| Literature DB >> 29325390 |
Muhammad Aqeel1, Ammar Ahmed1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Tinnitus is characterized as a perception of numerous auditory sounds in absence of external stimulus. Tinnitus can have a considerable consequence on a person's quality of life, and is considered to be very complicated to quantify. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of Urdu translation of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) in Pakistan. It was designed to assess the presence of various auditory sounds without the external stimulus. Scale consisted of 25 items having three subscales functional, emotional, and catastrophic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study comprised into two stages, preliminary and main studies. The results of preliminary study revealed that the overall scale had high internal consistency [alpha coefficient of Urdu version of THI (THI-U)= 0.99, alpha coefficient of English version of THI=0.98]. The overall scale had test-retest correlation over a fifteen days period of interval (0.99). Main study was performed on 110 tinnitus patients. The results of main study showed that the internal consistency and reliability of Urdu version was (α=0.93). The THI-U and its subscales demonstrated good internal consistency reliability ( α =0.81 to 0.86).Entities:
Keywords: Confirmatory factor analysis; Reproducibility of results; Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; Tinnitus patients; Translation
Year: 2017 PMID: 29325390 PMCID: PMC5784365 DOI: 10.7874/jao.2017.00108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Audiol Otol
Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, mean and SD, range values associated with the test-retest administration of the THI-E and THI-U (n=30)
| THI-U | Test (English) | Retest (Urdu) | Correlation coefficients | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional (maximum score: 48) | 0.99 | 0.000 | ||
| Mean | 8.66 | 8.8 | ||
| SD | 16.98 | 16.57 | ||
| Range | 0-48 | 0-48 | ||
| Emotional (maximum score: 32) | 0.99 | 0.000 | ||
| Mean | 4.4 | 4.93 | ||
| SD | 9.74 | 11.08 | ||
| Range | 0-28 | 0-32 | ||
| Catastrophic (maximum score: 20) | 0.97 | 0.000 | ||
| Mean | 2.53 | 2.53 | ||
| SD | 5.20 | 6.34 | ||
| Range | 0-16 | 0-20 | ||
| Total (maximum score: 100) | 0.99 | 0.000 | ||
| Mean | 15.60 | 16.26 | ||
| SD | 31.78 | 33.79 | ||
| Range | 0-92 | 0-100 |
SD: standard deviation, THI-E: English version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, THI-U: Urdu version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
Reliability coefficients (Cronbach’s α coefficient) of the THI-U and THI-E
| THI-U (α) | THI-E (α) | THI-U (item –total) | THI-E (item-total) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THI-total (25 items) | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.78-0.98 | 0.57-0.98 |
| Functional (12 items) | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.79-0.95 | 0.88-0.95 |
| Emotional (8 items) | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.73-0.99 | 0.45-0.97 |
| Catastrophic (5 items) | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.67-0.98 | 0.61-0.96 |
THI-E: English version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, THI-U: Urdu version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
Correlation matrix across the subscales and total for THIU (n=110)
| Scales | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. THI-U total | - | 0.956[ | 0.922[ | 0.873[ |
| 2. Functional | - | 0.816[ | 0.755[ | |
| 3. Emotional | - | 0.741[ | ||
| 4. Catastrophic | - |
p<0.01.
THI-U: Urdu version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
Item-total correlations for the total scale along with its three subscales
| THI-U | Emotional focus | Functional | Catastrophic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | r | r | r | |
| THI-U1 | 0.592[ | 0.546[ | ||
| THI-U2 | -0.031 | 0.096 | ||
| THI-U3 | 0.570[ | 0.645[ | ||
| THI-U4 | 0.628[ | 0.687[ | ||
| THI-U5 | 0.789[ | 0.738[ | ||
| THI-U6 | 0.586[ | 0.648[ | ||
| THI-U7 | 0.635[ | 0.650[ | ||
| THI-U8 | 0.639[ | 0.766[ | ||
| THI-U9 | 0.750[ | 0.745[ | ||
| THI-U10 | 0.730[ | 0.777[ | ||
| THI-U11 | 0.717[ | 0.807[ | ||
| THI-U12 | 0.730[ | 0.692[ | ||
| THI-U13 | 0.550[ | 0.629[ | ||
| THI-U14 | 0.717[ | 0.681[ | ||
| THI-U15 | 0.713[ | 0.716[ | ||
| THI-U16 | 0.542[ | 0.630[ | ||
| THI-U17 | 0.326[ | 0.402[ | ||
| THI-U18 | 0.717[ | 0.776[ | ||
| THI-U19 | 0.538[ | 0.688[ | ||
| THI-U20 | 0.705[ | 0.731[ | ||
| THI-U21 | 0.629[ | 0.699[ | ||
| THI-U22 | 0.736[ | 0.734[ | ||
| THI-U23 | 0.619[ | 0.787[ | ||
| THI-U24 | 0.556[ | 0.607[ | ||
| THI-U25 | 0.680[ | 0.668[ |
p<0.01.
THI-U: Urdu version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
Confirmatory factor fit indices
| Scale and factor | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | IFI | TLI | RMSEA | CI (90%) | ECVI | CI (90%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THI-U | ||||||||||
| 1 (25 items) | 1033.97 | 272 | 3.80 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.16 | 0.15-0.17 | 10.46 | 9.6-11.40 |
| 2 (25 items) | 689.02 | 234 | 2.94 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.13 | 0.12-0.15 | 7.99 | 7.3-8.7 |
| 3 (25 items) | 285.84 | 190 | 1.50 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.07 | 0.05-0.08 | 5.1 | 4.71-5.55 |
THI-U: Urdu version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, CFI: conformity fit index, IFI: incremental fit index, TLI: Tucker-Lewis Index, RMSEA: root-mean- square error of approximation, CI: confidence interval, ECVI: expected cross-validation index
Factor loading of confirmatory factor analysis
| Scales | Items | Factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | β | ||
| Functional | 1 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.565[ |
| 2 | -0.382 | 0.225 | -0.164 | |
| 4 | 1.193 | 0.228 | 0.620[ | |
| 7 | 1.490 | 0.273 | 0.679[ | |
| 9 | 1.613 | 0.268 | 0.780[ | |
| 12 | 1.366 | 0.215 | 0.705[ | |
| 14 | 1.370 | 0.255 | 0.654[ | |
| 15 | 1.607 | 0.287 | 0.695[ | |
| 18 | 1.604 | 0.314 | 0.695[ | |
| 20 | 1.528 | 0.279 | 0.672[ | |
| 24 | 0.959 | 0.215 | 0.448[ | |
| 13 | 0.980 | 0.241 | 0.474[ | |
| Emotional | 3 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.577[ |
| 6 | 0.980 | 0.206 | 0.524[ | |
| 10 | 1.141 | 0.156 | 0.663[ | |
| 16 | 0.948 | 0.206 | 0.596[ | |
| 17 | 0.375 | 0.185 | 0.203[ | |
| 22 | 1.166 | 0.189 | 0.748[ | |
| 25 | 1.182 | 0.216 | 0.643[ | |
| 21 | 1.097 | 0.179 | 0.691[ | |
| Catastrophic | 5 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.819[ |
| 8 | 0.772 | 0.114 | 0.603[ | |
| 11 | 0.825 | 0.096 | 0.722[ | |
| 19 | 0.561 | 0.109 | 0.471[ | |
| 23 | 0.667 | 0.100 | 0.595[ | |
p<0.001,
p<0.0001.
SE: standard error
Fig. 1.Path diagram for the three factor varimax model with item loading from the confirmatory factor analysis in main study. F1: functional, F2: emotional, F3: catastrophic.