Literature DB >> 25604808

The diagnostic pathway in complex paediatric neurology: a cost analysis.

K J M van Nimwegen1, J H Schieving2, M A A P Willemsen3, J A Veltman4, S van der Burg5, G J van der Wilt6, J P C Grutters7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic trajectory of complex paediatric neurology may be long, burdensome, and expensive while its diagnostic yield is frequently modest. Improvement in this trajectory is desirable and might be achieved by innovations such as whole exome sequencing. In order to explore the consequences of implementing them, it is important to map the current pathway. To that end, this study assessed the healthcare resource use and associated costs in this diagnostic trajectory in the Netherlands.
METHODS: Fifty patients presenting with complex paediatric neurological disorders of a suspected genetic origin were included between September 2011 and March 2012. Data on their healthcare resource utilization were collected from the hospital medical charts. Unit prices were obtained from the Dutch Healthcare Authority, the Dutch Healthcare Insurance Board, and the financial administration of the hospital. Bootstrap simulations were performed to determine mean quantities and costs.
RESULTS: The mean duration of the diagnostic trajectory was 40 months. A diagnosis was established in 6% of the patients. On average, patients made 16 physician visits, underwent four imaging and two neurophysiologic tests, and had eight genetic and 16 other tests. Mean bootstrapped costs per patient amounted to €12,475, of which 43% was for genetic tests (€5,321) and 25% for hospital visits (€3,112).
CONCLUSION: Currently, the diagnostic trajectories of paediatric patients who have complex neurological disease with a strong suspected genetic component are lengthy, resource-intensive, and low-yield. The data from this study provide a backdrop against which the introduction of novel techniques such as whole exome sequencing should be evaluated.
Copyright © 2014 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Diagnostics; Health care utilization; Neurological disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25604808     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2014.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol        ISSN: 1090-3798            Impact factor:   3.140


  19 in total

1.  Whole-exome sequencing in intellectual disability; cost before and after a diagnosis.

Authors:  Terry Vrijenhoek; Eline M Middelburg; Glen R Monroe; Koen L I van Gassen; Joost W Geenen; Anke M Hövels; Nine V Knoers; Hans Kristian Ploos van Amstel; Gerardus W J Frederix
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Economic evaluation of genomic sequencing in the paediatric population: a critical review.

Authors:  Khurshid Alam; Deborah Schofield
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Diagnostic Impact and Cost-effectiveness of Whole-Exome Sequencing for Ambulant Children With Suspected Monogenic Conditions.

Authors:  Tiong Yang Tan; Oliver James Dillon; Zornitza Stark; Deborah Schofield; Khurshid Alam; Rupendra Shrestha; Belinda Chong; Dean Phelan; Gemma R Brett; Emma Creed; Anna Jarmolowicz; Patrick Yap; Maie Walsh; Lilian Downie; David J Amor; Ravi Savarirayan; George McGillivray; Alison Yeung; Heidi Peters; Susan J Robertson; Aaron J Robinson; Ivan Macciocca; Simon Sadedin; Katrina Bell; Alicia Oshlack; Peter Georgeson; Natalie Thorne; Clara Gaff; Susan M White
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Care and cost consequences of pediatric whole genome sequencing compared to chromosome microarray.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Jasmin Bhawra; Kate Tsiplova; M Stephen Meyn; Nasim Monfared; Sarah Bowdin; D James Stavropoulos; Christian R Marshall; Raveen Basran; Cheryl Shuman; Shinya Ito; Iris Cohn; Courtney Hum; Marta Girdea; Michael Brudno; Ronald D Cohn; Stephen W Scherer; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  A Review of Health Economic Studies Comparing Traditional and Massively Parallel Sequencing Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Genetic Disorders.

Authors:  Patrick Fahr; James Buchanan; Sarah Wordsworth
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Clinical exome sequencing vs. usual care for hereditary colorectal cancer diagnosis: A pilot comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Xin Niu; Laura M Amendola; Ragan Hart; Caroline S Bennette; Patrick Heagerty; Martha Horike-Pyne; Susan B Trinidad; Elisabeth A Rosenthal; Bryan Comstock; Chris Nefcy; Fuki M Hisama; Robin L Bennett; William M Grady; Carlos J Gallego; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Stephanie M Fullerton; Wylie Burke; Dean A Regier; Michael O Dorschner; Brian H Shirts; Peggy D Robertson; Deborah A Nickerson; Donald L Patrick; Gail P Jarvik; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Deep Phenotyping on Electronic Health Records Facilitates Genetic Diagnosis by Clinical Exomes.

Authors:  Jung Hoon Son; Gangcai Xie; Chi Yuan; Lyudmila Ena; Ziran Li; Andrew Goldstein; Lulin Huang; Liwei Wang; Feichen Shen; Hongfang Liu; Karla Mehl; Emily E Groopman; Maddalena Marasa; Krzysztof Kiryluk; Ali G Gharavi; Wendy K Chung; George Hripcsak; Carol Friedman; Chunhua Weng; Kai Wang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Exploring the feasibility of delivering standardized genomic care using ophthalmology as an example.

Authors:  Niall Davison; Katherine Payne; Martin Eden; Marion McAllister; Stephen A Roberts; Stuart Ingram; Graeme C M Black; Georgina Hall
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Effectiveness of whole-exome sequencing and costs of the traditional diagnostic trajectory in children with intellectual disability.

Authors:  Glen R Monroe; Gerardus W Frederix; Sanne M C Savelberg; Tamar I de Vries; Karen J Duran; Jasper J van der Smagt; Paulien A Terhal; Peter M van Hasselt; Hester Y Kroes; Nanda M Verhoeven-Duif; Isaäc J Nijman; Ellen C Carbo; Koen L van Gassen; Nine V Knoers; Anke M Hövels; Mieke M van Haelst; Gepke Visser; Gijs van Haaften
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Orthogonal NGS for High Throughput Clinical Diagnostics.

Authors:  Niru Chennagiri; Eric J White; Alexander Frieden; Edgardo Lopez; Daniel S Lieber; Anastasia Nikiforov; Tristen Ross; Rebecca Batorsky; Sherry Hansen; Va Lip; Lovelace J Luquette; Evan Mauceli; David Margulies; Patrice M Milos; Nichole Napolitano; Marcia M Nizzari; Timothy Yu; John F Thompson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.