Literature DB >> 25588827

Actual versus theoretical torsional play in conventional and self-ligating bracket systems.

Michel Dalstra, Henrik Eriksen, Chiara Bergamini, Birte Melsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the amount of torsional play in 32 commercially available self-ligating and conventional 0·018-inch and 0·022-inch bracket systems in relation to 0·017×0·022-inch and 0·019×0·025-inch stainless steel wires, respectively, and compare the results with the theoretical amount of play for the given bracket/wire combinations.
METHODS: Torque moments were measured in a mechanical force testing system by twisting straight pieces of stainless steel wire seated in the bracket slot in increments of 0·5° until a full torsional expression was registered. Five upper central incisor brackets from each of the 32 different bracket systems were selected for the study.
RESULTS: The result from the laboratory testing clearly showed that wire/slot play was larger than anticipated from the nominal values, especially regarding the 0·022-inch brackets and particularly in relation to the passive self-ligating brackets. The play ranged from 19·8 to 36·1° of play for the most imprecise bracket system.
CONCLUSIONS: The result does not favour the use of self-ligating brackets when focussing on torque control. The actual play is larger due to oversized slots and the inability of self-ligation brackets to press the archwire into the bottom of the slot. In conventional brackets, the initial torque moment is generated by the steel ligatures pressing the arch wire against the bottom of the slot. The oversize of the slot is thus less critical in relation to the conventional than in relation to the passive self-ligation bracket.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthodontic brackets,; torque expression,; torsional play

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25588827     DOI: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthod        ISSN: 1465-3125


  11 in total

1.  Root resorption due to orthodontic treatment using self-ligating and conventional brackets : A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Isil Aras; Idil Unal; Gencer Huniler; Aynur Aras
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Novel methods reveal that parallelism contributes to the functional vertical slot dimension in ceramic and metal brackets.

Authors:  Matthew Silver; Alfred C Griffin; Lauren Azzopardi; Mohammed I Masoud; Oluwabunmi Tokede; Alfred C Griffin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials : In vitro analysis.

Authors:  Lutz Hodecker; Christoph Bourauel; Bert Braumann; Teresa Kruse; Hildegard Christ; Sven Scharf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 4.  Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hisham Sabbagh; Yeganeh Khazaei; Uwe Baumert; Lea Hoffmann; Andrea Wichelhaus; Mila Janjic Rankovic
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Accuracy evaluation of bracket repositioning by indirect bonding: hard acrylic CAD/CAM versus soft one-layer silicone trays, an in vitro study.

Authors:  Thomas Pottier; Antoine Brient; Yann Loïg Turpin; Brice Chauvel; Vincent Meuric; Olivier Sorel; Damien Brezulier
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Torque expression in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Thomali; Roshan-Noor Mohamed; Sakeenabi Basha
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-01-01

7.  Controlling incisor torque with completely customized lingual appliances.

Authors:  Ons Alouini; Michael Knösel; Moritz Blanck-Lubarsch; Hans-Joachim Helms; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Variability of slot size in orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Clémentine Lefebvre; Hassan Saadaoui; Jean-Marc Olive; Stéphane Renaudin; Fabienne Jordana
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2019-07-11

9.  Dimensional variability of orthodontic slots and archwires: an analysis of torque expression and clinical implications.

Authors:  Michele Tepedino; Giordano Paiella; Maciej Iancu Potrubacz; Annalisa Monaco; Roberto Gatto; Claudio Chimenti
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?

Authors:  Laura Bernés Martínez; Daniele Garcovich; Pilar España Pamplona; Milagros Adobes Adobes Martín; Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.