Literature DB >> 25581671

North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2011-2012.

Erin M Warshaw1, Howard I Maibach, James S Taylor, Denis Sasseville, Joel G DeKoven, Matthew J Zirwas, Anthony F Fransway, C G Toby Mathias, Kathryn A Zug, Vincent A DeLeo, Joseph F Fowler, James G Marks, Melanie D Pratt, Frances J Storrs, Donald V Belsito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patch testing is an important diagnostic tool for assessment of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD).
OBJECTIVE: This study documents the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) patch-testing results from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012.
METHODS: At 12 centers in North America, patients were tested in a standardized manner with a series of 70 allergens. Data were manually verified and entered into a central database. Descriptive frequencies were calculated, and trends analyzed using χ statistics.
RESULTS: Four thousand two hundred thirty-eight patients were tested; of these, 2705 patients (63.8%) had at least 1 positive reaction, and 2029 (48.0%) were ultimately determined to have a primary diagnosis of ACD. Four hundred eight patients (9.6%) had occupationally related skin disease. There were 7532 positive allergic reactions. As compared with previous reporting periods (2009-2010 and 2000-2010), positive reaction rates statistically increased for 6 allergens: methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (5.0%; risk ratios [RRs]: 2.01 [1.60-2.52], 1.87 [1.61-2.18]), lanolin alcohol (4.6%; RRs 1.83 [1.45-2.30], 2.10 [1.79-2.47]), cinnamic aldehyde (3.9%; 1.69 [1.32-2.15], 1.53 [1.28-1.82]), glutaral (1.5%; 1.67 [1.13-2.48], 1.31 [1.00-1.71]), paraben mix (1.4%; 1.77 [1.16-2.69], 1.44 [1.09-1.92]), and fragrance mix I (12.1%; RRs 1.42 [1.25-1.61], 1.24 [1.14-1.36]). Compared with the previous decade, positivity rates for all formaldehyde-releasing preservatives significantly decreased (formaldehyde 6.6%; RR, 0.82 [0.73, 0.93]; quaternium-15 6.4% RR 0.75 [0.66, 0.85]; diazolidinyl urea 2.1%; RR, 0.67 [0.54, 0.84]; imidazolidinyl urea 1.6%, 0.60 [0.47, 0.77]; bronopol 1.6%; RR, 0.60 [0.46, 0.77]; DMDM hydantoin 1.6%; RR, 0.59 [0.54, 0.84]). Approximately a quarter of patients had at least 1 relevant allergic reaction to a non-NACDG allergen. In addition, approximately one-fourth to one-third of reactions detected by NACDG allergens would have been hypothetically missed by T.R.U.E. TEST (SmartPractice Denmark, Hillerød, Denmark).
CONCLUSIONS: These data document the beginning of the epidemic of sensitivity to methylisothiazolinones in North America, which has been well documented in Europe. Patch testing with allergens beyond a standard screening tray is necessary for complete evaluation of occupational and nonoccupational ACD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25581671     DOI: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatitis        ISSN: 1710-3568            Impact factor:   4.845


  15 in total

Review 1.  Contribution of antimicrobials to the development of allergic disease.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Lisa Weatherly; Hillary L Shane
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 7.486

2.  Consumer Preferences, Product Characteristics, and Potentially Allergenic Ingredients in Best-selling Moisturizers.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Michael Kwa; Mary E Lohman; Rachel Evers-Meltzer; Jonathan I Silverberg
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 3.  Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers.

Authors:  Cara Symanzik; Patricia Weinert; Željka Babić; Sarah Hallmann; Martin Stibius Havmose; Jeanne Duus Johansen; Sanja Kezic; Marija Macan; Jelena Macan; Julia Strahwald; Rajka Turk; Henk F van der Molen; Swen Malte John; Wolfgang Uter
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  [Diagnostic workup of fragrance allergy].

Authors:  J Geier; W Uter
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Contact Dermatitis, Patch Testing, and Allergen Avoidance.

Authors:  Nicole M Burkemper
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

Review 6.  Natural (Mineral, Vegetable, Coconut, Essential) Oils and Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Vermén M Verallo-Rowell; Stephanie S Katalbas; Julia P Pangasinan
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.806

7.  A perspective on the safety of parabens as preservatives in wound care products.

Authors:  Eveline Torfs; Gilles Brackman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency.

Authors:  Anne Marie Api; Rahul Parakhia; Devin OʼBrien; David A Basketter
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 4.845

9.  Prime and boost aerosol exposure via fog machine or shisha smoke followed by cinnamon hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis to spiced food.

Authors:  Erika Jensen-Jarolim; Franziska Roth-Walter; Erich Leitner; Stefan Buchleitner; Harald Vogelsang; Tamar Kinaciyan
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.084

10.  The role of expanded series patch testing in identifying causality of residual facial dermatitis following initiation of dupilumab therapy.

Authors:  Raagini Suresh; Jenny E Murase
Journal:  JAAD Case Rep       Date:  2018-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.