme: 0, no lesion; 1, minimal lesions limited to localized perivascular cuffs or slight mononuclear cell infiltration in the meninges; 2, mild lesions, including perivascular cuffs, meningitis, and local glial cell infiltration; 3, moderate lesions, including perivascular cuff, meningitis, glial cell activation, focal necrosis, and rarefaction of the neuropil, with occasional macrophage infiltration; 4, severe lesions, including perivascular cuffs, meningitis, glial cell activation, rarefaction of the neuropil, and extensive necrosis. The severity of the brain lesions was estimated in nine different areas including olfactory system, frontal lobe, caudate putamen, hippocampus, hypothalamus, amygdala, periaqueductal gray, medulla oblongata and cerebellum. The scores for each lesion were added for each area, and the total pathological score for each area was used in the data analysis. Pathological lesions representing the different scores are shown in Figure 2A–D. Statistical significance of the differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic mice was investigated by t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Immunohistochemical analysis of macrophages/microglia and iNOS
Immunohistochemistry was performed with antibodies directed against ionizedcalcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1; Wako, Tokyo, Japan; diluted 1:2000) or inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; diluted 1:200) as the primary antibody and a secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish-peroxidase-labeled polymer (EnVision+ kit, DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark). To immunostain for Iba1 and iNOS, deparaffinized sections were subjected to heat treatment in Tris–EDTA buffer (pH 9) and 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6), respectively. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation with 3% H2O2 for 5 min at room temperature. The tissue sections were then incubated in goat serum for 30 min at room temperature to prevent nonspecific reactions. The sections were exposed to each primary antibody at 4°C overnight and then incubated with the secondary antibody for 40 min at 37°C. The signals were detected with diaminobenzidine (ImmPACT DAB®, Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA), followed by counterstaining with Mayer's hematoxylin.
DNA extraction and quantitative PCR for the detection of N. caninum DNA
To prepare DNA, the brain of each N. caninum-infected mouse was thawed in 10 times its volume of DNA extraction buffer (0.1 M Tris–HCl [pH 9.0], 1% SDS, 0.1 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) with 100 μg/mL proteinase K at 55°C. DNA was extracted with a commercial kit (DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with a standard protocol recommended by the manufacturer. In addition to eight areas of brain (olfactory system, frontal lobe, caudate putamen, hippocampus, hypothalamus, amygdala, periaqueductal gray, and cerebellum), we estimate the parasite load in medulla oblongata because relatively severe histopathological changes were observed in the area. To evaluate the parasite load in the medulla oblongata, we used the DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue sections from the 17 mice used for the pathological analysis. The sections contained the medulla oblongata and cerebellum because we could not remove the cerebellum from the samples. DNA was extracted from the paraffin-embedded tissues with a commercial kit (QIAamp® DNA FFPE Tissue Kit; Qiagen). The parasite DNA was amplified as described previously41. Briefly, we used the SYBR Green PCR Core Kit (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and primers complementary to the Nc5 gene of N. caninum: the forward primer spanning nucleotides 248–257 (5′-ACT GGA GGC ACG CTG AAC AC-3′) and the reverse primer spanning nucleotides 303–323 (5′-AAC AAT GCT TCG CAA GAG GAA-3′). Amplification, data acquisition, and data analysis were carried out in the ABI Prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems), and the calculated cycle threshold values (Ct) were exported to Microsoft Excel for analysis as described previously11. The limit of detection was 0.1 parasites in 50 ng of tissue DNA.
Transcriptome sequencing
Transcriptome sequencing was conducted as described previously11. Briefly, samples obtained from eight mice underwent poly-A selection with 1 μg of total RNA. Sequencing libraries were constructed with the RNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA); 36-bp single-end sequencing was performed using the Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx (Illumina) with the TruSeq SBS Kit v5-GA (36 cycle) (Illumina), according to the manufacturer's instructions. All treatment and following analyses associated with transcriptome sequencing were done individually.
