Jens Greve1, Murat Bas2, Thomas K Hoffmann1, Patrick J Schuler1, Patrick Weller3, Georg Kojda4, Ulrich Strassen2. 1. Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm. 2. Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Technische Universität München, München. 3. Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen. 4. Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The study objective was to generate pilot data to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of C1-esterase-inhibitor concentrate (C1-INH) compared to standard treatment in patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)-induced angioedema affecting the upper aerodigestive tract. STUDY DESIGN: Proof-of-concept case series with historical control. METHODS: Adult patients with angioedema in the upper aerodigestive tract presenting to the emergency department were included. After establishing the diagnosis of ACEi-induced angioedema based on patient history and thorough clinical examination, all patients were administered 1,000 international units (IU) of C1-INH intravenously. A historical control group consisting of adult patients with ACEi-induced angioedema who had been treated with intravenous corticosteroids and antihistamines at the same institution over the past 8 years was used for comparison. The most important parameters assessed were the time to complete resolution of symptoms and the need for intubation or tracheotomy. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in the C1-INH group and 47 in the corticosteroid/antihistamine group. The time to complete resolution of symptoms was considerably longer in the historical control group (33.1 ± 19.4 hours) than in the C1-INH group (10.1 ± 3.0 hours). No intubation or tracheotomy was needed in the C1-INH group (0/10 patients), whereas three out of the 47 historical controls required tracheotomy and two were intubated (5/47). CONCLUSION: The results suggest a role for C1-INH as an effective and safe therapeutic option in patients with ACEi-induced angioedema, which needs to be confirmed by further larger and double-blinded studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The study objective was to generate pilot data to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of C1-esterase-inhibitor concentrate (C1-INH) compared to standard treatment in patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)-induced angioedema affecting the upper aerodigestive tract. STUDY DESIGN: Proof-of-concept case series with historical control. METHODS: Adult patients with angioedema in the upper aerodigestive tract presenting to the emergency department were included. After establishing the diagnosis of ACEi-induced angioedema based on patient history and thorough clinical examination, all patients were administered 1,000 international units (IU) of C1-INH intravenously. A historical control group consisting of adult patients with ACEi-induced angioedema who had been treated with intravenous corticosteroids and antihistamines at the same institution over the past 8 years was used for comparison. The most important parameters assessed were the time to complete resolution of symptoms and the need for intubation or tracheotomy. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in the C1-INH group and 47 in the corticosteroid/antihistamine group. The time to complete resolution of symptoms was considerably longer in the historical control group (33.1 ± 19.4 hours) than in the C1-INH group (10.1 ± 3.0 hours). No intubation or tracheotomy was needed in the C1-INH group (0/10 patients), whereas three out of the 47 historical controls required tracheotomy and two were intubated (5/47). CONCLUSION: The results suggest a role for C1-INH as an effective and safe therapeutic option in patients with ACEi-induced angioedema, which needs to be confirmed by further larger and double-blinded studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Authors: J Hahn; B Bock; C-M Muth; A Pfaue; D Friedrich; T K Hoffmann; J Greve Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 0.840