Ron N Alkalay1. 1. Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Electronic address: ralklay@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pathologic vertebral fractures are associated with intractable pain, loss of function and high morbidity in patients with metastatic spine disease. However, the failure mechanisms of vertebrae with lytic defects and the failed vertebrae's ability to retain load carrying capacity remain unclear. METHODS: Eighteen human thoracic and lumbar vertebrae with simulated uncontained bone defects were tested under compression-bending loads to failure. Failure was defined as 50% reduction in vertebral body height. The vertebrae were allowed to recover under load and re-tested to failure using the initial criteria. Repeated measure ANOVA was used to test for changes in strength and stiffness parameters. FINDINGS: Vertebral failure occurred via buckling and fracture of the cortex around the defect, followed by collapse of the defect region. Compared to the intact vertebrae, the failed vertebrae exhibited a significant loss in compressive strength (59%, p<0.001), stiffness (53%, p<0.05) and flexion (70%, p<0.01) strength. Significant reduction in anterior-posterior shear (strength (63%, p<0.01) and stiffness (67%, p<0.01)) and lateral bending strength (134%, p<0.05) were similarly recorded. In the intact vertebrae, apart from flexion strength (r(2)=0.63), both compressive and anterior-posterior shear strengths were weakly correlated with their stiffness parameters (r(2)=0.24 and r(2)=0.31). By contrast, in the failed vertebrae, these parameters were strongly correlated, (r(2)=0.91, r(2)=0.86, and r(2)=0.92, p<0.001 respectively). INTERPRETATION: Failure of the vertebral cortex at the defect site dominated the initiation and progression of vertebral failure with the vertebrae failing via a consolidation process of the vertebral bone. Once failed, the vertebrae showed remarkable loss of load carrying capacity.
BACKGROUND: Pathologic vertebral fractures are associated with intractable pain, loss of function and high morbidity in patients with metastatic spine disease. However, the failure mechanisms of vertebrae with lytic defects and the failed vertebrae's ability to retain load carrying capacity remain unclear. METHODS: Eighteen human thoracic and lumbar vertebrae with simulated uncontained bone defects were tested under compression-bending loads to failure. Failure was defined as 50% reduction in vertebral body height. The vertebrae were allowed to recover under load and re-tested to failure using the initial criteria. Repeated measure ANOVA was used to test for changes in strength and stiffness parameters. FINDINGS: Vertebral failure occurred via buckling and fracture of the cortex around the defect, followed by collapse of the defect region. Compared to the intact vertebrae, the failed vertebrae exhibited a significant loss in compressive strength (59%, p<0.001), stiffness (53%, p<0.05) and flexion (70%, p<0.01) strength. Significant reduction in anterior-posterior shear (strength (63%, p<0.01) and stiffness (67%, p<0.01)) and lateral bending strength (134%, p<0.05) were similarly recorded. In the intact vertebrae, apart from flexion strength (r(2)=0.63), both compressive and anterior-posterior shear strengths were weakly correlated with their stiffness parameters (r(2)=0.24 and r(2)=0.31). By contrast, in the failed vertebrae, these parameters were strongly correlated, (r(2)=0.91, r(2)=0.86, and r(2)=0.92, p<0.001 respectively). INTERPRETATION: Failure of the vertebral cortex at the defect site dominated the initiation and progression of vertebral failure with the vertebrae failing via a consolidation process of the vertebral bone. Once failed, the vertebrae showed remarkable loss of load carrying capacity.
Authors: Ron N Alkalay; Dietrich von Stechow; Katherine Torres; Serhan Hassan; Robert Sommerich; David Zurakowski Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Sandra E Roth; Payam Mousavi; Joel Finkelstein; Edward Chow; Hans Kreder; Cari M Whyne Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Ron N Alkalay; Michael W Groff; Marc A Stadelmann; Florian M Buck; Sven Hoppe; Nicolas Theumann; Umesh Mektar; Roger B Davis; David B Hackney Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2021-09-03
Authors: Ron N Alkalay; Robert Adamson; Alexander Miropolsky; Roger B Davis; Mike L Groff; David B Hackney Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 6.558
Authors: Marc A Stadelmann; Denis E Schenk; Ghislain Maquer; Christopher Lenherr; Florian M Buck; Dieter D Bosshardt; Sven Hoppe; Nicolas Theumann; Ron N Alkalay; Philippe K Zysset Journal: Bone Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 4.626
Authors: Dennis E Anderson; Michael W Groff; Thomas F Flood; Brett T Allaire; Roger B Davis; Marc A Stadelmann; Philippe K Zysset; Ron N Alkalay Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-08-05