Maria Kleinstäuber1, Ina Frank2, Cornelia Weise3. 1. Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Germany. Electronic address: maria.kleinstaeuber@staff.uni-marburg.de. 2. Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Germany. 3. Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Germany; Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Swedish Institute for Disability Research and Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Linköping, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Because the postulated three-factor structure of the internationally widely used Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) has not been confirmed yet by a confirmatory factor analytic approach this was the central aim of the current study. METHODS: From a clinical setting, N=373 patients with chronic tinnitus completed the THI and further questionnaires assessing tinnitus-related and psychological variables. In order to analyze the psychometric properties of the THI, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and correlational analyses were conducted. RESULTS: CFA provided a statistically significant support for a better fit of the data to the hypothesized three-factor structure (RMSEA=.049, WRMR=1.062, CFI=.965, TLI=.961) than to a general factor model (RMSEA=.062, WRMR=1.258, CFI=.942, TLI=.937). The calculation of Cronbach's alpha as indicator of internal consistency revealed satisfactory values (.80-.91) with the exception of the catastrophic subscale (.65). High positive correlations of the THI and its subscales with other measures of tinnitus distress, anxiety, and depression, high negative correlations with tinnitus acceptance, moderate positive correlations with anxiety sensitivity, sleeping difficulties, tinnitus loudness, and small correlations with the Big Five personality dimensions confirmed construct validity. CONCLUSION: Results show that the THI is a highly reliable and valid measure of tinnitus-related handicap. In contrast to results of previous exploratory analyses the current findings speak for a three-factor in contrast to a unifactorial structure. Future research is needed to replicate this result in different tinnitus populations.
OBJECTIVE: Because the postulated three-factor structure of the internationally widely used Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) has not been confirmed yet by a confirmatory factor analytic approach this was the central aim of the current study. METHODS: From a clinical setting, N=373 patients with chronic tinnitus completed the THI and further questionnaires assessing tinnitus-related and psychological variables. In order to analyze the psychometric properties of the THI, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and correlational analyses were conducted. RESULTS:CFA provided a statistically significant support for a better fit of the data to the hypothesized three-factor structure (RMSEA=.049, WRMR=1.062, CFI=.965, TLI=.961) than to a general factor model (RMSEA=.062, WRMR=1.258, CFI=.942, TLI=.937). The calculation of Cronbach's alpha as indicator of internal consistency revealed satisfactory values (.80-.91) with the exception of the catastrophic subscale (.65). High positive correlations of the THI and its subscales with other measures of tinnitus distress, anxiety, and depression, high negative correlations with tinnitus acceptance, moderate positive correlations with anxiety sensitivity, sleeping difficulties, tinnitus loudness, and small correlations with the Big Five personality dimensions confirmed construct validity. CONCLUSION: Results show that the THI is a highly reliable and valid measure of tinnitus-related handicap. In contrast to results of previous exploratory analyses the current findings speak for a three-factor in contrast to a unifactorial structure. Future research is needed to replicate this result in different tinnitus populations.
Authors: Madelyn R Frumkin; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Eldre W Beukes; Vinaya Manchaiah; Gerhard Andersson; Thomas L Rodebaugh Journal: Am J Audiol Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: Nicole Peter; Tobias Kleinjung; Raphael Jeker; Martin Meyer; Richard Klaghofer; Steffi Weidt Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Sarah Heinrich; Alexander Rozental; Per Carlbring; Gerhard Andersson; Katherine Cotter; Cornelia Weise Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2016-05-03
Authors: Martin Jensen; Eva Hüttenrauch; Jennifer Schmidt; Gerhard Andersson; Mira-Lynn Chavanon; Cornelia Weise Journal: Trials Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 2.279