Literature DB >> 25593424

Effect of intense pulsed light on immature burn scars: A clinical study.

Arindam Sarkar1, Yatindra Kumar Dewangan1, Jayanta Bain1, Pritha Rakshit1, Krishnanand Dhruw1, Sandip Kanti Basu1, Jayanta Kumar Saha1, Bijay Kumar Majumdar1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As intense pulsed light (IPL) is widely used to treat cutaneous vascular malformations and also used as non-ablative skin rejunuvation to remodel the skin collagen. A study has been undertaken to gauze the effect of IPL on immature burn scars with regard to vascularity, pliability and height.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted between June 2013 and May 2014, among patients with immature burn scars that healed conservatively within 2 months. Photographic evidence of appearance of scars and grading and rating was done with Vancouver Scar Scale parameters. Ratings were done for both case and control scar after the completion of four IPL treatment sessions and were compared.
RESULTS: Out of the 19 cases, vascularity, pliability and height improved significantly (P < 0.05) in 13, 14 and 11 scars respectively following IPL treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Intense pulsed light was well-tolerated by patients, caused good improvement in terms of vascularity, pliability, and height of immature burn scar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burn scar; intense pulse light; vancouver scar scale

Year:  2014        PMID: 25593424      PMCID: PMC4292116          DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.146596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0970-0358


INTRODUCTION

Natural history of deep burns is that, they heal by post-burn scars; and the extent and magnitude of scarring is directly related to the severity of burn, duration of healing process. Burn scar has a huge impact on the mental health of the patient; it also causes considerable functional morbidity, such as contractures, hypertrophic scar, keloid, and neuropathic pain.[1] Hence, the management of post-burn scar is a huge challenge.[2] Burn wound heal with secondary intention and it often had a long overlapping inflammatory, proliferative and remodelling phase. Proliferative phase is characterized by granulation tissue which is composed of three cell types, namely fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and keratinocytes. Fibroblast may play a major role in synthesis of extracelluler matrix. Endothelial cells form new blood vessels and keratinocytes migrates over the granulation tissue to cover it. In remodelling phase the scar matures, which may take several month to years, is by far the least-understood phase of wound healing. This phase is characterised by replacement of the initially laid down type III collagen by type I collagen[3] which are more thicker and stable;[4]. Collagen remodelling, causes regression of blood vessels and the wound becomes contracted by the actions of myofibroblasts.[3] Thus initially the immature burn scar remains hyper vascular (containing oxy-haemoglobin), collagen and water. These bio-molecules present in the scar are conventionally used as the target chromophore for various laser treatments with good results.[5678] At present, there are very few studies on the use of intense pulsed light (IPL) for the treatment of immature burn scars;[9] Hence aim of this study was to appreciate the effect of IPL on immature burn scar in the terms of colour, thickness and pliability of the scar.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a 1-year (June 2013 to May 2014) prospective, non-randomised, case — control study conducted in the Department of Plastic Surgery in our institution. Before starting the study, Institutional Ethical Committee clearance was taken.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Cooperative patients above 10 years of age who had newly healed immature burn scars were taken up for this study. They had immature scars of partial thickness burns that healed by conservative treatment in 2 months without skin grafting. Similar adjacent scars were taken as controls. Hypertrophic scar were excluded from the study. In these selected patients no other form of therapy was applied.

Wound assessment

Photographic evidence of appearance of scars and grading and rating was done with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS)[10] parameters based on vascularity, pliability and height before the start of treatment. Vascularity of the scar was assessed by inspection and photographic evidence of the colour of the scar. Pliability was measured by applying torsion force over the surface of scar in the horizontal plane.[1112] Height was measured with measuring scale by keeping it tangentially at the normal skin and scar junction. Scars were considered hypertrophic when the scores of vascularity and height were grade 2 or grade 3 and pliability grade 3 or grade 4 or grade 5. Hypertrophic scars were excluded from study. All these 3 parameters were rated using VSS at the start of treatment. Photographs were taken with 4 mega pixel camera at a distance of 30-40 cm in a good illumination capturing both the case and control scars simultaneously. Setting of the camera kept same for all patients.

