Margarita S Dodevska1, Sladjana S Sobajic2, Predrag B Djordjevic3, Vesna S Dimitrijevic-Sreckovic3, Vesna V Spasojevic-Kalimanovska4, Brizita I Djordjevic2. 1. Department of Bromatology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. margarit_bromi@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Bromatology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. 3. Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. 4. Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Starting from the evidence-based health benefits that resistant starch (RS) shows when added to the diet, our aim in this study was to evaluate the effects of increased fibre intake with two different levels of RS coming from regular daily consumed foods on normalization of glycaemia within lifestyle intervention in the population with risk factors for developing diabetes. METHODS: Study included 47 overweight and obese men and women with disordered glucoregulation and dyslipidaemia, aged between 45-74, divided into RS and Fibre group. Participants were subjected to the lifestyle and dietary intervention with low-fat and high-fibre (>25 g/day) diet for 12 months and were offered two different dietary advices aimed at increasing total fibre intake in Fibre group and at increasing RS intake in RS group. RESULTS: The intake of macronutrients and total fibre was similar between groups at the end of the study, but achieved RS intake was two times higher in the RS group. Decrease in total cholesterol and non-HDL-cholesterol was more pronounced in RS group in comparison with Fibre group (p = 0.010, p = 0.031, respectively), whereas in Fibre group, a more pronounced effect on glucoregulation was observed: significant fall in glycaemia after 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (7.93 vs 6.96 mmol/L, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: At the end of the study, RS-rich diet failed to affect glycaemic control in prediabetic obese individuals in contrast to the regular fibre-rich diet, which indicated that fibre profile could be an important determinant of the effect of dietary intervention.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Starting from the evidence-based health benefits that resistant starch (RS) shows when added to the diet, our aim in this study was to evaluate the effects of increased fibre intake with two different levels of RS coming from regular daily consumed foods on normalization of glycaemia within lifestyle intervention in the population with risk factors for developing diabetes. METHODS: Study included 47 overweight and obesemen and women with disordered glucoregulation and dyslipidaemia, aged between 45-74, divided into RS and Fibre group. Participants were subjected to the lifestyle and dietary intervention with low-fat and high-fibre (>25 g/day) diet for 12 months and were offered two different dietary advices aimed at increasing total fibre intake in Fibre group and at increasing RS intake in RS group. RESULTS: The intake of macronutrients and total fibre was similar between groups at the end of the study, but achieved RS intake was two times higher in the RS group. Decrease in total cholesterol and non-HDL-cholesterol was more pronounced in RS group in comparison with Fibre group (p = 0.010, p = 0.031, respectively), whereas in Fibre group, a more pronounced effect on glucoregulation was observed: significant fall in glycaemia after 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (7.93 vs 6.96 mmol/L, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: At the end of the study, RS-rich diet failed to affect glycaemic control in prediabetic obese individuals in contrast to the regular fibre-rich diet, which indicated that fibre profile could be an important determinant of the effect of dietary intervention.
Authors: X R Pan; G W Li; Y H Hu; J X Wang; W Y Yang; Z X An; Z X Hu; J Lin; J Z Xiao; H B Cao; P A Liu; X G Jiang; Y Y Jiang; J P Wang; H Zheng; H Zhang; P H Bennett; B V Howard Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Linda Penn; Martin White; John Oldroyd; Mark Walker; K George M M Alberti; John C Mathers Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Laure B Bindels; Rafael R Segura Munoz; João Carlos Gomes-Neto; Valentin Mutemberezi; Inés Martínez; Nuria Salazar; Elizabeth A Cody; Maria I Quintero-Villegas; Hatem Kittana; Clara G de Los Reyes-Gavilán; Robert J Schmaltz; Giulio G Muccioli; Jens Walter; Amanda E Ramer-Tait Journal: Microbiome Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Zahra Lotfollahi; Ana Paula de Queiroz Mello; Edna S Costa; Cristiano L P Oliveira; Nagila R T Damasceno; Maria Cristina Izar; Antonio Martins Figueiredo Neto Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Michelle J Alfa; David Strang; Paramjit S Tappia; Nancy Olson; Pat DeGagne; David Bray; Brenda-Lee Murray; Brett Hiebert Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2018-01-22