Literature DB >> 25594997

Sweat the small stuff: a case study of small-scale change processes and consequences in acute care.

Cíara Moore1, David A Buchanan2.   

Abstract

Solving small, annoying problems may appear to be unimportant in a political, demographic, and economic climate that focuses attention on radical long-term changes to the organization, delivery, funding, and regulation of the healthcare system. Most contemporary commentary emphasizes the need for large-scale, major, strategic, transformational change. Deliberately designed to focus on minor issues, however, the intervention reported here, in a hospital gastroenterology department, demonstrates how small changes generate major benefits for patients, staff, and hospital performance. This approach can also strengthen clinical-managerial relationships, which are key to larger scale changes and which suffer when 'the small stuff' is not fixed. The success of this intervention is explained with reference to a model of change combining context, content, process, and individual dispositions. The intervention, however, is easily modified to suit different contexts and was subsequently used successfully in other service areas in the same hospital. These outcomes present a challenge to the contemporary preoccupation with transformational change. Healthcare managers are thus advised, on the basis of this experience, to be alert to what appear to be minor unresolved issues, and to address these rapidly, in addition to larger scale, longer term projects.
© The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute hospital care; medical–managerial relationships; organizational change; problem solving; processual perspective

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 25594997     DOI: 10.1177/0951484813488060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Manage Res        ISSN: 0951-4848


  6 in total

1.  Translating staff experience into organisational improvement: the HEADS-UP stepped wedge, cluster controlled, non-randomised trial.

Authors:  Samuel Pannick; Thanos Athanasiou; Susannah J Long; Iain Beveridge; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Why is patient safety so hard in low-income countries? A qualitative study of healthcare workers' views in two African hospitals.

Authors:  Emma-Louise Aveling; Yvette Kayonga; Ansha Nega; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 3.  What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis.

Authors:  David Clarke; Fiona Jones; Ruth Harris; Glenn Robert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  How the Integration of Telehealth and Coordinated Care Approaches Impact Health Care Service Organization Structure and Ethos: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Rosemary Davidson; David Ian Barrett; Lorna Rixon; Stanton Newman
Journal:  JMIR Nurs       Date:  2020-10-09

Review 5.  Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Richard Baker; Kathryn Charles; Jeremy Dawson; Gabi Jerzembek; Graham Martin; Imelda McCarthy; Lorna McKee; Joel Minion; Piotr Ozieranski; Janet Willars; Patricia Wilkie; Michael West
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 7.418

6.  Organizational conditions for engagement in quality and safety improvement: a longitudinal qualitative study of community pharmacies.

Authors:  Denham L Phipps; Christian E L Jones; Dianne Parker; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.