M M Rasmussen1, J Kutzenberger2, K Krogh3, F Zepke2, C Bodin4, B Domurath2, P Christensen5. 1. 1] Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark [2] Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 2. Department of Neuro-Urology, Werner-Wicker-Klinik, Bad Wildungen-Reinhardhausen, Germany. 3. Neurogastroenterology Unit, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 5. Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effect of the sacral anterior root stimulator (SARS) on neurogenic bowel dysfunction in a large, well defined spinal cord injury (SCI) cohort. SETTING: Department of Neuro-Urology, Bad Wildungen, Germany. METHODS: Subjects undergone surgery at for SARS-SDAF (sacral deafferentation) between September 1986 and July 2011 (n=587) answered a questionnaire. In total, 277 SARS subjects were available for the baseline (recall) and follow-up comparison. RESULTS: Median age was 49 years (range: 19-80), time from SCI to surgery was 10 years (range: 0-49) and from surgery to follow-up 13 (range: 1-25). Of the responders 73% used SARS for bowel emptying. On visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 (best), satisfaction with SARS was 10. Baseline and follow-up comparison showed a decline in the median VAS score 0-10 (worst) for bowel symptoms from 6 (range: 4-8) to 4 (range: 2-6), P<0.0001; median neurogenic bowel dysfunction score from 17 (range: 11-2) to 11 (range: 9-15), P<0.0001; median St Marks score from 4 (range: 0-7) to 4 (range: 0-5), P=0.01; and median Cleveland constipation score from 7 (range: 6-10) to 6 (range: 4-8), P<0.0001. Use of suppositories, digital evacuation and mini enema and subjects totally dependent on assistance during defecation were significantly lower after SARS. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS has the potential to be one of the few treatment methods targeting multiple organ dysfunctions following SCI.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effect of the sacral anterior root stimulator (SARS) on neurogenic bowel dysfunction in a large, well defined spinal cord injury (SCI) cohort. SETTING: Department of Neuro-Urology, Bad Wildungen, Germany. METHODS: Subjects undergone surgery at for SARS-SDAF (sacral deafferentation) between September 1986 and July 2011 (n=587) answered a questionnaire. In total, 277 SARS subjects were available for the baseline (recall) and follow-up comparison. RESULTS: Median age was 49 years (range: 19-80), time from SCI to surgery was 10 years (range: 0-49) and from surgery to follow-up 13 (range: 1-25). Of the responders 73% used SARS for bowel emptying. On visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 (best), satisfaction with SARS was 10. Baseline and follow-up comparison showed a decline in the median VAS score 0-10 (worst) for bowel symptoms from 6 (range: 4-8) to 4 (range: 2-6), P<0.0001; median neurogenic bowel dysfunction score from 17 (range: 11-2) to 11 (range: 9-15), P<0.0001; median St Marks score from 4 (range: 0-7) to 4 (range: 0-5), P=0.01; and median Cleveland constipation score from 7 (range: 6-10) to 6 (range: 4-8), P<0.0001. Use of suppositories, digital evacuation and mini enema and subjects totally dependent on assistance during defecation were significantly lower after SARS. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS has the potential to be one of the few treatment methods targeting multiple organ dysfunctions following SCI.
Authors: Steven C Kirshblum; Stephen P Burns; Fin Biering-Sorensen; William Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei Krassioukov; M J Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Waring Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: T Juul; G Bazzocchi; M Coggrave; I L Johannesen; R B M Hansen; C Thiyagarajan; E Poletti; K Krogh; P Christensen Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Anil Thomas George; Thomas C Dudding; Salma Gurmany; Michael A Kamm; Ralph J Nicholls; Carolynne J Vaizey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Denise G Tate; Tracey Wheeler; Giulia I Lane; Martin Forchheimer; Kim D Anderson; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Anne P Cameron; Bruno Gallo Santacruz; Lyn B Jakeman; Michael J Kennelly; Steve Kirshblum; Andrei Krassioukov; Klaus Krogh; M J Mulcahey; Vanessa K Noonan; Gianna M Rodriguez; Ann M Spungen; David Tulsky; Marcel W Post Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Ronald Sahyouni; Amin Mahmoodi; Jefferson W Chen; David T Chang; Omid Moshtaghi; Hamid R Djalilian; Harrison W Lin Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 3.042