András Bratincsák1,2, Matthew Williams3,4, Chieko Kimata5, James C Perry3,4. 1. Division of Cardiology, Kapiolani Medical Specialists, Hawaii Pacific Health, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, Calif, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif, USA. 5. Patient Safety & Quality Services, Hawaii Pacific Health, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is used to detect left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in children and young adults, and it is considered an important screening tool for the most common causes of sudden cardiac arrest in the United States. However, the reliability and accuracy of the ECG in the detection of LVH are poorly understood. This study's objective was to assess the reliability and accuracy of ECG parameters predicting LVH in comparison with echocardiographic two-dimensional left ventricular mass (2D-LVM) assessment. DESIGN: Two hundred fifty patients met study criteria with complete 2D-LVM measurements, temporally matched ECGs and no confounding structural heart defects. The echocardiographic diagnosis of LVH was made by 2D-LVM z-score > 2. The electrocardiographic diagnosis of LVH was fulfilled if specific Q, R, or S wave voltages exceeded the normal limits for the respective age groups established by the Davignon, Macfarlane and Rijnbeek datasets, or fulfilled the LVH criteria set forth by adult indices (Sokolow-Lyon, Cornell, Gubner, Romhilt-Estes). RESULTS: None of the ECG parameters showed significant correlation with 2D-LVM z-scores. In the detection of LVH, the most commonly used R in V6 voltages showed the following results: sensitivity 13-29%, specificity 77-96%, positive predictive value (PPV) 29-50%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 77%. The overall accuracy ranged 65-75%. The accuracy of adult indices for LVH ranged from 49% to 78%. CONCLUSIONS: The ECG's prediction of LVH is unreliable with dismal sensitivity, variable specificity, poor PPV, and barely acceptable NPV. With such overall poor reliability, the use of current ECG standards in screening for LVH warrants reassessment.
OBJECTIVE: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is used to detect left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in children and young adults, and it is considered an important screening tool for the most common causes of sudden cardiac arrest in the United States. However, the reliability and accuracy of the ECG in the detection of LVH are poorly understood. This study's objective was to assess the reliability and accuracy of ECG parameters predicting LVH in comparison with echocardiographic two-dimensional left ventricular mass (2D-LVM) assessment. DESIGN: Two hundred fifty patients met study criteria with complete 2D-LVM measurements, temporally matched ECGs and no confounding structural heart defects. The echocardiographic diagnosis of LVH was made by 2D-LVM z-score > 2. The electrocardiographic diagnosis of LVH was fulfilled if specific Q, R, or S wave voltages exceeded the normal limits for the respective age groups established by the Davignon, Macfarlane and Rijnbeek datasets, or fulfilled the LVH criteria set forth by adult indices (Sokolow-Lyon, Cornell, Gubner, Romhilt-Estes). RESULTS: None of the ECG parameters showed significant correlation with 2D-LVM z-scores. In the detection of LVH, the most commonly used R in V6 voltages showed the following results: sensitivity 13-29%, specificity 77-96%, positive predictive value (PPV) 29-50%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 77%. The overall accuracy ranged 65-75%. The accuracy of adult indices for LVH ranged from 49% to 78%. CONCLUSIONS: The ECG's prediction of LVH is unreliable with dismal sensitivity, variable specificity, poor PPV, and barely acceptable NPV. With such overall poor reliability, the use of current ECG standards in screening for LVH warrants reassessment.
Authors: Laura C Steinhardt; Thomas L Richie; Reuben Yego; Dorcas Akach; Mary J Hamel; Julie R Gutman; Ryan E Wiegand; Elizabeth L Nzuu; Allan Dungani; Natasha Kc; Tooba Murshedkar; L W Preston Church; B Kim Lee Sim; Peter F Billingsley; Eric R James; Yonas Abebe; Simon Kariuki; Aaron M Samuels; Kephas Otieno; Tony Sang; S Patrick Kachur; David Styers; Kelly Schlessman; Ginnie Abarbanell; Stephen L Hoffman; Robert A Seder; Martina Oneko Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 9.079