Mohammed Salim Al-Damluji1, Kristina Dzara1, Beth Hodshon1, Natdanai Punnanithinont1, Harlan M Krumholz1, Sarwat I Chaudhry1, Leora I Horwitz2. 1. From the Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (M.S.A.-D., K.D., S.I.C.), Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (B.H., H.M.K.), and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine (H.M.K.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Medicine, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, NY (N.P.); Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (H.M.K., S.I.C.); Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT (H.M.K.); Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, New York University Langone Medical Center (L.I.H.); and Division of Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health and Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine (L.I.H.). 2. From the Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (M.S.A.-D., K.D., S.I.C.), Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (B.H., H.M.K.), and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine (H.M.K.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Medicine, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, NY (N.P.); Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (H.M.K., S.I.C.); Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT (H.M.K.); Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, New York University Langone Medical Center (L.I.H.); and Division of Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health and Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine (L.I.H.). leora.horwitz@nyumc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Single-site studies have demonstrated inadequate quality of discharge summaries in timeliness, transmission, and content, potentially contributing to adverse outcomes. However, degree of hospital-level variation in discharge summary quality for patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed discharge summaries of patients enrolled in the Telemonitoring to Improve Heart Failure Outcomes (Tele-HF) study. We assessed hospital-level performance on timeliness (fraction of summaries completed on the day of discharge), documented transmission to the follow-up physician, and content (presence of components suggested by the Transitions of Care Consensus Conference). We obtained 1501 discharge summaries from 1640 (91.5%) patients discharged alive from 46 hospitals. Among hospitals contributing ≥ 10 summaries, the median hospital dictated 69.2% of discharge summaries on the day of discharge (range, 0.0%-98.0%; P<0.001); documented transmission of 33.3% of summaries to the follow-up physician (range, 0.0%-75.7%; P<0.001); and included 3.6 of 7 Transitions of Care Consensus Conference elements (range, 2.9-4.5; P<0.001). Hospital course was typically included (97.2%), but summaries were less likely to include discharge condition (30.7%), discharge volume status (16.0%), or discharge weight (15.7%). No discharge summary included all 7 Transitions of Care Consensus Conference-endorsed content elements, was dictated on the day of discharge, and was sent to a follow-up physician. CONCLUSIONS: Even at the highest performing hospital, discharge summary quality is insufficient in terms of timeliness, transmission, and content. Improvements in all aspects of discharge summary quality are necessary to enable the discharge summary to serve as an effective transitional care tool.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Single-site studies have demonstrated inadequate quality of discharge summaries in timeliness, transmission, and content, potentially contributing to adverse outcomes. However, degree of hospital-level variation in discharge summary quality for patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed discharge summaries of patients enrolled in the Telemonitoring to Improve Heart Failure Outcomes (Tele-HF) study. We assessed hospital-level performance on timeliness (fraction of summaries completed on the day of discharge), documented transmission to the follow-up physician, and content (presence of components suggested by the Transitions of Care Consensus Conference). We obtained 1501 discharge summaries from 1640 (91.5%) patients discharged alive from 46 hospitals. Among hospitals contributing ≥ 10 summaries, the median hospital dictated 69.2% of discharge summaries on the day of discharge (range, 0.0%-98.0%; P<0.001); documented transmission of 33.3% of summaries to the follow-up physician (range, 0.0%-75.7%; P<0.001); and included 3.6 of 7 Transitions of Care Consensus Conference elements (range, 2.9-4.5; P<0.001). Hospital course was typically included (97.2%), but summaries were less likely to include discharge condition (30.7%), discharge volume status (16.0%), or discharge weight (15.7%). No discharge summary included all 7 Transitions of Care Consensus Conference-endorsed content elements, was dictated on the day of discharge, and was sent to a follow-up physician. CONCLUSIONS: Even at the highest performing hospital, discharge summary quality is insufficient in terms of timeliness, transmission, and content. Improvements in all aspects of discharge summary quality are necessary to enable the discharge summary to serve as an effective transitional care tool.
Authors: David M Maslove; Richard E Leiter; Joshua Griesman; Corinne Arnott; Ophyr Mourad; Chi-Ming Chow; Chaim M Bell Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Gulshan Sharma; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Dong Zhang; Yong-Fang Kuo; Jean L Freeman; James S Goodwin Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Martin C Were; Xiaochun Li; Joe Kesterson; Jason Cadwallader; Chite Asirwa; Babar Khan; Marc B Rosenman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-07-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Vincenza Snow; Dennis Beck; Tina Budnitz; Doriane C Miller; Jane Potter; Robert L Wears; Kevin B Weiss; Mark V Williams Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-04-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Chaim M Bell; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Andrew D Auerbach; Peter J Kaboli; Tosha B Wetterneck; David V Gonzales; Vineet M Arora; James X Zhang; David O Meltzer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-12-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Eric Young; Chad Stickrath; Monica McNulty; Aaron J Calderon; Elizabeth Chapman; Jed D Gonzalo; Ethan F Kuperman; Max Lopez; Christopher J Smith; Joseph R Sweigart; Cecelia N Theobald; Robert E Burke Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2017-04
Authors: Brian M Salata; Madeline R Sterling; Ashley N Beecy; Ajayram V Ullal; Erica C Jones; Evelyn M Horn; Parag Goyal Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Harlan M Krumholz; Sarwat I Chaudhry; John A Spertus; Jennifer A Mattera; Beth Hodshon; Jeph Herrin Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Edward Nicol; Lyn A Hanmer; Ferdinand C Mukumbang; Wisdom Basera; Andiswa Zitho; Debbie Bradshaw Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Eric D Moyer; Erik B Lehman; Matthew D Bolton; Jennifer Goldstein; Ariana R Pichardo-Lowden Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 4.379