Literature DB >> 25578711

Nanomechanical mapping of bone tissue regenerated by magnetic scaffolds.

Michele Bianchi1, Marco Boi, Maria Sartori, Gianluca Giavaresi, Nicola Lopomo, Milena Fini, Alek Dediu, Anna Tampieri, Maurilio Marcacci, Alessandro Russo.   

Abstract

Nanoindentation can provide new insights on the maturity stage of regenerating bone. The aim of the present study was the evaluation of the nanomechanical properties of newly-formed bone tissue at 4 weeks from the implantation of permanent magnets and magnetic scaffolds in the trabecular bone of rabbit femoral condyles. Three different groups have been investigated: MAG-A (NdFeB magnet + apatite/collagen scaffold with magnetic nanoparticles directly nucleated on the collagen fibers during scaffold synthesis); MAG-B (NdFeB magnet + apatite/collagen scaffold later infiltrated with magnetic nanoparticles) and MAG (NdFeB magnet). The mechanical properties of different-maturity bone tissues, i.e. newly-formed immature, newly-formed mature and native trabecular bone have been evaluated for the three groups. Contingent correlations between elastic modulus and hardness of immature, mature and native bone have been examined and discussed, as well as the efficacy of the adopted regeneration method in terms of "mechanical gap" between newly-formed and native bone tissue. The results showed that MAG-B group provided regenerated bone tissue with mechanical properties closer to that of native bone compared to MAG-A or MAG groups after 4 weeks from implantation. Further, whereas the mechanical properties of newly-formed immature and mature bone were found to be fairly good correlated, no correlation was detected between immature or mature bone and native bone. The reported results evidence the efficacy of nanoindentation tests for the investigation of the maturity of newly-formed bone not accessible through conventional analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25578711     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5363-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  30 in total

1.  Nanoindentation measurements of biomechanical properties in mature and newly formed bone tissue surrounding an implant.

Authors:  Romain Vayron; Etienne Barthel; Vincent Mathieu; Emmanuel Soffer; Fani Anagnostou; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of Haversian cortical bone.

Authors:  T Hoc; L Henry; M Verdier; D Aubry; L Sedel; A Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Nanobiomechanics of repair bone regenerated by genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Kuangshin Tai; Gadi Pelled; Dima Sheyn; Anna Bershteyn; Lin Han; Ilan Kallai; Yoram Zilberman; Christine Ortiz; Dan Gazit
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Quantitative, structural, and image-based mechanical analysis of nonunion fracture repaired by genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Ilan Kallai; G Harry van Lenthe; Davide Ruffoni; Yoram Zilberman; Ralph Müller; Gadi Pelled; Dan Gazit
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  The use of nanoindentation for characterizing the properties of mineralized hard tissues: state-of-the art review.

Authors:  Gladius Lewis; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  Bone properties by nanoindentation in mild and severe osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Carolyne Albert; John Jameson; Jeffrey M Toth; Peter Smith; Gerald Harris
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Nanoindentation discriminates the elastic properties of individual human bone lamellae under dry and physiological conditions.

Authors:  S Hengsberger; A Kulik; Ph Zysset
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Human iliac crest cancellous bone elastic modulus and hardness differ with bone formation rate per bone surface but not by existence of prevalent vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; D Sudhaker Rao; Leonardo Ajdelsztajn; Traci E Ciarelli; Enrique J Lavernia; David P Fyhrie
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  Magnetic hydroxyapatite bone substitutes to enhance tissue regeneration: evaluation in vitro using osteoblast-like cells and in vivo in a bone defect.

Authors:  Silvia Panseri; Carla Cunha; Teresa D'Alessandro; Monica Sandri; Alessandro Russo; Gianluca Giavaresi; Maurilio Marcacci; Clark T Hung; Anna Tampieri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Histomorphometric evaluation of bone healing in rabbit fibular osteotomy model without fixation.

Authors:  Marcos A Matos; Francisco P Araújo; Fabio B Paixão
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  3 in total

1.  Magnetic forces and magnetized biomaterials provide dynamic flux information during bone regeneration.

Authors:  Alessandro Russo; Michele Bianchi; Maria Sartori; Annapaola Parrilli; Silvia Panseri; Alessandro Ortolani; Monica Sandri; Marco Boi; Donald M Salter; Maria Cristina Maltarello; Gianluca Giavaresi; Milena Fini; Valentin Dediu; Anna Tampieri; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Histological, Histomorphometrical, and Biomechanical Studies of Bone-Implanted Medical Devices: Hard Resin Embedding.

Authors:  M Maglio; F Salamanna; S Brogini; V Borsari; S Pagani; N Nicoli Aldini; G Giavaresi; M Fini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Magnetic Nanoparticles in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Akshith Dasari; Jingyi Xue; Sanjukta Deb
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.076

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.