Aligning sequence tags to the mouse genome and RefSeq
Aligning sequence tags was conducted as described previously11. Briefly, the raw sequence reads were mapped to the mouse genome (mm10) using TopHat (ver. 1.3.3 doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120) allowing two mismatches and gtf data (Mus_musculus.GRCm38.69). The normalized transcription profiles were estimated based on the mapping results using cufflinks (doi:10.1038/nbt.1621). The number of fragments/kb of transcript/million fragments mapped (FPKM) was converted from the raw read counts for each transcript. The MGI ID and gene ontology (GO) were obtained from the Mouse Genome Informatics database42, and then integrated into the estimated expression profiles, together with the gene biotypes extracted from the gtf data.
Identification of differentially expressed genes
Aligning sequence tags was conducted as described previously11. Briefly, differentially expressed genes were identified with the DESeq package in the R software43, using a two-fold change (log2 fold-change >1 or <−1) and a 5% false discovery rate (FDR) cut-off for the thresholds. The expression intensity values were analyzed with an MA plot-based method after data normalization and the calculation of FDR.
Gene ontology (GO) analysis
The function of individual genes can be analyzed with GOstat (http://gostat.wehi.edu.au/), as described previously11. Using GOstat, we identified GO terms statistically overrepresented in the selected genes compared with the reference genes (all genes; 14938 genes). The statistical analysis was performed with a Benjamini correction, which controls FDR44. FDRs < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Correlation between gene expression levels and parasite numbers
The correlation coefficients for the FPKM values and the numbers of parasites in the mouse brain were calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient, as previously described11. The range of correlation coefficients for positive correlations was 0.7 to 1.0, and the no-correlation range was −0.7 to 0.7, whereas the range for negative correlation was −0.7 to −1. We analyzed genes that correlated positively or negatively with the number of parasites in the mouse brain using GOstat.
Quantitative reverse-transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR)
Steady state mRNA expressions of the genes that upregulated by N. caninuminfection and downregulated in symptomatic mice infected with the parasites were measured by qRT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted using TRI Reagent (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA), from the left halves of brains. Reverse transcription was performed using Superscript III™ Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instruction. Real-time PCR was performed using an Applied Biosystems Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System with SYBR Green master mix (AB Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The fold change Ct method was used, where Ct is the threshold concentration (User Bulletin no. 2; Perkin-Elmer, Boston, MA, USA). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA was used as a control. Specific primer sequences were shown in Table S5.
Author Contributions
Y.N. designed research. M.N., S.T., F.I. and Y.M. performed experiments. M.N. and H.F. analyzed tissues histopathologically and with immunohistochemistry. S.T., J.Y. and Y.S. conducted transcriptome analysis. Y.N., M.N. and S.T. discussed results and drafted the manuscript. All authors have primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Authors: Heung Sun Kwon; Thomas V Johnson; Myung Kuk Joe; Mones Abu-Asab; Jun Zhang; Chi Chao Chan; Stanislav I Tomarev Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Janan T Eppig; Judith A Blake; Carol J Bult; James A Kadin; Joel E Richardson Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Adam James Reid; Sarah J Vermont; James A Cotton; David Harris; Grant A Hill-Cawthorne; Stephanie Könen-Waisman; Sophia M Latham; Tobias Mourier; Rebecca Norton; Michael A Quail; Mandy Sanders; Dhanasekaran Shanmugam; Amandeep Sohal; James D Wasmuth; Brian Brunk; Michael E Grigg; Jonathan C Howard; John Parkinson; David S Roos; Alexander J Trees; Matthew Berriman; Arnab Pain; Jonathan M Wastling Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Beatriz Navarro-Domínguez; María Martín-Peciña; Francisco J Ruiz-Ruano; Josefa Cabrero; José María Corral; María Dolores López-León; Timothy F Sharbel; Juan Pedro M Camacho Journal: Chromosoma Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 4.316
Authors: Luzia Teixeira; Raquel M Marques; Pedro Ferreirinha; Filipa Bezerra; Joana Melo; João Moreira; Ana Pinto; Alexandra Correia; Paula G Ferreira; Manuel Vilanova Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Aruna Shrestha; Ahmed Abd-Elfattah; Barbara Freudenschuss; Barbara Hinney; Nicola Palmieri; Bärbel Ruttkowski; Anja Joachim Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2015-11-30
Authors: Patrick Waindok; Elisabeth Janecek-Erfurth; Dimitri L Lindenwald; Esther Wilk; Klaus Schughart; Robert Geffers; Christina Strube Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2022-01-14