Literature DB >> 10737398

The oculomotor distractor effect in normal and hemianopic vision.

R Walker1, S Mannan, D Maurer, A L Pambakian, C Kennard.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the inhibitory effect of visual distractors on the latency of saccades made by hemianopic and normal human subjects. The latency of saccades made by hemianopic subjects to stimuli in their intact visual field was not affected by visual distractors presented within their hemianopic field. In contrast, the latency of saccades made by normal subjects was increased significantly under distractor conditions. The latency increase was larger for temporal than nasal distractors. The results are inconsistent with previous proposals that the crossed retinotectal pathway from the nasal hemiretina to the superior colliculus may mediate a blindsight inhibitory effect when distractors appear within a hemianopic temporal visual field. Instead, the distractor effect appears to reflect the normal processes involved in saccade target selection which may be mediated by a circuit involving both cortical and subcortical structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10737398      PMCID: PMC1690554          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  30 in total

1.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina.

Authors:  C A Curcio; K A Allen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-10-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 2.  The deep layers of the superior colliculus.

Authors:  D L Sparks; R Hartwich-Young
Journal:  Rev Oculomot Res       Date:  1989

Review 3.  The visual superior colliculus and pulvinar.

Authors:  D L Robinson; J W McClurkin
Journal:  Rev Oculomot Res       Date:  1989

4.  Structure-function relationships in the primate superior colliculus. II. Morphological identity of presaccadic neurons.

Authors:  A K Moschovakis; A B Karabelas; S M Highstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Independent contributions of the orienting of attention, fixation offset and bilateral stimulation on human saccadic latencies.

Authors:  R Walker; R W Kentridge; J M Findlay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Nasal and temporal retinal ganglion cells projecting to the midbrain: implications for "blindsight".

Authors:  C Williams; P Azzopardi; A Cowey
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. II. Reversible activation and deactivation.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effectiveness of different task paradigms in revealing blindsight.

Authors:  M Corbetta; C A Marzi; G Tassinari; S Aglioti
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Possible blindsight in infants lacking one cerebral hemisphere.

Authors:  O Braddick; J Atkinson; B Hood; W Harkness; G Jackson; F Vargha-Khadem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-12-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  13 in total

1.  Extrageniculate mediation of unconscious vision in transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced blindsight.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Dominique Shelton; Olivia L Lee; Erik Chang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Saccade performance in the nasal and temporal hemifields.

Authors:  Omar I Jóhannesson; Arni Gunnar Asgeirsson; Arni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  More GABA, less distraction: a neurochemical predictor of motor decision speed.

Authors:  Petroc Sumner; Richard A E Edden; Aline Bompas; C John Evans; Krish D Singh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Naso-temporal asymmetry for signals invisible to the retinotectal pathway.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Thomas Sterling; Robert D Rafal; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Nasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors.

Authors:  Christoph Huber-Huber; Anna Grubert; Ulrich Ansorge; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Violating the main sequence: asymmetries in saccadic peak velocities for saccades into the temporal versus nasal hemifields.

Authors:  Omar I Jóhannesson; Arni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of saccade training on express saccade proportions, saccade latencies, and peak velocities: an investigation of nasal/temporal differences.

Authors:  Ómar I Jóhannesson; Jay A Edelman; Bjarki Dalsgaard Sigurþórsson; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cognitive control and automatic interference in mind and brain: A unified model of saccadic inhibition and countermanding.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Anne Eileen Campbell; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Characteristics of contralesional and ipsilesional saccades in hemianopic patients.

Authors:  Alexandra Fayel; Sylvie Chokron; Céline Cavézian; Dorine Vergilino-Perez; Christelle Lemoine; Karine Doré-Mazars
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Evidence that indirect inhibition of saccade initiation improves saccade acuracy.

Authors:  Eugene McSorley; Alice G Cruickshank
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2010-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.