Francesco Briganti1, Luigi Delehaye2, Giuseppe Leone1, Carmine Sicignano2, Giuseppe Buono2, Mariano Marseglia1, Ferdinando Caranci1, Fabio Tortora3, Francesco Maiuri4. 1. Unit of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy. 2. Unit of Interventional Neuroradiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Naples, Italy. 3. "Magrassi Lanzara" Clinical-Surgical Department, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy. 4. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Experience with the endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms by flow diverter devices (FDD) is still limited. This study examines the results and complications of FDD for small aneurysms at this location. METHODS: From February 2010 to December 2013, 14 patients (10 women; mean age 59 years) with 15 small MCA aneurysms were treated with FDD. All procedures were performed with the Pipeline embolization device (PED). RESULTS: Complete occlusion was obtained in 12/15 aneurysms (80%) and partial occlusion in 3 (20%). Among 13 aneurysms with a side branch, this was patent at the angiographic control in 4 cases, showed decreased filling in 6, and was occluded in 3 (with neurological deficits in 2). All PEDs were patent at follow-up. Post-procedural ischemic complications occurred in 4 (27%) procedures with permanent neurological deficit (modified Rankin score 2) in 3 (21%). No early or delayed aneurysm rupture, no subarachnoid or intraparenchymal hemorrhage and no deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment with FDD is a relatively safe treatment for small MCA aneurysms resulting in a high occlusion rate. The findings of this study suggest that complete occlusion after endovascular treatment with FDD can be delayed (>6 months). Ischemic complications may occur as early or delayed, particularly at clopidogrel interruption. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
PURPOSE: Experience with the endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms by flow diverter devices (FDD) is still limited. This study examines the results and complications of FDD for small aneurysms at this location. METHODS: From February 2010 to December 2013, 14 patients (10 women; mean age 59 years) with 15 small MCA aneurysms were treated with FDD. All procedures were performed with the Pipeline embolization device (PED). RESULTS: Complete occlusion was obtained in 12/15 aneurysms (80%) and partial occlusion in 3 (20%). Among 13 aneurysms with a side branch, this was patent at the angiographic control in 4 cases, showed decreased filling in 6, and was occluded in 3 (with neurological deficits in 2). All PEDs were patent at follow-up. Post-procedural ischemic complications occurred in 4 (27%) procedures with permanent neurological deficit (modified Rankin score 2) in 3 (21%). No early or delayed aneurysm rupture, no subarachnoid or intraparenchymal hemorrhage and no deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment with FDD is a relatively safe treatment for small MCA aneurysms resulting in a high occlusion rate. The findings of this study suggest that complete occlusion after endovascular treatment with FDD can be delayed (>6 months). Ischemic complications may occur as early or delayed, particularly at clopidogrel interruption. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: Francesco Briganti; Giuseppe Leone; Mariano Marseglia; Giuseppe Mariniello; Ferdinando Caranci; Arturo Brunetti; Francesco Maiuri Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2015-08-27
Authors: Jean-Christophe Gentric; Robert Fahed; Tim E Darsaut; Igor Salazkin; Daniel Roy; Jean Raymond Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: F Cagnazzo; P Perrini; C Dargazanli; P-H Lefevre; G Gascou; R Morganti; D di Carlo; I Derraz; C Riquelme; A Bonafe; V Costalat Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J Caroff; H Neki; C Mihalea; F D'Argento; H Abdel Khalek; L Ikka; J Moret; L Spelle Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M S Park; C Kilburg; P Taussky; F C Albuquerque; D F Kallmes; E I Levy; P Jabbour; I Szikora; E Boccardi; R A Hanel; A Bonafé; C G McDougall Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 3.825