| Literature DB >> 25592966 |
Thomas Holm1, Cibin T Raghavan2,3, Rooban Nahomi4,5, Ram H Nagaraj6,7, Line Kessel8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cataract is the leading cause of blindness, especially in the developing world. To ease access to treatment, we have proposed that cataract could be treated non-invasively by photobleaching of the chemically modified proteins responsible for cataract formation. The present study was aimed at examining the optical and biochemical effects of the proposed treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25592966 PMCID: PMC4302587 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-0977-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Figure 1Photographs of two pairs of human donor lenses aged 74 years (upper panel) and 54 years (lower panel). The untreated, control lens is shown on the left side of the photograh. The treated lens is shown on the right side of the photograph. The treated lenses were photobleached in a 4x10 mm horisontal area covering the central part of the lens.
Transmission before and after photobleaching
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control lens | 0.70 ± 0.11 (0.48-0.84) | 0.45 ± 0.15 (0.19-0.67) | ||
| Treated lens, before treatment | 0.71 ± 0.09 (0.57-0.85) | 0.45 ± 0.14 (0.22-0.67) | 0.47 | 0.62 |
| Treated lens, after treatment | 0.76 ± 0.08 (0.64-0.89) | 0.54 ± 0.13 (0.33-0.75) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD (range). For the paired t-test, the treated lens before treatment was compared to the control lens whereas the treated lens after treatment was compared to the same lens before treatment.
Figure 2Transmission characteristics in untreated lenses and in lenses before and after photobleaching. The graph shows the mean spectral transmission characteristics for all lenses included in the experiments as control lenses (untreated, n = 15) and all the photobleached lenses (n = 15) before and after the photobleaching procedure.
Figure 3Scattering was measured as the angular intensity profile of forward scattered light using a red laser light source. The graph shows the mean of all control lenses and the mean of the lenses before and after photobleaching. The scattering profile of the red laser through a cuvette filled with castor oil is shown for comparison. The scale on the y-axis is logarithmic.
Concentration of advanced glycation end products in control lenses and treated lenses
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control lens | 1.10 (0.22) | 0.15 (0.04) | 0.04 (0.02) | 3.76 (3.89) |
| Treated lens | 1.19 (0.46) | 0.15 (0.04) | 0.04 (0.02) | 2.25 (1.53) |
| Signed rank sum test (p-value) | 0.06 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.38 |
Concentration of advanced glycation end products in control lenses and treated lenses. CML: carboxymethyllysine. HI: hydroimidazolone. CML and HI were measured by ELISA and pentosidine and argpyrimidine were measured by fluorescence HPLC . *Absorbance units. **pmol/μmole amino acid. N denotes number of lens pairs.
Figure 4Box plot (lower 25 percentile, median and upper 75 percentile) of fluorescence measurements in control lenses and lenses treated with photobleaching. Fluorescence was measured for argpyrimidine and pentosidine-like AGEs (λem/λex 335/385 nm) and for other AGEs (λem/λex 370/440 nm).