Literature DB >> 25583759

Combined anatomic factors predicting risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury for males and females.

Daniel R Sturnick1, Pamela M Vacek2, Michael J DeSarno2, Mack G Gardner-Morse1, Timothy W Tourville1, James R Slauterbeck1, Robert J Johnson1, Sandra J Shultz3, Bruce D Beynnon4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knee joint geometry has been associated with risk of suffering an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury; however, few studies have utilized multivariate analysis to investigate how different aspects of knee joint geometry combine to influence ACL injury risk. HYPOTHESES: Combinations of knee geometry measurements are more highly associated with the risk of suffering a noncontact ACL injury than individual measurements, and the most predictive combinations of measurements are different for males and females. STUDY
DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 88 first-time, noncontact, grade III ACL-injured subjects and 88 uninjured matched-control subjects were recruited, and magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired. The geometry of the tibial plateau subchondral bone, articular cartilage, and meniscus; geometry of the tibial spines; and size of the femoral intercondylar notch and ACL were measured. Multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to develop risk models for ACL injury in females and males separately.
RESULTS: For females, the best fitting model included width of the femoral notch at its anterior outlet and the posterior-inferior-directed slope of the lateral compartment articular cartilage surface, where a millimeter decrease in notch width and a degree increase in slope were independently associated with a 50% and 32% increase in risk of ACL injury, respectively. For males, a model that included ACL volume and the lateral compartment posterior meniscus to subchondral bone wedge angle was most highly associated with risk of ACL injury, where a 0.1 cm3 decrease in ACL volume (approximately 8% of the mean value) and a degree decrease in meniscus wedge angle were independently associated with a 43% and 23% increase in risk, correspondingly.
CONCLUSION: Combinations of knee joint geometry measurements provided more information about the risk of noncontact ACL injury than individual measures, and the aspects of geometry that best explained the relationship between knee geometry and the risk of injury were different between males and females. Consequently, a female with both a decreased femoral notch width and an increased posterior-inferior-directed lateral compartment tibial articular cartilage slope combined or a male with a decreased ACL volume and decreased lateral compartment posterior meniscus angle were most at risk for sustaining an ACL injury.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL injury; anatomy; risk factors; tibial geometry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25583759      PMCID: PMC6607022          DOI: 10.1177/0363546514563277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  46 in total

1.  A Sex-Stratified Multivariate Risk Factor Model for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Daniel R Sturnick; Erin C Argentieri; James R Slauterbeck; Timothy W Tourville; Sandra J Shultz; Pamela M Vacek
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Awareness of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury-Preventive Training Programs Among Female Collegiate Athletes.

Authors:  Miho J Tanaka; Lynne C Jones; Jared M Forman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Increased lateral tibial posterior slope is related to tibial tunnel widening after primary ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Soheil Sabzevari; Amir Ata Rahnemai-Azar; Humza S Shaikh; Justin W Arner; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Predicting Injury: Challenges in Prospective Injury Risk Factor Identification.

Authors:  Daniel R Clifton; Dustin R Grooms; Jay Hertel; James A Onate
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Combined Injury to the ACL and Lateral Meniscus Alters the Geometry of Articular Cartilage and Meniscus Soon After Initial Trauma.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Niccolo Fiorentino; Mack Gardner-Morse; Timothy W Tourville; James R Slauterbeck; Daniel R Sturnick; Erin C Argentieri; Carl W Imhauser
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Sex Differences in Anatomic Features Linked to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries During Skeletal Growth and Maturation.

Authors:  Shayan Hosseinzadeh; Ata M Kiapour
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Sex Comparisons of In Vivo Anterior Cruciate Ligament Morphometry.

Authors:  Hsin-Min Wang; Sandra J Shultz; Scott E Ross; Robert A Henson; David H Perrin; Robert A Kraft; Randy J Schmitz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Biomechanical Function and Size of the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the ACL Change Differently with Skeletal Growth in the Pig Model.

Authors:  Stephanie G Cone; Emily P Lambeth; Hongyu Ru; Lynn A Fordham; Jorge A Piedrahita; Jeffrey T Spang; Matthew B Fisher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: how, when and why? A narrative review of current evidence.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Alberto Grassi; Margherita Serra; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.