Literature DB >> 1456084

Mechanical properties of trabecular bone within and adjacent to osseous metastases.

J A Hipp1, A E Rosenberg, W C Hayes.   

Abstract

Despite radiographic and histologic evidence of trabecular bone density changes within and adjacent to osseous metastases, there currently exist no data to demonstrate whether these changes are important in predicting the risk of fracture. To determine if these density changes result in significant reductions in mechanical properties, trabecular bone specimens were prepared from lower thoracic and lumbar vertebrae from two cadavers with radiographic, gross, and histologic evidence of lytic and/or blastic osseous metastases. Each specimen was classified as normal, lytic, or blastic based on appearance in fine-grain radiographs of 8-9 mm thick coronal plane sections. Specimens were tested to failure in uniaxial compression, and tissue and apparent densities were measured. Mean tissue densities were within normal ranges. The mean apparent density for all specimens combined was within the normal range for human vertebrae, and the mean apparent density for radiographically normal (0.131 g/ml) and lytic (0.111 g/ml) specimens was less than the mean apparent density of blastic (0.182 g/ml) specimens (p < 0.02). The moduli of lytic and blastic specimens were less than for normal specimens (p < 0.025). The strength of lytic specimens was less than normal (p = 0.057), but the strength of blastic specimens was not (p > 0.1). Apparent density explained significant fractions of the variations in both modulus (p < 0.001) and strength (p < 0.001). The data suggest that blastic changes associated with osseous metastases to trabecular bone disrupt the normal dependence of trabecular mechanical properties on apparent density, but lytic changes do not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1456084     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650071008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  8 in total

Review 1.  Fracture risk assessment and clinical decision making for patients with metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Timothy A Damron; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Osteolytic vs. Osteoblastic Metastatic Lesion: Computational Modeling of the Mechanical Behavior in the Human Vertebra after Screws Fixation Procedure.

Authors:  Daniele Bianchi; Cristina Falcinelli; Leonardo Molinari; Alessio Gizzi; Alberto Di Martino
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Development of Raman spectral markers to assess metastatic bone in breast cancer.

Authors:  Hao Ding; Jeffry S Nyman; Julie A Sterling; Daniel S Perrien; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Xiaohong Bi
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Female Human Spines with Simulated Osteolytic Defects: CT-based Structural Analysis of Vertebral Body Strength.

Authors:  Ron Alkalay; Robert Adamson; Alexander Miropolsky; David Hackney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Effect of the metastatic defect on the structural response and failure process of human vertebrae: an experimental study.

Authors:  Ron N Alkalay
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 2.034

Review 6.  Density and mechanical properties of vertebral trabecular bone-A review.

Authors:  Caroline Öhman-Mägi; Ondrej Holub; Dan Wu; Richard M Hall; Cecilia Persson
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2021-11-09

7.  Augmentation of failed human vertebrae with critical un-contained lytic defect restores their structural competence under functional loading: An experimental study.

Authors:  Ron N Alkalay; Dietrich von Stechow; David B Hackney
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 2.034

8.  The stability of osseous metastases of the spine in lung cancer--a retrospective analysis of 338 cases.

Authors:  Harald Rief; Marc Bischof; Thomas Bruckner; Thomas Welzel; Vasileios Askoxylakis; Stefan Rieken; Katja Lindel; Stephanie Combs; Jürgen Debus
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.