Literature DB >> 25601720

Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.

Francesco Brigo1, Willem M Otte2, Stanley C Igwe3, Frediano Tezzon4, Raffaele Nardone5.   

Abstract

There is a general need for high-quality, easily accessible, and comprehensive health-care information on epilepsy to better inform the general population about this highly stigmatized neurological disorder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the health literacy level of eight popular English-written websites that provide information on epilepsy in quantitative terms of readability. Educational epilepsy material on these websites, including 41 Wikipedia articles, were analyzed for their overall level of readability and the corresponding academic grade level needed to comprehend the published texts on the first reading. The Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) was used to assess ease of comprehension while the Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Automated Readability Index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook scales estimated the corresponding academic grade level needed for comprehension. The average readability of websites yielded results indicative of a difficult-to-fairly-difficult readability level (FRE results: 44.0±8.2), with text readability corresponding to an 11th academic grade level (11.3±1.9). The average FRE score of the Wikipedia articles was indicative of a difficult readability level (25.6±9.5), with the other readability scales yielding results corresponding to a 14th grade level (14.3±1.7). Popular websites providing information on epilepsy, including Wikipedia, often demonstrate a low level of readability. This can be ameliorated by increasing access to clear and concise online information on epilepsy and health in general. Short "basic" summaries targeted to patients and nonmedical users should be added to articles published in specialist websites and Wikipedia to ease readability.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epilepsy; Health literacy; Internet; Readability; Wikipedia

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25601720     DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.12.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Behav        ISSN: 1525-5050            Impact factor:   2.937


  13 in total

Review 1.  Neurology and the Internet: a review.

Authors:  Marcello Moccia; Francesco Brigo; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Simona Bonavita; Luigi Lavorgna
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Readability, credibility and quality of patient information for hypogonadism and testosterone replacement therapy on the Internet.

Authors:  J A McBride; C C Carson; R M Coward
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Exploring the Readability of Ingredients Lists of Food Labels with Existing Metrics.

Authors:  Kathryn Cooper; William Gasper; Ricky Flores; Martina Clarke; Erin Bass; Leslie Evans; Jana Ponce
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  Readability of English, German, and Russian Disease-Related Wikipedia Pages: Automated Computational Analysis.

Authors:  Jelizaveta Gordejeva; Richard Zowalla; Monika Pobiruchin; Martin Wiesner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 7.076

5.  Quantitative readability analysis of websites providing information on traumatic brain injury and epilepsy: A need for clear communication.

Authors:  Daniel José Correa; Lindsey Milano; Churl-Su Kwon; Nathalie Jetté; Dennis Dlugos; Lauren Harte-Hargrove; Mary Jo Pugh; Jessica K Smith; Solomon L Moshé
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 6.  Epilepsy misconceptions and stigma reduction: Current status in Western countries.

Authors:  Lynn K Herrmann; Elisabeth Welter; Anne T Berg; Adam T Perzynski; Jamie R Van Doren; Martha Sajatovic
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.937

7.  A readability analysis of online mental health resources.

Authors:  Dorothy D Skierkowski; Paul Florin; Lisa L Harlow; Jason Machan; Yinjiao Ye
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2018-10-08

8.  Assessing the Readability of Medical Documents: A Ranking Approach.

Authors:  Jiaping Zheng; Hong Yu
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-03-23

9.  Lung cancer screening: assessment of health literacy and readability of online educational resources.

Authors:  Kevin Haas; Christie Brillante; Lisa Sharp; Ahmed K Elzokaky; Mary Pasquinelli; Lawrence Feldman; Kevin L Kovitz; Min Joo
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment.

Authors:  Abdulla Watad; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Francesco Brigo; Kassem Sharif; Howard Amital; Dennis McGonagle; Yehuda Shoenfeld; Mohammad Adawi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.