Literature DB >> 22482674

Nanoindentation measurements of biomechanical properties in mature and newly formed bone tissue surrounding an implant.

Romain Vayron1, Etienne Barthel, Vincent Mathieu, Emmanuel Soffer, Fani Anagnostou, Guillaume Haiat.   

Abstract

The characterization of the biomechanical properties of newly formed bone tissue around implants is important to understand the osseointegration process. The objective of this study is to investigate the evolution of the hardness and indentation modulus of newly formed bone tissue as a function of healing time. To do so, a nanoindentation device is employed following a multimodality approach using histological analysis. Coin-shaped implants were placed in vivo at a distance of 200 μm from the cortical bone surface, leading to an initially empty cavity of 200 μm * 4.4 mm. Three New Zealand White rabbits were sacrificed after 4, 7, and 13 weeks of healing time. The bone samples were embedded and analyzed using histological analyses, allowing to distinguish mature and newly formed bone tissue. The bone mechanical properties were then measured in mature and newly formed bone tissue. The results are within the range of hardness and apparent Young's modulus values reported in previous literature. One-way ANOVA test revealed a significant effect of healing time on the indentation modulus (p < 0.001, F = 111.24) and hardness (p < 0.02, F = 3.47) of bone tissue. A Tukey-Kramer analysis revealed that the biomechanical properties of newly formed bone tissue (4 weeks) were significantly different from those of mature bone tissue. The comparison with the results obtained in Mathieu et al. (2011, "Micro-Brillouin Scattering Measurements in Mature and Newly Formed Bone Tissue Surrounding an Implant," J. Biomech. Eng., 133, 021006). shows that bone mass density increases by approximately 13.5% between newly formed bone (7 weeks) and mature bone tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22482674     DOI: 10.1115/1.4005981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  11 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Effect of guided bone regeneration on bone quality surrounding dental implants.

Authors:  Trenton B Johnson; Ben Siderits; Seth Nye; Yong-Hoon Jeong; Seung-Hee Han; In-Chul Rhyu; Jung-Suk Han; Toru Deguchi; F Michael Beck; Do-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Nanomechanical mapping of bone tissue regenerated by magnetic scaffolds.

Authors:  Michele Bianchi; Marco Boi; Maria Sartori; Gianluca Giavaresi; Nicola Lopomo; Milena Fini; Alek Dediu; Anna Tampieri; Maurilio Marcacci; Alessandro Russo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Ultrasonic Evaluation of the Bone-Implant Interface.

Authors:  Yoann Hériveaux; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Sustained delivery of rhBMP-2 by means of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres: cranial bone regeneration without heterotopic ossification or craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Jason D Wink; Patrick A Gerety; Rami D Sherif; Youngshin Lim; Nadya A Clarke; Chamith S Rajapakse; Hyun-Duck Nah; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Micro/Nanostructures and Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in Ovariectomized Rats.

Authors:  Shidi Hu; Jin Li; Lu Liu; Ruchun Dai; Zhifeng Sheng; Xianping Wu; Xiqiao Feng; Xuefeng Yao; Eryuan Liao; Evan Keller; Yebin Jiang
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.257

7.  Elastography of the bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Yoann Hériveaux; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Didier Geiger; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena.

Authors:  M Fraulob; R Vayron; S Le Cann; B Lecuelle; Y Hériveaux; H Albini Lomami; C H Flouzat Lachaniette; G Haïat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The relative contribution of bone microarchitecture and matrix composition to implant fixation strength in rats.

Authors:  Kyle D Anderson; Frank C Ko; Spencer Fullam; Amarjit S Virdi; Markus A Wimmer; Dale R Sumner; Ryan D Ross
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Comparison of Resonance Frequency Analysis and of Quantitative Ultrasound to Assess Dental Implant Osseointegration.

Authors:  Romain Vayron; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Benoît Lecuelle; Hugues Albini Lomami; Jean-Paul Meningaud; Romain Bosc; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.