Literature DB >> 25601005

Configural and featural face processing are differently modulated by attentional resources at early stages: an event-related potential study with rapid serial visual presentation.

Hailing Wang1, Pei Sun1, Chengteng Ip1, Xin Zhao1, Shimin Fu2.   

Abstract

It is widely reported that face recognition relies on two dissociable mechanisms, the featural and the configural processing. However, it is unclear whether these two processing types involve different neural mechanisms and are differently modulated by attentional resources. Using the attentional blink (AB) paradigm, we aimed to investigate the effect of attentional resources on configural and featural face processing by recording event-related potentials (ERPs). The amount of attentional resources was manipulated as deficient or sufficient by presenting the second target (T2) in or out of the AB period, respectively. We found that in addition to a traditional P3 attention effect, the amplitude of N170/VPP to the T2 stimuli was also sensitive to attentional resources, suggesting that attention affects face processing at an earlier perceptual processing stage. More importantly, configural face processing elicited a larger posterior P1 compared to featural face processing, but only when the attentional resources were sufficient. In contrast, the anterior N1 was larger for configural relative to featural face processing only when the attentional resources were deficient. These results suggest that early stages of configural and featural face processing are differently modulated by attentional resources, possibly with different underlying mechanisms.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Attentional resource; Event-related potential (ERP); Face processing; N170; P1

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25601005     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  6 in total

1.  Early and late cortical responses to directly gazing faces are task dependent.

Authors:  Nicolas Burra; David Framorando; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The Time Sequence of Face Spatial Frequency Differs During Working Memory Encoding and Retrieval Stages.

Authors:  Anqing Wang; Enguang Chen; Hang Zhang; Chinheg H Borjigin; Hailing Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  N170 Reveals the Categorical Perception Effect of Emotional Valence.

Authors:  Ruyi Qiu; Hailing Wang; Shimin Fu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-24

4.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Featural and Spacing Processing for Face and Non-face Stimuli.

Authors:  Marcello Negrini; Diandra Brkić; Sara Pizzamiglio; Isabella Premoli; Davide Rivolta
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-13

5.  Brain Activity Related to the Judgment of Face-Likeness: Correlation between EEG and Face-Like Evaluation.

Authors:  Yuji Nihei; Tetsuto Minami; Shigeki Nakauchi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Configural but Not Featural Face Information Is Associated With Automatic Processing.

Authors:  Hailing Wang; Enguang Chen; JingJing Li; Fanglin Ji; Yujing Lian; Shimin Fu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.