Jacob Breaux1, Roneisha McLendon2, Robin B Stedman3, Ronald G Amedee4, Janice Piazza5, Robert Wolterman6. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. 2. Department of Anesthesia, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. 3. Department of Anesthesia, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA ; The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA. 4. Department of Otolaryngology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA ; The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA. 5. Department of Graduate Medical Education, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. 6. Ochsner Medical Center, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Duty hour restrictions imposed upon training physicians have led to increased handoffs and the potential for discontinuity in patient care. Research has demonstrated a significant opportunity for decreasing errors with a standardized handoff process. Thus, we designed a project to implement a standardized approach to handoffs, specifically resident-to-resident handoffs. METHODS: We performed an initial assessment of the tools, practices, and policies currently in use to facilitate handoffs institutionally. Subsequently, we created a template within our electronic medical record and paired it with a verbal handoff process. We developed a plan to build department champions to disseminate information and provide mentorship. We intend to evaluate this process at designated intervals to ensure sustainability. RESULTS: Survey results were obtained from 45 faculty and 61 residents from a wide representation of specialties. We found that although a subjective sense of satisfaction was present, there was substantial variability between processes. Seventy-two percent of faculty reported at least once identifying a patient safety issue that occurred as a result of the handoff process, but 77% of faculty sometimes or never supervised the process. Eighty percent of residents reported sometimes or never receiving feedback on their handoffs. CONCLUSIONS: Based on medicine's evolving environment and an apparent opportunity to optimize resident training and patient safety, we developed a plan to standardize, implement, and evaluate resident handoffs within our system. The results thus far have resulted in a gap analysis that will serve as the basis for reporting finalized data at the conclusion of this prospective study.
BACKGROUND: Duty hour restrictions imposed upon training physicians have led to increased handoffs and the potential for discontinuity in patient care. Research has demonstrated a significant opportunity for decreasing errors with a standardized handoff process. Thus, we designed a project to implement a standardized approach to handoffs, specifically resident-to-resident handoffs. METHODS: We performed an initial assessment of the tools, practices, and policies currently in use to facilitate handoffs institutionally. Subsequently, we created a template within our electronic medical record and paired it with a verbal handoff process. We developed a plan to build department champions to disseminate information and provide mentorship. We intend to evaluate this process at designated intervals to ensure sustainability. RESULTS: Survey results were obtained from 45 faculty and 61 residents from a wide representation of specialties. We found that although a subjective sense of satisfaction was present, there was substantial variability between processes. Seventy-two percent of faculty reported at least once identifying a patient safety issue that occurred as a result of the handoff process, but 77% of faculty sometimes or never supervised the process. Eighty percent of residents reported sometimes or never receiving feedback on their handoffs. CONCLUSIONS: Based on medicine's evolving environment and an apparent opportunity to optimize resident training and patient safety, we developed a plan to standardize, implement, and evaluate resident handoffs within our system. The results thus far have resulted in a gap analysis that will serve as the basis for reporting finalized data at the conclusion of this prospective study.
Authors: Amy J Starmer; Jennifer K O'Toole; Glenn Rosenbluth; Sharon Calaman; Dorene Balmer; Daniel C West; James F Bale; Clifton E Yu; Elizabeth L Noble; Lisa L Tse; Rajendu Srivastava; Christopher P Landrigan; Theodore C Sectish; Nancy D Spector Journal: Acad Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Eugene S Chu; Mark Reid; Tara Schulz; Marisha Burden; Diana Mancini; Amrut V Ambardekar; Angela Keniston; Richard K Albert Journal: Acad Med Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Hanan Aboumatar; Robert D Allison; Leonard Feldman; Kevin Woods; Patricia Thomas; Charles Wiener Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 1.852