Settings of intense pulsed light machine

It is kept common for all patients at Chiller at maximum; wavelength 590 nm; fluence 25 J/cm2; size of the glass piece of hand piece was 1 cm × 4 cm through which light passes to the scars.

Treatment procedure

Patient was instructed to apply surface anaesthetic cream locally on the treatment area half an hour before the start of IPL session. After removal of anaesthetic cream the Ultrasound electro gel was applied over treatment area and IPL therapy given to the case scars by just touching the surface of scar with the Glass piece of hand piece of IPL machine and triggering the pulse, without overlapping with the previous spot. After the treatment session ice pack was applied to treatment area to minimize the discomfort associated with the treatment. Antibiotic ointment along with steroid is advised for local application. Patient was asked to come for successive treatments after 21 days each for 4 times. Photographic records were kept before every session of treatment [Figures 1a, b, 2a and b].
Figure 1a

Pre-treatment photograph of case 1

Figure 1b

Post-treatment (after 4 session of intense pulsed light) photograph of case 1

Figure 2a

Pre-treatment photograph of case 16

Figure 2b

Post-treatment (after 4 session of intense pulsed light) photograph of case 16

Pre-treatment photograph of case 1 Post-treatment (after 4 session of intense pulsed light) photograph of case 1 Pre-treatment photograph of case 16 Post-treatment (after 4 session of intense pulsed light) photograph of case 16

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software version 11.0.1 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Chi-square test was used to examine the associations between categorical outcome variables with the IPL treatment. All statistical tests were two sided. P < 0.05 were considered as significant.

RESULTS

Twenty four patients got enrolled during the period of study, of which 2 patients did not come for first treatment, 3 patients were treated only once thereafter they were lost to follow up and hence total 19 patients were studied. Of 19 patients only 3 were male and rests were female. All patients were between the ages of 10-40 years [Table 1].
Table 1

Clinical profile of the study population

Clinical profile of the study population Majority of immature scars selected for study had vascularity about grade 2, pliability around grade 2 and height about grade 1 in grading as per VSS scale. Both the adjacent scars were comparable in all patients according to VSS parameters. Vascularity decreased in 13 scars and they became pink from red with IPL treatment compared to control scars where only in 1 out of 19 cases showed such change without treatment (P < 0.05). In terms of pliability, 14 scars improved after IPL treatment and became supple from yielding, while, only 2 scars improved in the control arm (P < 0.05) of 19 cases. And height of 11 scars became near normal (flat) with the IPL treatment, whereas, only 1 scar improved in control arm (P < 0.05) [Table 2].
Table 2

Comparison of scars after the completion of 4 sitting of treatments in terms of VSS parameters

Comparison of scars after the completion of 4 sitting of treatments in terms of VSS parameters The procedure (IPL sessions) were well-tolerated by patients; most patients complained only mild snapping sensation after proper surface anaesthetics application.

