Literature DB >> 25582589

Heterogeneity in genetic and nongenetic variation and energy sink relationships for residual feed intake across research stations and countries.

R J Tempelman1, D M Spurlock2, M Coffey3, R F Veerkamp4, L E Armentano5, K A Weigel5, Y de Haas5, C R Staples6, E E Connor7, Y Lu8, M J VandeHaar8.   

Abstract

Our long-term objective is to develop breeding strategies for improving feed efficiency in dairy cattle. In this study, phenotypic data were pooled across multiple research stations to facilitate investigation of the genetic and nongenetic components of feed efficiency in Holstein cattle. Specifically, the heritability of residual feed intake (RFI) was estimated and heterogeneous relationships between RFI and traits relating to energy utilization were characterized across research stations. Milk, fat, protein, and lactose production converted to megacalories (milk energy; MilkE), dry matter intakes (DMI), and body weights (BW) were collected on 6,824 lactations from 4,893 Holstein cows from research stations in Scotland, the Netherlands, and the United States. Weekly DMI, recorded between 50 to 200 d in milk, was fitted as a linear function of MilkE, BW0.75, and change in BW (ΔBW), along with parity, a fifth-order polynomial on days in milk (DIM), and the interaction between this polynomial and parity in a first-stage model. The residuals from this analysis were considered to be a phenotypic measure of RFI. Estimated partial regression coefficients of DMI on MilkE and on BW0.75 ranged from 0.29 to 0.47 kg/Mcal for MilkE across research stations, whereas estimated partial regression coefficients on BW0.75 ranged from 0.06 to 0.16 kg/kg0.75. Estimated partial regression coefficients on ΔBW ranged from 0.06 to 0.39 across stations. Heritabilities for country-specific RFI were based on fitting second-stage random regression models and ranged from 0.06 to 0.24 depending on DIM. The overall heritability estimate across all research stations and all DIM was 0.15±0.02, whereas an alternative analysis based on combining the first- and second-stage model as 1 model led to an overall heritability estimate of 0.18±0.02. Hence future genomic selection programs on feed efficiency appear to be promising; nevertheless, care should be taken to allow for potentially heterogeneous variance components and partial relationships between DMI and other energy sink traits across environments when determining RFI.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heritability; international study; random regression model; residual feed intake

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25582589     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014.8510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  11 in total

1.  Macro-environmental sensitivity for growth rate in Danish Duroc pigs is under genetic control.

Authors:  Mette D Madsen; Per Madsen; Bjarne Nielsen; Torsten N Kristensen; Just Jensen; Mahmoud Shirali
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Selecting for Feed Efficient Cows Will Help to Reduce Methane Gas Emissions.

Authors:  Coralia Ines Valentina Manzanilla-Pech; Rasmus Bak Stephansen; Gareth Frank Difford; Peter Løvendahl; Jan Lassen
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Consistency of feed efficiency ranking and mechanisms associated with inter-animal variation among growing calves.

Authors:  A Asher; A Shabtay; M Cohen-Zinder; Y Aharoni; J Miron; R Agmon; I Halachmi; A Orlov; A Haim; L O Tedeschi; G E Carstens; K A Johnson; A Brosh
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  RNA-Seq transcriptomics and pathway analyses reveal potential regulatory genes and molecular mechanisms in high- and low-residual feed intake in Nordic dairy cattle.

Authors:  M S Salleh; G Mazzoni; J K Höglund; D W Olijhoek; P Lund; P Løvendahl; H N Kadarmideen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Association of residual feed intake with abundance of ruminal bacteria and biopolymer hydrolyzing enzyme activities during the peripartal period and early lactation in Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  Ahmed A Elolimy; José M Arroyo; Fernanda Batistel; Michael A Iakiviak; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-14

6.  Effects of Incorporating Dry Matter Intake and Residual Feed Intake into a Selection Index for Dairy Cattle Using Deterministic Modeling.

Authors:  Kerry Houlahan; Flavio S Schenkel; Dagnachew Hailemariam; Jan Lassen; Morten Kargo; John B Cole; Erin E Connor; Silvia Wegmann; Oliveira Junior; Filippo Miglior; Allison Fleming; Tatiane C S Chud; Christine F Baes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  Opportunities to Harness High-Throughput and Novel Sensing Phenotypes to Improve Feed Efficiency in Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Cori J Siberski-Cooper; James E Koltes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Assessment of the Relationship between Postpartum Health and Mid-Lactation Performance, Behavior, and Feed Efficiency in Holstein Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Malia J Martin; Kent A Weigel; Heather M White
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Semi-supervised learning for genomic prediction of novel traits with small reference populations: an application to residual feed intake in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Chen Yao; Xiaojin Zhu; Kent A Weigel
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Circulating Metabolites Indicate Differences in High and Low Residual Feed Intake Holstein Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Malia J Martin; Ryan S Pralle; Isabelle R Bernstein; Michael J VandeHaar; Kent A Weigel; Zheng Zhou; Heather M White
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.