Karen B Eden1, Annette M Totten2, Steven Z Kassakian2, Paul N Gorman3, Marian S McDonagh2, Beth Devine4, Miranda Pappas2, Monica Daeges2, Susan Woods5, William R Hersh3. 1. Pacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA. Electronic address: edenk@ohsu.edu. 2. Pacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 3. Pacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 4. Pacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA; University of Washington, Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Box 357630, Seattle, WA 98195-7630, USA. 5. Pacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Veterans Affairs Maine Healthcare System, 1 VA Center, Augusta, ME 04330, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing facilitators and barriers to use of health information exchange (HIE). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases between January 1990 and February 2015 using terms related to HIE. English-language studies that identified barriers and facilitators of actual HIE were included. Data on study design, risk of bias, setting, geographic location, characteristics of the HIE, perceived barriers and facilitators to use were extracted and confirmed. RESULTS: Ten cross-sectional, seven multiple-site case studies, and two before-after studies that included data from several sources (surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observations of users) evaluated perceived barriers and facilitators to HIE use. The most commonly cited barriers to HIE use were incomplete information, inefficient workflow, and reports that the exchanged information that did not meet the needs of users. The review identified several facilitators to use. DISCUSSION: Incomplete patient information was consistently mentioned in the studies conducted in the US but not mentioned in the few studies conducted outside of the US that take a collective approach toward healthcare. Individual patients and practices in the US may exercise the right to participate (or not) in HIE which effects the completeness of patient information available to be exchanged. Workflow structure and user roles are key but understudied. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several facilitators in the studies that showed promise in promoting electronic health data exchange: obtaining more complete patient information; thoughtful workflow that folds in HIE; and inclusion of users early in implementation.
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing facilitators and barriers to use of health information exchange (HIE). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases between January 1990 and February 2015 using terms related to HIE. English-language studies that identified barriers and facilitators of actual HIE were included. Data on study design, risk of bias, setting, geographic location, characteristics of the HIE, perceived barriers and facilitators to use were extracted and confirmed. RESULTS: Ten cross-sectional, seven multiple-site case studies, and two before-after studies that included data from several sources (surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observations of users) evaluated perceived barriers and facilitators to HIE use. The most commonly cited barriers to HIE use were incomplete information, inefficient workflow, and reports that the exchanged information that did not meet the needs of users. The review identified several facilitators to use. DISCUSSION: Incomplete patient information was consistently mentioned in the studies conducted in the US but not mentioned in the few studies conducted outside of the US that take a collective approach toward healthcare. Individual patients and practices in the US may exercise the right to participate (or not) in HIE which effects the completeness of patient information available to be exchanged. Workflow structure and user roles are key but understudied. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several facilitators in the studies that showed promise in promoting electronic health data exchange: obtaining more complete patient information; thoughtful workflow that folds in HIE; and inclusion of users early in implementation.
Authors: Kevin B Johnson; Cindy S Gadd; Dominik Aronsky; Kevin Yang; Lianhong Tang; Vicki Estrin; Janet K King; Mark Frisse Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2008-11-06
Authors: Omar Bouhaddou; Jamie Bennett; Tim Cromwell; Graham Nixon; Jennifer Teal; Mike Davis; Robert Smith; Linda Fischetti; David Parker; Zachary Gillen; John Mattison Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2011-10-22
Authors: Matthew Massy-Westropp; Lynne C Giles; Deborah Law; Paddy A Phillips; Maria Crotty Journal: Aust Health Rev Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Samantha I Pitts; Nisa M Maruthur; Xiao Wang; Melinda D Sawyer; Renee Grimes; Candace Nigrin; Jeanne M Clark; Nae-Yuh Wang; Heather F Sateia; Kimberly S Peairs Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Emily Gill; Patricia C Dykes; Robert S Rudin; Marianne Storm; Kelly McGrath; David W Bates Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Mindy K Ross; Javier Sanz; Brian Tep; Rob Follett; Spencer L Soohoo; Douglas S Bell Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Francesc Saigí-Rubió; José Juan Pereyra-Rodríguez; Joan Torrent-Sellens; Hans Eguia; Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat; David Novillo-Ortiz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Emily Beth Devine; Annette M Totten; Paul Gorman; Karen B Eden; Steven Kassakian; Susan Woods; Monica Daeges; Miranda Pappas; Marian McDonagh; William R Hersh Journal: EGEMS (Wash DC) Date: 2017-12-07