Literature DB >> 15946863

Attention and emotion: does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films?

C A Hutcherson1, P R Goldin, K N Ochsner, J D Gabrieli, L Feldman Barrett, J J Gross.   

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging of affective systems often includes subjective self-report of the affective response. Although self-report provides valuable information regarding participants' affective responses, prior studies have raised the concern that the attentional demands of reporting on affective experience may obscure neural activations reflecting more natural affective responses. In the present study, we used potent emotion-eliciting amusing and sad films, employed a novel method of continuous self-reported rating of emotion experience, and compared the impact of rating with passive viewing of amusing and sad films. Subjective rating of ongoing emotional responses did not decrease either self-reported experience of emotion or neural activations relative to passive viewing in any brain regions. Rating, relative to passive viewing, produced increased activity in anterior cingulate, insula, and several other areas associated with introspection of emotion. These results support the use of continuous emotion measures and emotionally engaging films to study the dynamics of emotional responding and suggest that there may be some contexts in which the attention to emotion induced by reporting emotion experience does not disrupt emotional responding either behaviorally or neurally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15946863     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  51 in total

1.  Processing emotional pictures and words: effects of valence and arousal.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  The Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Acute and Chronic Pain.

Authors:  David A Seminowicz; Massieh Moayedi
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Valence and salience contribute to nucleus accumbens activation.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Cooper; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Common and distinct brain networks underlying explicit emotional evaluation: a meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Kyung Hwa Lee; Greg J Siegle
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Functional grouping and cortical-subcortical interactions in emotion: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Hedy Kober; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Josh Joseph; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Kristen Lindquist; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Individual differences in dispositional mindfulness and brain activity involved in reappraisal of emotion.

Authors:  Gemma Modinos; Johan Ormel; André Aleman
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Multivariate neural biomarkers of emotional states are categorically distinct.

Authors:  Philip A Kragel; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Effects of aging on functional connectivity of the amygdala during negative evaluation: a network analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Peggy St Jacques; Florin Dolcos; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  Bolus isoproterenol infusions provide a reliable method for assessing interoceptive awareness.

Authors:  S S Khalsa; D Rudrauf; C Sandesara; B Olshansky; D Tranel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.