DISCUSSION

Intense pulsed light, commonly abbreviated as IPL, describes the use of intense pulses of non-coherent light distributed over a range of wavelengths from 500 nm to 1200 nm.[13] Although not technically a laser, IPL works on the principles of laser, that is, selective photothermolysis, which says that, light energy is absorbed by particular target chromophore and then converted to heat energy, which causes damage to the specific target area.[9] As IPL systems deliver many wavelengths (500-1300 nm), with aid of a cut-off filter, a targeted wavelength can be produced. Significant light absorption by oxy-haemoglobin occurs in the range of yellow and green light; with peak absorption at 418 nm, 542 nm, and 577 nm; maximum absorption by collagen occurs in visible and near infrared spectra.[14] Thus, mono-chromaticity is not a requirement for these chromophores to get activated to cause photothermolysis of target tissue. As IPL emits a spectrum of wavelengths, the key chromophores can be activated with one single pulse.[13] In clinical practice, currently IPL therapy is used to treat a number of decreases like unwanted hair removal, to treat vascular lesions, pigmented lesions, acne vulgaris, and to rejuvenate skin.[13] In facial rejuvenation IPL is used as non-ablative resurfacing technique, where it targets the dermis without affecting the epidermis. Though the exact mechanism is unknown,[13] such laser-induced remodelling may be associated with evidence of new dermal collagen formation. A study by Goldberg showed histologic evidence of new upper papillary dermal collagen formation. He concluded that dermal remodelling with an IPL source can lead to histologic evidence of new collagen formation with associated clinical improvement.[15] Recently Feng et al., histologically examined the pre- and post-IPL rejuvenated skin. They found increased activity of fibroblasts; increased type-I and type-III collagens; and decreased elastin content, though the elastin fibres get neatly re-arranged, thus, there was a morphological evidence of clinical improvement.[16] The IPL today is also the mostly employed in treatment of variety vascular malformations and haemangiomas, such as, port-wine stains, rosacea, telangiectasia etc.[13] Here the IPL targeted on the chromophore oxyhaemoglobin, which is abundant in the blood vessels. When activated, by IPL it causes photocoagulation of vascular endothelium, leading to fibrosis and obliteration of the blood vessels,[17] thus ensureing improvement of the clinical condition. Regarding burn scar management by laser, 585 nm PDL is used for last 10 years, and showed good result,[567] but there are very few result showing effect of IPL on burn scar,[9] especially in immature burn scar. As the immature burn scar has lot of collagen and it is hyper vascular, so, theoretically there is a great scope to control the collagen metabolism and decrease the blood vessels by treating it with IPL and to give a better appearance of the burn scar. In our study, we have shown that there was a significant (P < 0.05) decrease of scar vascularity and significant improvement of pliability of scar and it had become flat after treatment with IPL. These were probably because IPL caused coagulation necrosis of the blood vescle and it may hasten the collagen metabolism as described above.[151617]

CONCLUSIONS

IPL causes early decrease of scar vascularity and flattening of scar (reduction of height); it also increases pliability of immature burn scar and thus prevents development of hypertrophic scar. Further studies with increased sample size and longer periods of follow upalong with histological and biochemical analysis of pre- and post-treatment scar is required to evaluate the role of IPL on immature burn scars.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Intense pulsed light (IPL): a review.

Authors:  Philipp Babilas; Stephan Schreml; Rolf-Markus Szeimies; Michael Landthaler
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.025

2.  Rating the burn scar.

Authors:  T Sullivan; J Smith; J Kermode; E McIver; D J Courtemanche
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1990 May-Jun

3.  Treatment of hypertrophic scars using a long-pulsed dye laser with cryogen-spray cooling.

Authors:  Taro Kono; Ali Rza Erçöçen; Hiroaki Nakazawa; Motohiro Nozaki
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 4.  Pulsed dye laser in burn scars: current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  Brian M Parrett; Matthias B Donelan
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 2.744

5.  Assessment with the dermal torque meter of skin pliability after treatment of burns with cultured skin substitutes.

Authors:  S T Boyce; A P Supp; R R Wickett; S B Hoath; G D Warden
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

6.  Skin rejuvenation in Asian skin: the analysis of clinical effects and basic mechanisms of intense pulsed light.

Authors:  Yujie Feng; Junying Zhao; Michael H Gold
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.114

Review 7.  [Laser and intense pulsed light in the treatment of infantile haemangiomas and vascular malformations].

Authors:  I Sánchez Carpintero; M C Mihm; M Waner
Journal:  An Sist Sanit Navar       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 0.829

8.  Post-burn scars and scar contractures.

Authors:  Arun Goel; Prabhat Shrivastava
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2010-09

9.  Shine on: Review of Laser- and Light-Based Therapies for the Treatment of Burn Scars.

Authors:  C Scott Hultman; Renee E Edkins; Clara N Lee; Catherine T Calvert; Bruce A Cairns
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-20

10.  Decadorial of a burn center in Central India.

Authors:  Jayanta Bain; Shyam Lal; Vijay Singh Baghel; Vinod Yedalwar; Rachna Gupta; Anil Kumar Singh
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.