| Literature DB >> 25587344 |
Ling Guan1, Jean-Paul Collet1, Nataliya Yuskiv1, Peter Skippen2, Rollin Brant3, Niranjan Kissoon4.
Abstract
Objectives. Our main objective was to describe the effect of foot and hand (F&H) massage on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity in children hospitalized in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU); the secondary objectives were to assess the relationship between ANS function and the clinical severity and to explore the effects of repeated massage sessions on the ANS. Methods. Design was a descriptive experimental study. Intervention was single or six session(s) of F&H massage. ANS function was assessed through the frequency-domain analysis of heart rate variability. Main metrics included high and low frequency power (HF and LF), HF + LF, and LF/HF ratio. Results. Eighteen children participated in the study. A strong Spearman's correlation (ρ = -0.77) was observed between HF + LF and clinical severity. During massage, the parasympathetic activity (measured by HF) increased significantly from baseline (P = 0.04) with a mean percentage increase of 75% (95% CI: 20%∼130%). LF increased by 56% (95% CI: 20%∼92%) (P = 0.026). Repeated sessions were associated with a persistent effect on HF and LF which peaked at the second session and remained stable thereafter. Conclusions. HF + LF is positively correlated with clinical severity. F&H massage can improve the ANS activity and the effect persists when repeated sessions are offered.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25587344 PMCID: PMC4283436 DOI: 10.1155/2014/656750
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Heart rate variability for critically ill children compared with normal values from the literature [26–28].
| Age of the 18 PICU subjects | HF of PICU subjects, ms2/Hz | HF normal range, ms2/Hz [ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | ||
| 2 months ( | 2.6 | 25.03 | 2.36 |
| 5 months ( | 22.4 | 25.03 | 2.36 |
| 8 months ( | 28.3 | 36.6 | 3.03 |
| 10 months ( | 25.9 | 36.6 | 3.03 |
| 2.5 years ( | 106.5 | 407.48 | 3.56 |
| 5 years ( | 0.04 | 398 | 377 |
| 6 years ( | 0.13 | 398 | 377 |
| 8 years ( | 8.35 | 469 | 275 |
| 12 years ( | 0.07 | 285.5 | 272 |
| 14 years ( | 9.17 | 285.5 | 272 |
| 17 years ( | 0.36 | 285.5 | 272 |
PICU: pediatric intensive care unit; HF: high frequency.
Figure 1Study recruitment flow chart.
Heart rate variability and pediatric logistic organ dysfunction scores.
| HF + LF, ms2/Hz | Age | Gender | Diagnosis (subject number) | PELOD scores | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >100 | 700.98 | 2.5 y | F | Pneumonia, respiratory distress | 0 |
| 534.14 | 2.5 y | M | Postoperation (frontal lobe tumor) | 0 | |
| 233.88 | 2.5 y | M | Pneumonia, respiratory distress | 0 | |
| 222 | 8 m | M | RSV bronchiolitis | 0 | |
|
| |||||
| 10–100 | 68.44 | 5 m | M | Stridor | 0 |
| 64.78 | 2.5 y | M | Pneumonia | 0 | |
| 56.2 | 8 y | M | Pectus excavatum repair | 0 | |
| 46.21 | 10 m | M | Respiratory infection, congenital heart disease | 0 | |
| 42.01 | 8 m | M | Pulmonary hypoplasia plus upper gastrointestinal bleeding | 0 | |
| 32.23 | 2.5 y | F | Pneumonia | 0 | |
| 36.71 | 14 y | M | Burns | 0 | |
| 10.58 | 2 m | M | RSV bronchiolitis | 0 | |
|
| |||||
| 1–10 | 7.26 | 2.5 y | M | Trauma | 1 |
| 2.63 | 2.5 y | F | Status epilepticus | 0 | |
| 1.3 | 17 y | F | Sepsis shock, presumed pyelonephritis, and vesicoureteral reflux | 10 | |
|
| |||||
| <0.1 | 0.73 | 6 y | F | Acute renal failure, sepsis shock, and respiratory distress | 10 |
| 0.3 | 5 y | F | Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, septic shock | 20 | |
| 0.09 | 12 y | F | Acute myeloid leukemia, | 12 | |
PELOD scores: Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction scores; HF + LF: high and low frequency power of heart rate variability.
Figure 2Correlation between HF + LF values and clinical severity score in patients in pediatric intensive care unit. PELOD scores: Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction scores; HF + LF: high and low frequency power of heart rate variability. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient ρ = −0.77, 95% CI: −0.91, −0.47; P < 0.001. In the figure, HRV data (x-axis) have been logarithmically transformed (i.e., HRV data).
One-session massage effect on heart rate variability.
|
HRV values |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (B) | During massage (D) | After massage (A) | Repeated measures | Pairwise comparison | |||
| B~D | B~A | D~A | |||||
| lnHF | 1.63 (0.26 to 3.01) | 2.02 (0.65 to 3.39) | 1.69 (0.38 to 2.99) | 0.03 | 0.04 | 1 | 0.05 |
| lnLF | 2.44 (1.13 to 3.76) | 2.78 (1.5 to 4.07) | 2.59 (1.39 to 3.78) | 0.046 | 0.026 | 1 | 0.34 |
| Normalized HF, n.u. | 0.33 (0.23 to 0.44) | 0.33 (0.24 to 0.42) | 0.32 (0.22 to 0.43) | 0.9 | NA | NA | NA |
| Normalized LF, n.u. | 0.67 (0.56 to 0.77) | 0.67 (0.58 to 0.76) | 0.68 (0.57 to 0.78) | 0.9 | NA | NA | NA |
| LF/HF | 3.28 (1.98 to 4.59) | 3.34 (2.22 to 4.45) | 3.81 (2.1 to 5.52) | 0.54 | NA | NA | NA |
HRV: heart rate variability; HF: high frequency; LF: low frequency.
Normalized HF: HF/(HF + LF); normalized LF: LF/(HF + LF).
B (baseline): five minutes before massage; D (during massage): the mean of five-minute intervals during massage process; A (after massage): five minutes after massage.
Figure 3Individual percentage change of heart rate variability during massage. Mean percentage increase of HF during massage (significant): 75% (95% CI: 20% TO 130%). Mean percentage increase of LF during massage (significant): 56% (95% CI: 20% TO 92%).
Figure 4Heart rate variability changes during repeated massage sessions. lnHF: natural logarithm of the high frequency power; lnLF: natural logarithm of the low frequency power. Mean lnHF (with SE) at baseline and during six massage sessions: 0.63 (1.18), 1.51 (1.23), 2.21 (1.2), 1.7 (1.13), 1.67 (1.23), 1.59 (1.28), and 1.59 (1.22). Mean lnLF (with SE) at baseline and during six massage sessions: 1.24 (1.24), 1.84 (1.26), 2.39 (1.26), 2.1 (1.17), 2.33 (1.23), 2.32 (1.09), and 2.16 (1.19).