STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed as an international validation study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the inter-rater reliability of the International Spinal Cord Injury Bowel Function Basic and Extended Data Sets. SETTING: Three European spinal cord injury centers. METHODS: In total, 73 subjects with spinal cord injury and a history of bowel dysfunction, out of which 77% were men and median age of the subjects was 49 years (range 20-81), were studied. The inter-rater reliability was estimated by having two raters complete both data sets on the same subject. First and second tests were separated by 14 days. Cohen's kappa was computed as a measure of agreement between raters. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability assessed by kappa statistics was very good (≥0.81) in 5 items, good (0.61-0.80) in 11 items, moderate (0.41-0.60) in 20 items, fair (0.21-0.40) in 11 and poor (<0.20) in 5 items. CONCLUSION: Most items within the International Spinal Cord Injury Bowel Function Data sets have acceptable inter-rater reliability and are useful tools for data collection in international clinical practice and research. However, minor adjustments are recommended.
STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed as an international validation study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the inter-rater reliability of the International Spinal Cord Injury Bowel Function Basic and Extended Data Sets. SETTING: Three European spinal cord injury centers. METHODS: In total, 73 subjects with spinal cord injury and a history of bowel dysfunction, out of which 77% were men and median age of the subjects was 49 years (range 20-81), were studied. The inter-rater reliability was estimated by having two raters complete both data sets on the same subject. First and second tests were separated by 14 days. Cohen's kappa was computed as a measure of agreement between raters. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability assessed by kappa statistics was very good (≥0.81) in 5 items, good (0.61-0.80) in 11 items, moderate (0.41-0.60) in 20 items, fair (0.21-0.40) in 11 and poor (<0.20) in 5 items. CONCLUSION: Most items within the International Spinal Cord Injury Bowel Function Data sets have acceptable inter-rater reliability and are useful tools for data collection in international clinical practice and research. However, minor adjustments are recommended.
Authors: F Biering-Sørensen; S Alai; K Anderson; S Charlifue; Y Chen; M DeVivo; A E Flanders; L Jones; N Kleitman; A Lans; V K Noonan; J Odenkirchen; J Steeves; K Tansey; E Widerström-Noga; L B Jakeman Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: K Krogh; A Emmanuel; B Perrouin-Verbe; M A Korsten; M J Mulcahey; F Biering-Sørensen Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: M M Rasmussen; J Kutzenberger; K Krogh; F Zepke; C Bodin; B Domurath; P Christensen Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Denise G Tate; Tracey Wheeler; Giulia I Lane; Martin Forchheimer; Kim D Anderson; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Anne P Cameron; Bruno Gallo Santacruz; Lyn B Jakeman; Michael J Kennelly; Steve Kirshblum; Andrei Krassioukov; Klaus Krogh; M J Mulcahey; Vanessa K Noonan; Gianna M Rodriguez; Ann M Spungen; David Tulsky; Marcel W Post Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Kathryn Dent; Kathy Zebracki; Cristina Sadowsky; Rebecca Martin; Andrea Behrman; Bethany Lipa; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Lawrence C Vogel; M J Mulcahey Journal: Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil Date: 2021-10-25