Literature DB >> 25604597

Population-based assessment of emergency room visits and hospitalizations among women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

Katherine Enright1, Eva Grunfeld2, Lingsong Yun2, Rahim Moineddin2, Mohammad Ghannam2, Susan Dent2, Andrea Eisen2, Maureen Trudeau2, Leonard Kaizer2, Craig Earle2, Monika K Krzyzanowska2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy is considered standard care for patients with lymph node (LN) -positive and high-risk LN-negative early breast cancer (EBC). Although chemotherapy-associated toxicities are documented in clinical trials, the impact of toxicities on emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations (ER + Hs) at a population level with contemporary chemotherapy is unknown. We undertook a population-based study of ER + Hs in patients with EBC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy compared with noncancer controls (NCCs).
METHODS: All patients diagnosed with EBC between January 2007 and December 2009 in Ontario, Canada, were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Patient records were linked deterministically to provincial health care databases to provide comprehensive medical follow-up. All patients received ≥ one cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient cases of EBC (n = 8,359) were matched to NCCs (n = 8,359) on age, comorbidity, and geographic location. ER + Hs within 30 days of chemotherapy were identified. If the primary reason for the visit was a common chemotherapy toxicity, the visit was considered chemotherapy associated. All-cause and chemotherapy-associated visits were compared between patient cases and controls. Logistic regression models were used to identify covariates associated with ER + Hs.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients with at least one ER + H was significantly higher in patients with EBC undergoing chemotherapy compared with NCCs (43.4% v 9.4%; P < .001). Patients with EBC were also more likely to have multiple ER + Hs (17.9% v 2.4%; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, comorbidity, receiving a regimen containing docetaxel, and certain geographic regions were associated with increased odds of ER + Hs.
CONCLUSION: ER + Hs are common among patients with EBC receiving chemotherapy and significantly higher than among controls. This represents a potential opportunity for quality improvement.
Copyright © 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25604597     DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  22 in total

1.  Has screening mammography become obsolete?

Authors:  M E Costanza
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Simulation of Chemotherapy Effects in Older Breast Cancer Patients With High Recurrence Scores.

Authors:  Young Chandler; Jinani C Jayasekera; Clyde B Schechter; Claudine Isaacs; Christopher J Cadham; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Cross-Canada differences in early-stage breast cancer treatment and acute-care use.

Authors:  M Powis; P Groome; N Biswanger; C Kendell; K M Decker; E Grunfeld; M L McBride; R Urquhart; M Winget; G A Porter; M K Krzyzanowska
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Effectiveness of Internet-based interventions in managing chemotherapy-related symptoms in patients with cancer: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  S Moradian; N Voelker; C Brown; G Liu; D Howell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Factors associated with receipt of symptom screening in the year after cancer diagnosis in a universal health care system: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  A L Mahar; L E Davis; L D Bubis; Q Li; R Sutradhar; N G Coburn; L Barbera
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  A population-based assessment of primary care visits during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  S J Bastedo; M K Krzyzanowska; R Moineddin; L Yun; K A Enright; E Grunfeld
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Does routine symptom screening with ESAS decrease ED visits in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy?

Authors:  L Barbera; R Sutradhar; D Howell; J Sussman; H Seow; D Dudgeon; C Atzema; C Earle; A Husain; Y Liu; M K Krzyzanowska
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  The association of continuity of care and cancer centre affiliation with outcomes among patients with cancer who require emergency department care.

Authors:  Keerat Grewal; Rinku Sutradhar; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Donald A Redelmeier; Clare L Atzema
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Outcomes after emergency department use in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Keerat Grewal; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Shelley McLeod; Bjug Borgundvaag; Clare L Atzema
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-08-12

10.  Predictors of Urgent Cancer Care Clinic and Emergency Department Visits for Individuals Diagnosed with Cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen Decker; Pascal Lambert; Katie Galloway; Oliver Bucher; Marshall Pitz; Benjamin Goldenberg; Harminder Singh; Mark Kristjanson; Tunji Fatoye; Eric J Bow
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.