Literature DB >> 25602754

Emotional arousal and discount rate in intertemporal choice are reference dependent.

Karolina M Lempert1, Paul W Glimcher2, Elizabeth A Phelps1.   

Abstract

Many decisions involve weighing immediate gratification against future consequences. In such intertemporal choices, people often choose smaller, immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards. It has been proposed that emotional responses to immediate rewards lead us to choose them at our long-term expense. Here we utilize an objective measure of emotional arousal-pupil dilation-to examine the role of emotion in these decisions. We show that emotional arousal responses, as well as choices, in intertemporal choice tasks are reference-dependent and reflect the decision-maker's recent history of offers. Arousal increases when less predictable rewards are better than expected, whether those rewards are immediate or delayed. Furthermore, when immediate rewards are less predictable than delayed rewards, participants tend to be patient. When delayed rewards are less predictable, immediate rewards are preferred. Our findings suggest that we can encourage people to be more patient by changing the context in which intertemporal choices are made. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25602754      PMCID: PMC4388786          DOI: 10.1037/xge0000047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  31 in total

Review 1.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Attention and emotion: does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films?

Authors:  C A Hutcherson; P R Goldin; K N Ochsner; J D Gabrieli; L Feldman Barrett; J J Gross
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Laura Miccoli; Miguel A Escrig; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Like cognitive function, decision making across the life span shows profound age-related changes.

Authors:  Agnieszka Tymula; Lior A Rosenberg Belmaker; Lital Ruderman; Paul W Glimcher; Ifat Levy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Adolescents' risk-taking behavior is driven by tolerance to ambiguity.

Authors:  Agnieszka Tymula; Lior A Rosenberg Belmaker; Amy K Roy; Lital Ruderman; Kirk Manson; Paul W Glimcher; Ifat Levy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pupillometry: the eyes shed fresh light on the mind.

Authors:  Matthias Hartmann; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Development and validation of the Delaying Gratification Inventory.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Stuart W Quirk; Nathan C Weed
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2011-09

8.  Mapping self-reported to behavioral impulsiveness: the role of task parameters.

Authors:  Florian Lange; Frank Eggert
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2014-10-24

9.  Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Katherine M Rumsey; Robert C Wilson; Kinjan Parikh; Benjamin Heasly; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Tracking the allocation of attention using human pupillary oscillations.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; George A Alvarez; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-10
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice.

Authors:  Karolina M Lempert; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Emotional arousal predicts intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Karolina M Lempert; Eli Johnson; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-02-15

3.  Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Dianna R Amasino; Nicolette J Sullivan; Rachel E Kranton; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-02-25

4.  Modulation of Saccade Vigor during Value-Based Decision Making.

Authors:  Thomas R Reppert; Karolina M Lempert; Paul W Glimcher; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Missed losses loom larger than missed gains: Electrodermal reactivity to decision choices and outcomes in a gambling task.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Eric Van Dijk; Mike Aitken; Luke Clark
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Propranolol reduces reference-dependence in intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Karolina M Lempert; Sandra F Lackovic; Russell H Tobe; Paul W Glimcher; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Do adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Vinod Venkatraman; Laurence Steinberg; Jason M Chein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.