Literature DB >> 25592627

How clinical trials of myasthenia gravis can inform pre-clinical drug development.

Anna Rostedt Punga1, Henry J Kaminski2, David P Richman3, Michael Benatar4.   

Abstract

Pre-clinical evaluations often provide the rationale for therapeutic assessments in humans; however, in many diseases an agent found successful in animal models does not show efficacy in human subjects. Our contention is that the approach of rigorous, clinical trials can be used to inform how preclinical assessments should be performed. Clinical trials in humans are carefully designed investigations executed with consideration of critical methodological issues, such as pre-specified entrance criteria and validated, outcome measures coupled with power analysis to identify sample size. Blinding of evaluators of subjective measures and randomization of subjects are also critical aspects of trial performance. Investigative agents are also tested in subjects with active disease, rather than prior to disease induction as in some pre-clinical assessments. Application of standard procedures, including uniform reporting standards, would likely assist in reproducibility of pre-clinical experiments. Adapting methods of clinical trial performance will likely improve the success rate of therapeutics to ultimately achieve human use.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal models; Clinical trials; Myasthenia gravis; Preclinical assessment; Therapeutic development

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25592627      PMCID: PMC4466144          DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  21 in total

Review 1.  Animal models of myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  P Christadoss; M Poussin; C Deng
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 2.  The Biomarker-Surrogacy Evaluation Schema: a review of the biomarker-surrogate literature and a proposal for a criterion-based, quantitative, multidimensional hierarchical levels of evidence schema for evaluating the status of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints.

Authors:  Marissa N Lassere
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Age- and sex-related resistance to chronic experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis (EAMG) in Brown Norway rats.

Authors:  A Hoedemaekers; Y Graus; P van Breda Vriesman; M de Baets
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Spontaneous remission in canine myasthenia gravis: implications for assessing human MG therapies.

Authors:  G D Shelton; J M Lindstrom
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America.

Authors:  A Jaretzki; R J Barohn; R M Ernstoff; H J Kaminski; J C Keesey; A S Penn; D B Sanders
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-07-12       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Lost in translation: treatment trials in the SOD1 mouse and in human ALS.

Authors:  Michael Benatar
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 5.996

7.  Design, power, and interpretation of studies in the standard murine model of ALS.

Authors:  Sean Scott; Janice E Kranz; Jeff Cole; John M Lincecum; Kenneth Thompson; Nancy Kelly; Alan Bostrom; Jill Theodoss; Bashar M Al-Nakhala; Fernando G Vieira; Jeyanthi Ramasubbu; James A Heywood
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler       Date:  2008

8.  Mechanisms by which the I-ABM12 mutation influences susceptibility to experimental myasthenia gravis: a study in homozygous and heterozygous mice.

Authors:  P I Karachunski; N Ostlie; M Bellone; A J Infante; B M Conti-Fine
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.487

9.  Anti-C5 antibody treatment ameliorates weakness in experimentally acquired myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  Yuefang Zhou; Bendi Gong; Feng Lin; Russell P Rother; M Edward Medof; Henry J Kaminski
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: how and when might they impact drug development?

Authors:  Chetan D Lathia
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.434

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacotherapy of Generalized Myasthenia Gravis with Special Emphasis on Newer Biologicals.

Authors:  Deepak Menon; Vera Bril
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 11.431

2.  Systematic review of guidelines for internal validity in the design, conduct and analysis of preclinical biomedical experiments involving laboratory animals.

Authors:  Jan Vollert; Esther Schenker; Malcolm Macleod; Anton Bespalov; Hanno Wuerbel; Martin Michel; Ulrich Dirnagl; Heidrun Potschka; Ann-Marie Waldron; Kimberley Wever; Thomas Steckler; Tom van de Casteele; Bruce Altevogt; Annesha Sil; Andrew S C Rice
Journal:  BMJ Open Sci       Date:  2020-04-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.