J Profit1, B A Goldstein2, J Tamaresis3, P Kan4, H C Lee5. 1. Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Palo Alto, California; profit@stanford.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. 4. Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California; 5. Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Palo Alto, California;
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Examination of regional care patterns in antenatal corticosteroid use (ACU) rates may be salient for the development of targeted interventions. Our objective was to assess network-level variation using California perinatal care regions as a proxy. We hypothesized that (1) significant variation in ACU exists within and between California perinatal care regions, and (2) lower performing regions exhibit greater NICU-level variability in ACU than higher performing regions. METHODS: We undertook cross-sectional analysis of 33,610 very low birth weight infants cared for at 120 hospitals in 11 California perinatal care regions from 2005 to 2011. We computed risk-adjusted median ACU rates and interquartile ranges (IQR) for each perinatal care region. The degree of variation was assessed using hierarchical multivariate regression analysis with NICU as a random effect and region as a fixed effect. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2011, mean ACU rates across California increased from 82% to 87.9%. Regional median (IQR) ACU rates ranged from 68.4% (24.3) to 92.9% (4.8). We found significant variation in ACU rates among regions (P < .0001). Compared with Level IV NICUs, care in a lower level of care was a strongly significant predictor of lower odds of receiving antenatal corticosteroids in a multilevel model (Level III, 0.65 [0.45-0.95]; Level II, 0.39 [0.24-0.64]; P < .001). Regions with lower performance in ACU exhibited greater variability in performance. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant variation in ACU rates among California perinatal regions. Regional quality improvement approaches may offer a new avenue to spread best practice.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Examination of regional care patterns in antenatal corticosteroid use (ACU) rates may be salient for the development of targeted interventions. Our objective was to assess network-level variation using California perinatal care regions as a proxy. We hypothesized that (1) significant variation in ACU exists within and between California perinatal care regions, and (2) lower performing regions exhibit greater NICU-level variability in ACU than higher performing regions. METHODS: We undertook cross-sectional analysis of 33,610 very low birth weight infants cared for at 120 hospitals in 11 California perinatal care regions from 2005 to 2011. We computed risk-adjusted median ACU rates and interquartile ranges (IQR) for each perinatal care region. The degree of variation was assessed using hierarchical multivariate regression analysis with NICU as a random effect and region as a fixed effect. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2011, mean ACU rates across California increased from 82% to 87.9%. Regional median (IQR) ACU rates ranged from 68.4% (24.3) to 92.9% (4.8). We found significant variation in ACU rates among regions (P < .0001). Compared with Level IV NICUs, care in a lower level of care was a strongly significant predictor of lower odds of receiving antenatal corticosteroids in a multilevel model (Level III, 0.65 [0.45-0.95]; Level II, 0.39 [0.24-0.64]; P < .001). Regions with lower performance in ACU exhibited greater variability in performance. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant variation in ACU rates among California perinatal regions. Regional quality improvement approaches may offer a new avenue to spread best practice.
Authors: David D Wirtschafter; Beate H Danielsen; Elliott K Main; Lisa M Korst; Kimberly D Gregory; Andrew Wertz; David K Stevenson; Jeffrey B Gould Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Roger F Soll; Erika M Edwards; Gary J Badger; Michael J Kenny; Kate A Morrow; Jeffrey S Buzas; Jeffrey D Horbar Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Elizabeth A Howell; Joanne Stone; Lawrence C Kleinman; Sarla Inamdar; Stephen Matseoane; Mark R Chassin Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2009-06-04
Authors: Brandon W Alleman; Edward F Bell; Lei Li; John M Dagle; P Brian Smith; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; Matthew M Laughon; Barbara J Stoll; Ronald N Goldberg; Waldemar A Carlo; Jeffrey C Murray; C Michael Cotten; Seetha Shankaran; Michele C Walsh; Abbot R Laptook; Dan L Ellsbury; Ellen C Hale; Nancy S Newman; Dennis D Wallace; Abhik Das; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jochen Profit; Jeffrey B Gould; Mihoko Bennett; Benjamin A Goldstein; David Draper; Ciaran S Phibbs; Henry C Lee Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jochen Profit; Jeffrey B Gould; Mihoko Bennett; Benjamin A Goldstein; David Draper; Ciaran S Phibbs; Henry C Lee Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; Jochen Profit; Eileen T Lake; Jessica B Liu; Lee M Sanders; Ciaran S Phibbs Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Nansi S Boghossian; Marco Geraci; Erika M Edwards; Danielle E Y Ehret; George R Saade; Jeffrey D Horbar Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 7.623
Authors: Elizabeth Wastnedge; Joshua Vogel; Jasper V Been; Cynthia Bannerman-Gyamfi; Ewoud Schuit; Devender Roberts; Rebecca M Reynolds; Sarah Stock Journal: Wellcome Open Res Date: 2020-02-25
Authors: Jennifer Zeitlin; Bradley N Manktelow; Aurelie Piedvache; Marina Cuttini; Elaine Boyle; Arno van Heijst; Janusz Gadzinowski; Patrick Van Reempts; Lene Huusom; Tom Weber; Stephan Schmidt; Henrique Barros; Dominico Dillalo; Liis Toome; Mikael Norman; Beatrice Blondel; Mercedes Bonet; Elisabeth S Draper; Rolf F Maier Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-07-05