Literature DB >> 25582580

Human spinal locomotor control is based on flexibly organized burst generators.

Simon M Danner1, Ursula S Hofstoetter2, Brigitta Freundl3, Heinrich Binder3, Winfried Mayr2, Frank Rattay4, Karen Minassian5.   

Abstract

Constant drive provided to the human lumbar spinal cord by epidural electrical stimulation can cause local neural circuits to generate rhythmic motor outputs to lower limb muscles in people paralysed by spinal cord injury. Epidural spinal cord stimulation thus allows the study of spinal rhythm and pattern generating circuits without their configuration by volitional motor tasks or task-specific peripheral feedback. To reveal spinal locomotor control principles, we studied the repertoire of rhythmic patterns that can be generated by the functionally isolated human lumbar spinal cord, detected as electromyographic activity from the legs, and investigated basic temporal components shared across these patterns. Ten subjects with chronic, motor-complete spinal cord injury were studied. Surface electromyographic responses to lumbar spinal cord stimulation were collected from quadriceps, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, and triceps surae in the supine position. From these data, 10-s segments of rhythmic activity present in the four muscle groups of one limb were extracted. Such samples were found in seven subjects. Physiologically adequate cycle durations and relative extension- and flexion-phase durations similar to those needed for locomotion were generated. The multi-muscle activation patterns exhibited a variety of coactivation, mixed-synergy and locomotor-like configurations. Statistical decomposition of the electromyographic data across subjects, muscles and samples of rhythmic patterns identified three common temporal components, i.e. basic or shared activation patterns. Two of these basic patterns controlled muscles to contract either synchronously or alternatingly during extension- and flexion-like phases. The third basic pattern contributed to the observed muscle activities independently from these extensor- and flexor-related basic patterns. Each bifunctional muscle group was able to express both extensor- and flexor-patterns, with variable ratios across the samples of rhythmic patterns. The basic activation patterns can be interpreted as central drives implemented by spinal burst generators that impose specific spatiotemporally organized activation on the lumbosacral motor neuron pools. Our data thus imply that the human lumbar spinal cord circuits can form burst-generating elements that flexibly combine to obtain a wide range of locomotor outputs from a constant, repetitive input. It may be possible to use this flexibility to incorporate specific adaptations to gait and stance to improve locomotor control, even after severe central nervous system damage.
© The Author (2015). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central pattern generation; epidural spinal cord stimulation; human; modular organization; spinal cord injury

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25582580      PMCID: PMC4408427          DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  54 in total

1.  Evidence of subclinical brain influence in clinically complete spinal cord injury: discomplete SCI.

Authors:  A M Sherwood; M R Dimitrijevic; W B McKay
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 2.  Biological pattern generation: the cellular and computational logic of networks in motion.

Authors:  Sten Grillner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Optogenetic dissection reveals multiple rhythmogenic modules underlying locomotion.

Authors:  Martin Hägglund; Kimberly J Dougherty; Lotta Borgius; Shigeyoshi Itohara; Takuji Iwasato; Ole Kiehn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Motor control after spinal cord injury: assessment using surface EMG.

Authors:  A M Sherwood; W B McKay; M R Dimitrijević
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Can modular strategies simplify neural control of multidirectional human locomotion?

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Valentina La Scaleia; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  On the initiation of the swing phase of locomotion in chronic spinal cats.

Authors:  S Grillner; S Rossignol
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-05-12       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Two types of motor modulation underlying human stepping evoked by spinal cord electrical stimulation (SCES).

Authors:  E Y Shapkova; E D Schomburg
Journal:  Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg       Date:  2001

8.  Split-belt treadmill stepping in infants suggests autonomous pattern generators for the left and right leg in humans.

Authors:  Jaynie F Yang; Erin V Lamont; Marco Y C Pang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neural control of locomotion; The central pattern generator from cats to humans.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Pharmacologically evoked fictive motor patterns in the acutely spinalized marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  B Fedirchuk; J Nielsen; N Petersen; H Hultborn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  42 in total

1.  Periodic modulation of repetitively elicited monosynaptic reflexes of the human lumbosacral spinal cord.

Authors:  Ursula S Hofstoetter; Simon M Danner; Brigitta Freundl; Heinrich Binder; Winfried Mayr; Frank Rattay; Karen Minassian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Bilateral deficit in maximal force production.

Authors:  Jakob Škarabot; Neil Cronin; Vojko Strojnik; Janne Avela
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Central control of interlimb coordination and speed-dependent gait expression in quadrupeds.

Authors:  Simon M Danner; Simon D Wilshin; Natalia A Shevtsova; Ilya A Rybak
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Neuromuscular adjustments of gait associated with unstable conditions.

Authors:  G Martino; Y P Ivanenko; A d'Avella; M Serrao; A Ranavolo; F Draicchio; G Cappellini; C Casali; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Stepping responses to treadmill perturbations vary with severity of motor deficits in human SCI.

Authors:  Virginia W T Chu; T George Hornby; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  WT1-Expressing Interneurons Regulate Left-Right Alternation during Mammalian Locomotor Activity.

Authors:  Farhia Haque; Vladimir Rancic; Wei Zhang; Robin Clugston; Klaus Ballanyi; Simon Gosgnach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Corticospinal and transcallosal modulation of unilateral and bilateral contractions of lower limbs.

Authors:  Jakob Škarabot; Ruben Perellón Alfonso; Neil Cronin; Jure Bon; Vojko Strojnik; Janne Avela
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Electrocorticographic Encoding of Human Gait in the Leg Primary Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Colin M McCrimmon; Po T Wang; Payam Heydari; Angelica Nguyen; Susan J Shaw; Hui Gong; Luis A Chui; Charles Y Liu; Zoran Nenadic; An H Do
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Spinal cord repair: advances in biology and technology.

Authors:  Grégoire Courtine; Michael V Sofroniew
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Configuration of electrical spinal cord stimulation through real-time processing of gait kinematics.

Authors:  Marco Capogrosso; Fabien B Wagner; Jerome Gandar; Eduardo Martin Moraud; Nikolaus Wenger; Tomislav Milekovic; Polina Shkorbatova; Natalia Pavlova; Pavel Musienko; Erwan Bezard; Jocelyne Bloch; Grégoire Courtine
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 13.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.