Literature DB >> 25580939

Reading Level and Length of Written Research Consent Forms.

Elaine Larson1, Gabriella Foe2, Rachel Lally3.   

Abstract

In 100 Institutional Review Board approved consent forms (CFs), we assessed pages, reading levels, and whether they included essential elements. CF page numbers ranged from 3 to 28 (mean, 10.3) and readability ranged from grades 5.6 to 28.9 (mean, 11.6). The CF mean score for including essential elements was 90.8% (range: 63.5-100%). There were no significant differences by specialty in number of pages (p = 0.053), but surgical specialties had the highest readability (mean, 13.1), and pediatrics the lowest (10.5), p = 0.008. While approved CFs generally included the Office for Human Research Protections recommended essential elements, they were very long, and even pediatric forms, which had the lowest reading levels, were written on average at a tenth grade level. Researchers need guidance to resolve pressure between regulatory mandates and guidelines and "keeping it simple and clear."
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethics; evidence-based medicine; patients; prevention; psychosocial; risk management

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25580939      PMCID: PMC5351029          DOI: 10.1111/cts.12253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Sci        ISSN: 1752-8054            Impact factor:   4.689


  5 in total

1.  Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.

Authors:  Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Holly A Taylor; Frederick L Brancati
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Readability of consent form templates: a second look.

Authors:  Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Frederick L Brancati; Holly A Taylor; Sumati Jain; Anjali Pandit; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wanda Montalvo; Elaine Larson
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.176

4.  How IRBs view and make decisions about consent forms.

Authors:  Robert L Klitzman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Giving consent without getting informed: a cross-cultural issue in research ethics.

Authors:  Lilian Ghandour; Rola Yasmine; Faysal El-Kak
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.742

  5 in total
  14 in total

1.  An Observational Study of the Association of Video- Versus Text-Based Informed Consent With Multicenter Trial Enrollment: Lessons From the PALM Study (Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management).

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Shuang Li; Laura E Webb; Vincent Miller; Ann Marie Navar; Eric D Peterson; Tracy Y Wang
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-04

2.  Effective Practices to Improve Recruitment, Retention, and Partnerships in School-Based Studies.

Authors:  Laureen H Smith; Rick L Petosa
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.812

3.  Understanding the Use of Optimal Formatting and Plain Language When Presenting Key Information in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Erin D Solomon; Jessica Mozersky; Matthew P Wroblewski; Kari Baldwin; Meredith V Parsons; Melody Goodman; James M DuBois
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  An Assessment of a Shortened Consent Form for the Storage and Research Use of Residual Newborn Screening Blood Spots.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Aaron Goldenberg; Erin Johnson; Naomi Riches; Beth Tarini; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Too Dense and Too Detailed: Evaluation of the Health Literacy Attributes of an Informed Consent Document.

Authors:  Vanessa W Simonds; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-12-10

6.  Standard Versus Simplified Consent Materials for Biobank Participation: Differences in Patient Knowledge and Trial Accrual.

Authors:  Sarah B Garrett; Marie Murphy; James Wiley; Daniel Dohan
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.978

7.  Factors Influencing Successful Recruitment of Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients for an Observational HIV Cohort Study in Washington, DC.

Authors:  Maria Jaurretche; Matthew Levy; Amanda D Castel; Lindsey Powers Happ; Anne K Monroe; Karen F Wyche
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2021-03-15

8.  Permission form synopses to improve parents' understanding of research: a randomized trial.

Authors:  C T D'Angio; H Wang; J E Hunn; G S Pryhuber; P R Chess; S Lakshminrusimha
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Assessing usefulness and researcher satisfaction with consent form templates.

Authors:  Elaine L Larson; Alan Teller; Alejandra N Aguirre; Jhia Jackson; Dodi Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-08

Review 10.  Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.