Literature DB >> 25584950

Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of the cervical spines in 1211 asymptomatic subjects.

Hiroaki Nakashima1, Yasutsugu Yukawa, Kota Suda, Masatsune Yamagata, Takayoshi Ueta, Fumihiko Kato.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and distribution of abnormal findings on cervical spine magnetic resonance image (MRI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Neurological symptoms and abnormal findings on MR images are keys to diagnose the spinal diseases. To determine the significance of MRI abnormalities, we must take into account the (1) frequency and (2) spectrum of structural abnormalities, which may be asymptomatic. However, no large-scale study has documented abnormal findings of the cervical spine on MR image in asymptomatic subjects.
METHODS: MR images were analyzed for the anteroposterior spinal cord diameter, disc bulging diameter, and axial cross-sectional area of the spinal cord in 1211 healthy volunteers. The age of healthy volunteers prospectively enrolled in this study ranged from 20 to 70 years, with approximately 100 individuals per decade, per sex. These data were used to determine the spectrum and degree of disc bulging, spinal cord compression (SCC), and increased signal intensity changes in the spinal cord.
RESULTS: Most subjects presented with disc bulging (87.6%), which significantly increased with age in terms of frequency, severity, and number of levels. Even most subjects in their 20s had bulging discs, with 73.3% and 78.0% of males and females, respectively. In contrast, few asymptomatic subjects were diagnosed with SCC (5.3%) or increased signal intensity (2.3%). These numbers increased with age, particularly after age 50 years. SCC mainly involved 1 level (58%) or 2 levels (38%), and predominantly occurred at C5-C6 (41%) and C6-C7 (27%).
CONCLUSION: Disc bulging was frequently observed in asymptomatic subjects, even including those in their 20s. The number of patients with minor disc bulging increased from age 20 to 50 years. In contrast, the frequency of SCC and increased signal intensity increased after age 50 years, and this was accompanied by increased severity of disc bulging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25584950     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  37 in total

Review 1.  Advancing imaging technologies for patients with spinal pain: with a focus on whiplash injury.

Authors:  James M Elliott; Mark J Hancock; Rebecca J Crawford; Andrew C Smith; David M Walton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Christopher D Witiw; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  CHANGING OUR DIAGNOSTIC PARADIGM: MOVEMENT SYSTEM DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  Paula M Ludewig; Danilo H Kamonseki; Justin L Staker; Rebekah L Lawrence; Paula R Camargo; Jonathan P Braman
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-11

4.  Etiology and treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Hernando Rafael; Juan Oscar David; Antonio Santiago Vilca
Journal:  Am J Neurodegener Dis       Date:  2017-04-15

5.  Does Overall Cervical Spine Pathology Relate to the Clinical Heterogeneity of Chronic Whiplash?

Authors:  James M Elliott; Todd B Parrish; David M Walton; Amy J Vassallo; Joel Fundaun; Marie Wasielewski; D Mark Courtney
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  Narrow cervical canal in 1211 asymptomatic healthy subjects: the relationship with spinal cord compression on MRI.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Kota Suda; Masatsune Yamagata; Takayoshi Ueta; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologies Crucial to Our Understanding of Spinal Conditions?

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; Maryse Fortin; Kenneth A Weber; Andrew Smith; James M Elliott
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Advancements in Imaging Technology: Do They (or Will They) Equate to Advancements in Our Knowledge of Recovery in Whiplash?

Authors:  James M Elliott; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Charles Hazle; Mark A Hoggarth; Jacob McPherson; Cheryl L Sparks; Kenneth A Weber
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Characteristics of C6-7 myelopathy: assessment of clinical symptoms and electrophysiological findings.

Authors:  M Funaba; T Kanchiku; Y Imajo; H Suzuki; Y Yoshida; N Nishida; K Fujimoto; T Taguchi
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  Unintended consequences: quantifying the benefits, iatrogenic harms and downstream cascade costs of musculoskeletal MRI in UK primary care.

Authors:  Imran Mohammed Sajid; Anand Parkunan; Kathleen Frost
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.