Literature DB >> 25587704

Intracortical recording interfaces: current challenges to chronic recording function.

Bhagya Gunasekera1, Tarun Saxena, Ravi Bellamkonda, Lohitash Karumbaiah.   

Abstract

Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) offer significant hope to tetraplegic and paraplegic individuals. This technology relies on extracting and translating motor intent to facilitate control of a computer cursor or to enable fine control of an external assistive device such as a prosthetic limb. Intracortical recording interfaces (IRIs) are critical components of BCIs and consist of arrays of penetrating electrodes that are implanted into the motor cortex of the brain. These multielectrode arrays (MEAs) are responsible for recording and conducting neural signals from local ensembles of neurons in the motor cortex with the high speed and spatiotemporal resolution that is required for exercising control of external assistive prostheses. Recent design and technological innovations in the field have led to significant improvements in BCI function. However, long-term (chronic) BCI function is severely compromised by short-term (acute) IRI recording failure. In this review, we will discuss the design and function of current IRIs. We will also review a host of recent advances that contribute significantly to our overall understanding of the cellular and molecular events that lead to acute recording failure of these invasive implants. We will also present recent improvements to IRI design and provide insights into the futuristic design of more chronically functional IRIs.

Keywords:  Brain computer interfaces; foreign body response; intracortical neural interfaces

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25587704     DOI: 10.1021/cn5002864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci        ISSN: 1948-7193            Impact factor:   4.418


  27 in total

1.  A Materials Roadmap to Functional Neural Interface Design.

Authors:  Steven M Wellman; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; John P Seymour; Nicholas J Michelson; William E McFadden; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 18.808

2.  Unique electrophysiological and impedance signatures between encapsulation types: An analysis of biological Utah array failure and benefit of a biomimetic coating in a rat model.

Authors:  Patrick A Cody; James R Eles; Carl F Lagenaur; Takashi D Y Kozai; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Rodent Behavioral Testing to Assess Functional Deficits Caused by Microelectrode Implantation in the Rat Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Monika Goss-Varley; Andrew J Shoffstall; Keith R Dona; Justin A McMahon; Sydney C Lindner; Evon S Ereifej; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Microelectrode implants, inflammatory response and long-lasting effects on NADPH diaphorase neurons in the rat frontal cortex.

Authors:  Joanilson S Guimaraes; Nelson Alessandretti M Lemos; Marco Aurelio M Freire; Antonio Pereira; Sidarta Ribeiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 5.  The Evolution of Neuroprosthetic Interfaces.

Authors:  Dayo O Adewole; Mijail D Serruya; James P Harris; Justin C Burrell; Dmitriy Petrov; H Isaac Chen; John A Wolf; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2016

6.  Neuronal excitability and network formation on optically transparent electrode materials.

Authors:  Cort H Thompson; Sahar A Khan; Wasif A Khan; Wen Li; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08-15

Review 7.  Mechanical and Biological Interactions of Implants with the Brain and Their Impact on Implant Design.

Authors:  Dimiter Prodanov; Jean Delbeke
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 8.  Gels, jets, mosquitoes, and magnets: a review of implantation strategies for soft neural probes.

Authors:  Nicholas V Apollo; Brendan Murphy; Kayla Prezelski; Nicolette Driscoll; Andrew G Richardson; Timothy H Lucas; Flavia Vitale
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  PEDOT:PSS Interfaces Support the Development of Neuronal Synaptic Networks with Reduced Neuroglia Response In vitro.

Authors:  Giada Cellot; Paola Lagonegro; Giuseppe Tarabella; Denis Scaini; Filippo Fabbri; Salvatore Iannotta; Maurizio Prato; Giancarlo Salviati; Laura Ballerini
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Invasive vs. Non-Invasive Neuronal Signals for Brain-Machine Interfaces: Will One Prevail?

Authors:  Stephan Waldert
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.