Literature DB >> 25602632

Optical coherence tomography-based positioning regimen for macular hole surgery.

David R Chow1, Khurram M Chaudhary.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based positioning regimen for patients undergoing macular hole surgery.
METHOD: We reviewed the medical records of all patients in our practice who underwent macular hole repair, instituting a modified OCT-based positioning regimen from November 1, 2011 through July 31, 2013. The regimen consisted of prone positioning at the conclusion of surgery with daily OCT imaging until the hole was confirmed closed at which point positioning was halted. Clinical data that were collected and recorded included visual acuities, stage of hole, size of hole, chronicity, preoperative and postoperative OCT imaging, and length of follow-up.
RESULTS: We identified 33 patients (35 eyes) with a mean baseline visual acuity of 20/220, a mean hole size of 465 μm. The mean final (postoperative) visual acuity was 20/135 with a mean follow-up of 7.7 months. Six patients (17%) in our study were diagnosed with myopic degeneration. Thirteen patients (37%) were found to have chronic (≥12 months) holes, and 19 (54%) were found to have large holes (>400 μm). Overall, 28 eyes (80%) had persistent closure of macular holes with an OCT-based positioning regimen. In the absence of high risk factors, such as myopic degeneration, chronic or large holes, the closure rate was 92%. In the presence of 2 or 3 of these risk factors, the closure rate was 85% and 74%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The presence of 2 or 3 high risk factors, such as myopic degeneration, chronic holes (≥12 months), or large holes (>400 μm) can compromise outcomes resulting in reopening after apparent early closure. Based on the presence of these risk factors, a modified postoperative positioning regimen can be used to obtain complete and persistent closure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25602632     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  8 in total

1.  Predictive Model for Macular Hole Closure Speed: Insights From Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Justis P Ehlers; Atsuro Uchida; Sunil K Srivastava; Ming Hu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 2.  Macular Holes: Main Clinical Presentations, Diagnosis, and Therapies.

Authors:  Elias Premi; Simone Donati; Lorenzo Azzi; Giovanni Porta; Cristian Metrangolo; Liviana Fontanel; Francesco Morescalchi; Claudio Azzolini
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 1.974

3.  Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) versus perfluoropropane (C3F8) tamponade and short term face-down position for macular hole repair: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Giamberto Casini; Pasquale Loiudice; Stefano De Cillà; Paolo Radice; Marco Nardi
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 4.  Pathogenesis and Management of Macular Hole: Review of Current Advances.

Authors:  Guzel Bikbova; Toshiyuki Oshitari; Takayuki Baba; Shuichi Yamamoto; Keisuke Mori
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  Factors Associated with Anatomic Failure and Hole Reopening after Macular Hole Surgery.

Authors:  Yutong Li; Siyan Jin; Lijun Shi; Hecong Qin; Jinsong Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 6.  Optimal management of idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Haifa A Madi; Ibrahim Masri; David H Steel
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-13

7.  Minification of fundus optical coherence tomographic images in gas-filled eye.

Authors:  Toshifumi Yamashita; Hiroto Terasaki; Taiji Sakamoto
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Treatment of Chronic Large and Persistent Macular Hole by a new technique in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Tanweer Hasan Khan; Syed Fawad Rizvi; Syed Asaad Mahmood; Lubna Feroz
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.