Literature DB >> 25601383

Surface replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthropathy in patients aged younger than fifty years: results after a minimum ten-year follow-up.

Ofer Levy1, Oren Tsvieli2, Julia Merchant2, Lora Young2, Alberto Trimarchi2, Rupen Dattani2, Ruben Abraham2, Stephen A Copeland2, Ali Narvani2, Ehud Atoun2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (CSRA) in young individuals is currently unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate CSRA long-term results for glenohumeral arthritis in young patients.
METHODS: Between 1990 and 2003, 54 CSRAs were performed on 49 patients (25 men, 24 women) aged younger than 50 years. Mean age was 38.9 years (range, 22-50 years). Three patients (4 shoulders) died over time and 8 were lost to follow-up, leaving 38 patients (42 shoulders) with a mean follow-up of 14.5 years (range, 10-25 years). There were 17 total shoulder replacements with metal back glenoid, and 37 underwent humeral head resurfacing with microfracture of the glenoid.
RESULTS: The indications were avascular necrosis, 16; rheumatoid arthritis, 20; instability arthropathy, 7; primary osteoarthritis, 5; fracture sequelae, 3; postinfection arthritis, 2; and psoriatic arthritis, 1. The mean relative Constant score increased from 11.5% to 71.8% (P < .0001), and the mean patient satisfaction at final follow-up was 8.7 of 10. The mean relative Constant score for the humeral head resurfacing with microfracture of the glenoid improved to 77.7% compared with 58.1% for total resurfacing arthroplasty. Two required early arthrodesis due to instability and deep infection. Seven were revised to stemmed prosthesis: 1 for traumatic fracture and 1 for glenoid erosion 16 years after the index procedure. Five shoulders in 4 patients (4 rheumatoid arthritis, 1 avascular necrosis) were revised at 8 to 14 years after surgery for cuff failure and loosening. Three were revised to stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to rotator cuff failure at 23, 16, and 13 years after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: CSRA provides good long-term symptomatic and functional results in the treatment of glenohumeral arthropathy in patients aged younger than 50 years in 81.6% of the patients. This improvement is maintained over more than 10 years after surgery, with high patient satisfaction (8.7 of 10). However, 10 shoulders (of 54) (18.5%) underwent revision arthroplasty. Resurfacing offers a valuable tool in treating young patients with glenohumeral arthritis, providing reasonably good long-term results in 81.6% of the patients, while allowing preservation of bone stock if the need for revision arises. All the revision arthroplasty options are preserved, including less invasive procedures.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; cementless; hydroxyapatite; resurfacing; shoulder; surface replacement; young

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25601383     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.11.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  17 in total

1.  Clinical and radiological results 7 years after Copeland shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: an independent multicentre retrospective study.

Authors:  F U Verstraelen; L A Horta; M G M Schotanus; N P Kort; S K Samijo; E J P Jansen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-08-03

2.  Is the humeral stem useful in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Philippe Collin; Tetsu Matsukawa; Pascal Boileau; Ulrich Brunner; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  What is a "periprosthetic shoulder infection"? A systematic review of two decades of publications.

Authors:  Jason E Hsu; Jeremy S Somerson; Kiet V Vo; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Software simulations of changing offsets and thus soft tissue tension when revising anatomic to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in convertible platform systems.

Authors:  Albert Ferrando; Luis Natera; Berta Buch; Paolo Consigliere; Juan Bruguera; Giuseppe Sforza; Ehud Atoun; Ofer Levy
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-10-22

5.  Radiological and functional 24-month outcomes of resurfacing versus stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael C Glanzmann; Christoph Kolling; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Matthias Flury; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Preoperative Comorbidities and Postoperative Complications Do Not Influence Patient-Reported Satisfaction Following Humeral Head Resurfacing: Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of 106 Patients.

Authors:  Andrea Beck; Hannah Lee; Mitchell Fourman; Juan Giugale; Jason Zlotnicki; Mark Rodosky; Albert Lin
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2019-02-13

Review 7.  Shoulder Arthroplasty Options for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis in Young and Active Patients (<60 Years Old): A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hélder Fonte; Tiago Amorim-Barbosa; Sara Diniz; Luís Barros; Joaquim Ramos; Rui Claro
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-03-23

8.  Comparison of shoulder replacement to treat osteoarthritis secondary to instability surgery and primary osteoarthritis: a retrospective controlled study of patient outcomes.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Simone Cerciello; Stefano Marenco; Elisabetta Fabbri; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  In vitro comparison of wear characteristics of PyroCarbon and metal on bone: Shoulder hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Jerome J Klawitter; Jason Patton; Robert More; Noel Peter; Evgeny Podnos; Mark Ross
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-09-11

10.  6-Year clinical results and survival of Copeland Resurfacing hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in a consecutive series of 279 cases.

Authors:  Andrew P Dekker; Nirad Joshi; Marie Morgan; Marius Espag; Amol A Tambe; David I Clark
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.