Suresh B Lakshminarayana1, Tan Bee Huat1, Paul C Ho2, Ujjini H Manjunatha1, Véronique Dartois3, Thomas Dick4, Srinivasa P S Rao1. 1. Novartis Institute for Tropical Diseases, Singapore. 2. Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 3. Novartis Institute for Tropical Diseases, Singapore veronique.dartois@rutgers.edu. 4. Novartis Institute for Tropical Diseases, Singapore Department of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The discovery and development of TB drugs has met limited success, with two new drugs approved over the last 40 years. Part of the difficulty resides in the lack of well-established in vitro or in vivo targets of potency and physicochemical and pharmacokinetic parameters. In an attempt to benchmark and compare such properties for anti-TB agents, we have experimentally determined and compiled these parameters for 36 anti-TB compounds, using standardized and centralized assays, thus ensuring direct comparability across drugs and drug classes. METHODS: Potency parameters included growth inhibition, cidal activity against growing and non-growing bacteria and activity against intracellular mycobacteria. Pharmacokinetic parameters included basic physicochemical properties, solubility, permeability and metabolic stability. We then attempted to establish correlations between physicochemical, in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic indices to tentatively inform future drug discovery efforts. RESULTS: Two-thirds of the compounds tested showed bactericidal and intramacrophage activity. Most compounds exhibited favourable solubility, permeability and metabolic stability in standard in vitro pharmacokinetic assays. An analysis of human pharmacokinetic parameters revealed associations between lipophilicity and volume of distribution, clearance, plasma protein binding and oral bioavailability. Not surprisingly, most compounds with favourable pharmacokinetic properties complied with Lipinski's rule of five. CONCLUSIONS: However, most attempts to detect in vitro-in vivo correlations were unsuccessful, emphasizing the challenges of anti-TB drug discovery. The objective of this work is to provide a reference dataset for the TB drug discovery community with a focus on comparative in vitro potency and pharmacokinetics.
OBJECTIVES: The discovery and development of TB drugs has met limited success, with two new drugs approved over the last 40 years. Part of the difficulty resides in the lack of well-established in vitro or in vivo targets of potency and physicochemical and pharmacokinetic parameters. In an attempt to benchmark and compare such properties for anti-TB agents, we have experimentally determined and compiled these parameters for 36 anti-TB compounds, using standardized and centralized assays, thus ensuring direct comparability across drugs and drug classes. METHODS: Potency parameters included growth inhibition, cidal activity against growing and non-growing bacteria and activity against intracellular mycobacteria. Pharmacokinetic parameters included basic physicochemical properties, solubility, permeability and metabolic stability. We then attempted to establish correlations between physicochemical, in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic indices to tentatively inform future drug discovery efforts. RESULTS: Two-thirds of the compounds tested showed bactericidal and intramacrophage activity. Most compounds exhibited favourable solubility, permeability and metabolic stability in standard in vitro pharmacokinetic assays. An analysis of human pharmacokinetic parameters revealed associations between lipophilicity and volume of distribution, clearance, plasma protein binding and oral bioavailability. Not surprisingly, most compounds with favourable pharmacokinetic properties complied with Lipinski's rule of five. CONCLUSIONS: However, most attempts to detect in vitro-in vivo correlations were unsuccessful, emphasizing the challenges of anti-TB drug discovery. The objective of this work is to provide a reference dataset for the TB drug discovery community with a focus on comparative in vitro potency and pharmacokinetics.
Authors: Kathleen England; Helena I M Boshoff; Kriti Arora; Danielle Weiner; Emmanuel Dayao; Daniel Schimel; Laura E Via; Clifton E Barry Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Daniel F Veber; Stephen R Johnson; Hung-Yuan Cheng; Brian R Smith; Keith W Ward; Kenneth D Kopple Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2002-06-06 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Alexander L Perryman; Jimmy S Patel; Riccardo Russo; Eric Singleton; Nancy Connell; Sean Ekins; Joel S Freundlich Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: M Tobias Heinrichs; Sergo Vashakidze; Ketino Nikolaishvili; Irina Sabulua; Nestani Tukvadze; Nino Bablishvili; Shota Gogishvili; Brent P Little; Adam Bernheim; Jeannette Guarner; Charles A Peloquin; Henry M Blumberg; Hartmut Derendorf; Russell R Kempker Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Kei Katsuno; Jeremy N Burrows; Ken Duncan; Rob Hooft van Huijsduijnen; Takushi Kaneko; Kiyoshi Kita; Charles E Mowbray; Dennis Schmatz; Peter Warner; B T Slingsby Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Thomas P Stratton; Alexander L Perryman; Catherine Vilchèze; Riccardo Russo; Shao-Gang Li; Jimmy S Patel; Eric Singleton; Sean Ekins; Nancy Connell; William R Jacobs; Joel S Freundlich Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 4.345