Literature DB >> 25603944

Development and validation of a fatigue assessment scale for U.S. construction workers.

Mingzong Zhang1, Emily H Sparer, Lauren A Murphy, Jack T Dennerlein, Dongping Fang, Jeffrey N Katz, Alberto J Caban-Martinez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a fatigue assessment scale and test its reliability and validity for commercial construction workers.
METHODS: Using a two-phased approach, we first identified items (first phase) for the development of a Fatigue Assessment Scale for Construction Workers (FASCW) through review of existing scales in the scientific literature, key informant interviews (n = 11) and focus groups (three groups with six workers each) with construction workers. The second phase included assessment for the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the new scale using a repeated-measures study design with a convenience sample of construction workers (n = 144).
RESULTS: Phase one resulted in a 16-item preliminary scale that after factor analysis yielded a final 10-item scale with two sub-scales ("Lethargy" and "Bodily Ailment"). During phase two, the FASCW and its subscales demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (alpha coefficients were FASCW [0.91], Lethargy [0.86] and Bodily Ailment [0.84]) and acceptable test-retest reliability (Pearson Correlations Coefficients: 0.59-0.68; Intraclass Correlation Coefficients: 0.74-0.80). Correlation analysis substantiated concurrent and convergent validity. A discriminant analysis demonstrated that the FASCW differentiated between groups with arthritis status and different work hours.
CONCLUSIONS: The 10-item FASCW with good reliability and validity is an effective tool for assessing the severity of fatigue among construction workers.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  construction worker; fatigue; reliability; scale; sensitivity; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25603944      PMCID: PMC4677770          DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  30 in total

Review 1.  Defining and measuring fatigue.

Authors:  L S Aaronson; C S Teel; V Cassmeyer; G B Neuberger; L Pallikkathayil; J Pierce; A N Press; P D Williams; A Wingate
Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch       Date:  1999

2.  Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure: The Fatigue Assessment Scale.

Authors:  Helen J Michielsen; Jolanda De Vries; Guus L Van Heck
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  PATH: a work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work.

Authors:  B Buchholz; V Paquet; L Punnett; D Lee; S Moir
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Analysis of working postures in hammering tasks on building construction sites using the computerized OWAS method.

Authors:  M Mattila; W Karwowski; M Vilkki
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Development of a fatigue scale.

Authors:  T Chalder; G Berelowitz; T Pawlikowska; L Watts; S Wessely; D Wright; E P Wallace
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Dimensions of fatigue in different working populations.

Authors:  E Ahsberg
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2000-09

7.  Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure.

Authors:  A J Beurskens; U Bültmann; I Kant; J H Vercoulen; G Bleijenberg; G M Swaen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Construction and validation of a fatigue impact scale for daily administration (D-FIS).

Authors:  John D Fisk; Susan E Doble
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Predictors of subjective fatigue among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  B A Huyser; J C Parker; R Thoreson; K L Smarr; J C Johnson; R Hoffman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Construction trade and extraction workers: A population at high risk for drug use in the United States, 2005-2014.

Authors:  Danielle C Ompad; Robyn R Gershon; Simon Sandh; Patricia Acosta; Joseph J Palamar
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Development of the Fatigue Risk Assessment and Management in High-Risk Environments (FRAME) Survey: A Participatory Approach.

Authors:  Ashley E Shortz; Ranjana K Mehta; S Camille Peres; Mark E Benden; Qi Zheng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Mental Load and Fatigue Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jesús Díaz-García; Inmaculada González-Ponce; José Carlos Ponce-Bordón; Miguel Ángel López-Gajardo; Iván Ramírez-Bravo; Ana Rubio-Morales; Tomás García-Calvo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Validity and Reliability of the Staden Schizophrenia Anxiety Rating Scale.

Authors:  Werdie Van Staden; Antonia Dlagnekova; Kalai Naidu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  Development of an integrated fatigue measurement system for construction workers: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Sojeong Seong; Soyeon Park; Yong Han Ahn; Heejung Kim
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.135

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.